Oh Look! We Found The Tapes

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

This has got to be a "worst case" scenario for Darrell Issa.

If all the tapes have been recovered then he will be exposed as having orchestrated a fraud upon the American public.

Naturally, he'll spin it otherwise and enlist folks like Vetty to continue to spread the deception....

 

[NeverEndingMe]

don't worry, that jackass UD or his equally fucked Rob will come up with some excuse. Then that KingofAssHumpingTards will blame it on Republicans

 

[NeverEndingMe]

This has got to be a "worst case" scenario for Darrell Issa.

If all the tapes have been recovered then he will be exposed as having orchestrated a fraud upon the American public.

Naturally, he'll spin it otherwise and enlist folks like Vetty to continue to spread the deception....

of course...like they really 'lost' the tapes to being with. they were protecting your kind, union thug terrorist criminal network

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

Nice try dunce, but the IRS has already testified the emails no longer exist.

I'm talking about the content of the emails. The content that will show Darrell Issa demanded the IRS limit any and all investigations of "persecuted" non-profits to only right wing outfits.

 

[Busybody]

its something I said all along

they claim its lost

there will be an outcry

they will "find" it, and there will be nothing on it....cause THE REAL SHIT IS ALREADY DESTROYED


and Obama gets to buy a $5 million house

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

More BS. They might find mention of demands by Cummings, Levin, and Schumer, however.

Wishful thinking by you again, of course.

When they don't find a smoking gun, I'll be back to rub your nose in it, and you of course will bellow prove it and when I do you'll pretend like I never did.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[dan_c00000]

This has got to be a "worst case" scenario for Darrell Issa.

If all the tapes have been recovered then he will be exposed as having orchestrated a fraud upon the American public.

Naturally, he'll spin it otherwise and enlist folks like Vetty to continue to spread the deception....

The phrase of "possibility they might contain" probably made vette have whatever the right wing version of an orgasm is.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

The phrase of "possibility they might contain" probably made vette have whatever the right wing version of an orgasm is.

are you really LJ?

 

[Busybody]

Poop....you must be proud DementedDanny is reading you

 

[Que]

Hard to imagine a gun barrel smoking months after it has been carefully cleaned with Hoppes #9.

Even when there are strikingly revealing emails uncovered the usual suspects shrug.

The concept of "preponderance of the evidence" is entirely foreign to them. The standard seems to be that unless an alien could convict beyond a reasonable doubt on the strength of any individual piece of evidence on its own, it isn't "evidence." Much less examining all the available documents, the conveniently missing ones and drawing the conclusion a five year old would be able to make.

 

[Wanderer0327]

A chain of custody which cannot be verified makes the "backups" irrelevant whether they contain damning evidence or not. The testimonies of the officials at the IRS and its former backup subcontractor directly undercut the verifiability of the "found materials."

Unless the material has an unimpeachable chain of custody, it is meaningless.

 

[DooleyDarter]

who knows, they could have just re-created emails in their own likeness and say " Lookie here folks,, see told ya all along that ole Lois and her buddy Obama didn't do nuttin wrong all along. See right here the email that Obama sent to Lois,,,, Lois, please make sure that the tea party folks are treated fairly would ya"?

 

[KingOrfeo]

The true strategy of the IRS will emerge on August 10.

What happens on August 10?

 

[adventrkupl]

What happens on August 10?

White Sox day at Arlington Park

 

[RobDownSouth]

What happens on August 10?

The judge asked for a sworn explanation from the IRS about their email policy and data loss by August 10th.

 

[Que]

He has no interest in their email "policy." which has been code for "shrug" amongst IRS apologists.

He wanted to know first specifically why they neglected to inform his court that they "lost" the discoverable material.

ANY entity is REQUIRED to safeguard discoverable materials just as soon as you become aware that someone wants to discover them.

A federal judge on Thursday ordered the IRS to explain under oath how it lost a trove of emails to and from a central figure in the agency's tea party controversy.

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan gave the tax agency a month to submit the explanation in writing. Sullivan said he is also appointing a federal magistrate to see whether the lost emails can be obtained from other sources.

Sullivan issued the order as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group. He said the IRS declaration must be signed, under oath, by the appropriate IRS official.

"I'm going to hold tight to that Aug. 10 declaration," Sullivan said.

The deadline of August 10th is to give an accurate, under oath accounting for the timeline between when the Emails were generated and the latest "oops we don't have them months and years after they were requested."

Now that an actual non-political nerd at the IRS will have to swear on a stack of Bibles under penalty of going to jail that they are gone and there was NEVER a way to recover them, suddenly they "think" they might have them.

Interesting that the IRS respects a random judge over their actual masters, congress, that can shrink their budget to zero and fire everyone. The IRS does most of its dirty work outside of an actual courtroom, they have their own proceedings that don't require due process and the rule of law. They get to MAKE the law they rule on. It is fun watching the bastards squirm, and it is un-American to cheer for the IRS.

 

[Ishmael]

You can sure as hell tell that that was taken from the AP.

"Sullivan issued the order as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group. He said the IRS declaration must be signed, under oath, by the appropriate IRS official."

Judicial Watch has sued every damn administration since its creation in 1994. And the founder, Larry Klayman's history of suing administrations predates the founding of the organization.

When Klayman was suing the Bush administration the press referred to them as "non-partisan." *chuckle* Hell, even the Wiki entry has been edited recently.

Ishmael

 

[Que]

You can sure as hell tell that that was taken from the AP.

"Sullivan issued the order as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group. He said the IRS declaration must be signed, under oath, by the appropriate IRS official."

Judicial Watch has sued every damn administration since its creation in 1994. And the founder, Larry Klayman's history of suing administrations predates the founding of the organization.

When Klayman was suing the Bush administration the press referred to them as "non-partisan." *chuckle* Hell, even the Wiki entry has been edited recently.

Ishmael

If the ACLU in a pique of intellectual honesty sued the Obama Administration over any number of issues, the AP would say "The ACLU- a front for the racist Tea party groups, filed briefs today against the administration's current policy on..."

I deliberately chose a source with a liberal slant. Cuts down on the usual suspects screaming about "Faux news." ....as if they read the wires anyway.

I thought Faux News was a new Vietnamese noodle place.

Of course if Fox or Breitbart or whomever takes the wire store and scrubs it of inaccurate and gratuitous bias, that is considered propaganda.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

was UD on one of the jets that crashed? oh wait, UD can't afford a vacation on obama welfare plan. I would love to hear how UD would spin this...

 

[about_average]

You can sure as hell tell that that was taken from the AP.

"Sullivan issued the order as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group. He said the IRS declaration must be signed, under oath, by the appropriate IRS official."

Yeah, you sure got 'em. LMAO

About Judicial Watch

Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law.

http://www.judicialwatch.org/about/