White Woman Sentenced To 10 Years For Sex With Friend's 12-Year-Old Son

Ten fucking years!!! It’s nice to see a woman get the book thrown at her for raping a kid but damn, let’s be honest here, the only time you see sentences of that magnitude for one rape victim in a nonviolent case like this, are for black men. She got a bigger sentence than the Steubenville duo combined (2 years apiece) plus the guy who hacked and exposed the Steubenville rapists (5 years).

5 years is probably the average. Who the hell did this woman piss off in the justice system?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/14/joy-mccall-sentenced-sex-with-boy_n_5583950.html

You don't have to be Black. If a man fucks a 12 year old girl, he will be lucky that he does not get life.
 
He'll be lucky if he makes it out of 3 years in general population alive....

They do not put them in general population unless the guy asked to be placed there. It usually isn't long that they ask for protective custody if they survive.
 
You don't have to be Black. If a man fucks a 12 year old girl, he will be lucky that he does not get life.

I helped get parole for a guy who was convicted of statutory rape. He got 40 years. And before people start screaming, he never even had intercourse with her. Admittedly he shouldn't have had his hands in her pants, but that certainly does not justify making the rest of us pay $30,000 a year to keep him locked up.

He won't be doing it again. I told him myself that if I ever heard of him playing with 14-year old girls again I would personally go over there and shoot him.

End of problem.
 
Ten years does seem like a lot for statutory rape when the "victim" was cooperating with her. I wonder if this southern judge would have given her that same sentence if the boy had been white. :confused:
 


You know, I rarely respond to LJ's thread but this is the bullshit that really pisses me off. These types of responses. So because she is 'hot' cause she has big boobies :rolleyes: she is forgiven and that makes it ok? And these types of responses are usually perpetrated by men. Patting some kid in the back for screwing an older woman :rolleyes:I bet if she was ugly the response would have been different.

How different the tune would be had this situation involved a 12 year old girl. This lady is sick and desperate, what can a 12 year old boy do? They stink and don't even know themselves yet. I don't date lower than 25.
 
Last edited:
You know, I rarely respond to LJ's thread but this is the bullshit that really pisses me off. These types of responses. So because she is 'hot' cause she has big boobies :rolleyes: she is forgiven and that makes it ok? And these types of responses are usually perpetrated by men. Patting some kid in the back for screwing an older woman :rolleyes:I bet if she was ugly the response would have been different.

How different the tune would be had this situation involved a 12 year old girl. This lady is sick and desperate, what can a 12 year old boy do? They stink and don't even know themselves yet. I don't date lower than 25.

I don't know what her motivation was, but I can tell you from personal experience that 12-year old boys will stick it into anything warm and wet. And also things that are not.
 
yea at 12, Ida banged her till my dick fell off, seems like she coulda done better than pulling a preteen tho
 
Sending her to jail harms the 12 year old...why criminalize every tweenager's fantasy....getting a blowjob from the curvy Teacher???
 
yea at 12, Ida banged her till my dick fell off, seems like she coulda done better than pulling a preteen tho

Maybe it was just a sex education lesson taken a little too far. :D

I suspect he was rather more mature than most 12-year olds. And probably has a big dick. :eek:
 
Sending her to jail harms the 12 year old...why criminalize every tweenager's fantasy....getting a blowjob from the curvy Teacher???

If that's all it was, I thought Bill Clinton established by Executive Order that blowjobs do not count as sex.

Seriously, though, if everyone is so concerned with trauma and emotional damage to this kid (utter horseshit) making such a big deal out of it will not help. The only way he's going to suffer PTSD over this is if people tell him he should.
 
You know, I rarely respond to LJ's thread but this is the bullshit that really pisses me off. These types of responses. So because she is 'hot' cause she has big boobies :rolleyes: she is forgiven and that makes it ok? And these types of responses are usually perpetrated by men. Patting some kid in the back for screwing an older woman :rolleyes:I bet if she was ugly the response would have been different.

How different the tune would be had this situation involved a 12 year old girl. This lady is sick and desperate, what can a 12 year old boy do? They stink and don't even know themselves yet. I don't date lower than 25.
On this forum people have openly said that it is clearly different if it was a 12 year old girl with a grown man.

Openly.

Which is why I laugh out loud whenever these fucktards call me crazy.
 
No, I hadn't heard. Just looked it up, and found:

http://i0.wp.com/voices.avoiceformen.com/mgtow/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2014/03/Morioka-Table-1.png?resize=542%2C468

Doesn't sound like most women would object to this at all.

And there are guys who are completely asexual. I have known exactly one such under the age of 70.

And there are guys who are completely gay but afraid to admit it, even to themselves.

I wonder if some of this is due to extreme overpopulation? Any place I've been in Japan was so crowded it gave me the heebie-jeebies.

Now I'm wondering if a trip to Japan might not be such a bad idea... :D
Number one, never bring up A Voice for Men.

Number two, never bring up A Voice for Men.

I'm a men's rights activist but I do not give credibility to an organization whose leader says he'd acquit ALL men charged with rape, or a guy who keeps verbally beating on feminists while they are waving the white diplomacy flag trying to empathize with MRAs after MRAs went nuts ripping her a new one. And a bunch of other people in that organization are also extremists like he is. AVfM is like Literotica's General Board but for men's rights.

About herbivore men:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120696816

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2009/06/the_herbivores_dilemma.html

I applaud Herbivore Men. They're essentially Men Going Their Own Way, Japanese style. They don't throw themselves at women, your little story of "you have a pussy you can get all the dick you want" doesn't work with them, women can't sexually manipulate them, Japanese women are becoming completely RUDDERLESS as a result.

