Peaceful Muslims

[IrezumiKiss]

I'll read a Bunny Slippers post

Dude. You'd do less damage to your eyes by looking at a solar eclipse straight-on without sunglasses!

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[Boxlicker101]

Your point?

Most serial killers are male.

Most domestic terrorists are white Christian males.

Most murders of children under 5 are committed by their biological fathers. However, of children under 5 killed by someone other than their parent, 80% were killed by males.

I would take issue with the last two statements. I do not believe most domestic terrorists, at least currently, are white Christian males.

I also don't believe most killings of young children are by their fathers. I believe mothers kill their young more often than fathers and that a substantial number of young children are killed by people who are not their parents. ETA: I do agree that most non-parental killers are males.

Please note I said killings, not murders. The reason is that some mothers get off on insanity pleas.

 

[Busybody]

I'll read a Bunny Slippers post if you answer this question: Did the 9/11 attacks bring you to your knees?

STFU, NIGGER DOH!

 

[Busybody]

DHS Adviser: “Inaccurate” To Say Islamism Is A Threat To America…


Senior DHS Adviser Mohamed Elibiari at it again.


http://weaselzippers.us/wp-content/uploads/Screen-shot-2014-06-27-at-10.42.23-AM-550x301.png

a terrorist works for the State Dept in DHS

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Busybody]

Our old friend Mohamed Elibiary.

Via Free Beacon:


A controversial senior adviser to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is receiving criticism for tweeting that the recent takeover of Iraqi cities by a violent terror group is proof that a Muslim “caliphate” is making an “inevitable” return.

Mohamed Elibiary, a controversial figure and member of DHS’s Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC), discussed what he described as the “inevitable” return of a Muslim caliphate Friday on Twitter.

“As I’ve said b4 inevitable that ‘Caliphate’ returns,” Elibiary tweeted in response to a question about the terror group Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), which is currently seeking to overthrow the Iraqi government and instate strict Sharia law in the country.

“Choice only whether we support [European Union] like Muslim Union vision or not,” wrote Elibiary, who has “advised numerous federal, state and local law enforcement organizations on homeland security-related matter,” according to his biography on DHS’s website.

Elibiary has come under heavy criticism in the past for claiming that America is “an Islamic country with an Islamically compliant constitution.” Critics have said that such rhetoric makes him unfit to serve as an adviser for DHS, which is tasked with defending the U.S. border from terrorism.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Brigitte Gabriel most certainly DID answer the Muslim woman's question. She answered it by eloquently demonstrating that it was the wrong question to ask. Her analogies of German and Japanese moderates' tepid responses to Nazism and Japanese imperialism respectively ought to hammer home two points that even the most obtuse members of this forum cannot miss:

1. Radical practitioners of any doctrine have a way of making an impact far beyond that suggested by their smaller numbers relative to a moderate majority.

2. The point of war is not to eradicate whatever aberrant philosophy may be a primary motivation for an enemy's aggression, but rather simply to deter to the greatest extent possible the enemy's ability to effectively wage that aggression. The Allied victory in World War II is not judged as victorious from the perspective of whether skinhead Nazi extremist groups managed to exist in post-war America or Western Europe. Japanese imperialism is no less vanquished if one somehow unearthed the present day existence of a Hideki Tojo fan club on some otherwise unpopulated Pacific atoll.

Perhaps because of prisons' poor track record at rehabilitation, it is a common misconception that the primary goal of imprisonment is to rehabilitate. Nonsense. The primary goal of incarceration is to protect innocent law abiding potential victims from criminal predators.

A similar misconception is routinely misapplied in the war against radical Islam. The Muslim woman who Ms. Gabriel addressed should know this as well as or better than anyone else. In the eyes of radical Islamists, an Islamic infidel is no less worthy of beheading than any other infidel. Sunni and Shia Muslims have been at each others throats, literally, for centuries.

Address the ideology? Why don't you tell us, sweetheart? How's that been working out for you so far?

 

[Busybody]

Brigitte Gabriel most certainly DID answer the Muslim woman's question. She answered it by eloquently demonstrating that it was the wrong question to ask. Her analogies of German and Japanese moderates' tepid responses to Nazism and Japanese imperialism respectively ought to hammer home two points that even the most obtuse members of this forum cannot miss:

1. Radical practitioners of any doctrine have a way of making an impact far beyond that suggested by their smaller numbers relative to a moderate majority.

2. The point of war is not to eradicate whatever aberrant philosophy may be a primary motivation for an enemy's aggression, but rather simply to deter to the greatest extent possible the enemy's ability to effectively wage that aggression. The Allied victory in World War II is not judged as victorious from the perspective of whether skinhead Nazi extremist groups managed to exist in post-war America or Western Europe. Japanese imperialism is no less vanquished if one somehow unearthed the present day existence of a Hideki Tojo fan club on