No woman can arrest men for not participating in the courtship game. No woman can file rape charges, or assault charges, or cry "stare-rape" or anything. They're powerless to do jack shit to men when they decide not to chase the pussy.

The way to destroy female power and wipe out hypergamy - and destroy the culture of male expendability - is not through violence or conflict with women. Men achieve victory by peaceful non-participation.

Women have relied on the power of the pussy for hundreds of years.. no wait, thousands.. actually they've been doing it since the dawn of fucking time. Manipulating men, getting men to fight for them and die for them and conquer one another for the sake of women.

Women are completely fucking unprepared and unable to adapt to that day when men decide they're not going to play that Hunger Games bullshit anymore. They have nothing up their sleeves if they can't manipulate some dude to get what they want.

Herbivore Men proved that this isn't just theory, it's fact. Since the Herbivore Man craze started, the Host Bar business in Japan has EXPLODED. Japanese women already were going to Host Bars and paying NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS a shot to experience being romanced by a guy before Herbivore men came along, but afterwards it skyrocketed in popularity. Yes, you heard it right, regular working class women pay to be romanced in Japan. LOTS of them, because Herbivore Men became a thing.

In America women know that if one guy refuses to bow to the power of the pussy, 9 others will kill each other over her. But that shit's going to change.

Take a look at what's going on in Seattle right now. Imagine that... everywhere. Writ large.

Women are about to get their comeuppance. Nonviolently. It's fucking great. And I'm gonna live to see it.
 
My experience with the Criminal Justice System has shown me, that any man accused of having sex with a girl aged 14 and below, has a 75% chance of conviction, no matter what evidence is presented, or if there is any evidence beyond the victims testimony.
 
Number One: I don't know what the hell you're talking about.

Number Two: If you tell me never to do something, it practically guarantees that I will. So don't bother.

Number Three: You're delusional if you think the male/female dynamic is ever going to change significantly. If a large number of men decide to be stand-offish, women will just have to be a little more aggressive. Those guys will cave. We're programmed that way deep in the DNA database, and for good reason.

The world doesn't need a 1:1 male/female ratio. All sorts of religious and political subterfuges have been set up to make that work, but not very successfully. In fact, males of most species kill each other off quite joyfully because they're not necessary to the survival of the species. Females are.

They are obviously, therefore, superior in that regard.
 
If the genders were reversed, everyone would be up in arms over the light sentence, even if the victim "cooperated." 12 is far too young to consent, PERIOD!
 
. So because she is 'hot' cause she has big boobies :rolleyes: she is forgiven and that makes it ok?

Who wants to forgive her?

I’m quite content thinking of those big shapely bobbies swinging free as she's grudge fucked in the shower by a dyke with a 12” strap-on.

<sits back> yeah!

Woof!
 
My experience with the Criminal Justice System has shown me, that any man accused of having sex with a girl aged 14 and below, has a 75% chance of conviction, no matter what evidence is presented, or if there is any evidence beyond the victims testimony.

I don't doubt your observations in the slightest. In fact 75% might be low. Most defendants will never go to trial, because they'll be offered a plea bargain such as my friend was: plead guilty to a reduced charge or you'll get 40 years.

His lawyer was a douchebag. He would have been better off with the public defender. He got 40 years anyway, and he never even had intercourse with her. The prosecutor had "deep religious convictions" and so did the judge who gave him 2 twenty-year sentences to be served concurrently.

The prosecutor did not feel that this was sufficient so changed it to "consecutively." I actually saw a copy of the sentencing document--it was clearly scratched out and changed.

Didn't matter. No one gave a shit. It's not a basis for appeal, especially when you plead guilty.

But anyway, the vagaries of the Criminal Injustice system are not really the topic here, so please forgive me for ranting.

Just because men are getting screwed by the system is no reason why women should too. Just leave the woman alone, for Christ's sake. I don't want to have to pay to keep people like her locked up. Send her for psychiatric treatment or something that might help. Shit.
 
Last edited:
If the genders were reversed, everyone would be up in arms over the light sentence, even if the victim "cooperated." 12 is far too young to consent, PERIOD!

It's not too young to be tried as an adult and sentenced to life in prison...

Or to get on the zero-tolerance school-to-prison railroad which is most active, particularly for brown or black boys.

This is just more of the same tired old Puritanical bullshit. The kid was not harmed in any way. A female child of that age would have been. There IS a difference.
 
It's not too young to be tried as an adult and sentenced to life in prison...

Or to get on the zero-tolerance school-to-prison railroad which is most active, particularly for brown or black boys.

This is just more of the same tired old Puritanical bullshit. The kid was not harmed in any way. A female child of that age would have been. There IS a difference.

Bullfuckingshit!!

This is the same fucking shit that male pedophiles use when they attack boys that age!

Harm IS done, for fuck's sake!
 
No 12 year old boy has ever been harmed by otherwise normal sex with a girl or woman. A 12 year old boy being anally raped by a man is another matter entirely. :mad:
 
Such as....?

No 12 year old boy has ever been harmed by otherwise normal sex with a girl or woman. A 12 year old boy being anally raped by a man is another matter entirely. :mad:

You two, along with others, are so fucking thinking with your dicks!

Harm is done. Let's see...

This boy now thinks that he can fuck anyone he wants without consequence - because men like you think he's fine psychologically

This boy now is placed on a stage, shown as some kind of stud.


Christ. Sex IS sex. So it's okay because he consented. What if he consented to anal sex with another man? That's different, why? Why is a girl of that age consenting DIFFERENT than a boy?

I want to fucking know, Lit Psychologists!
 
Back
Top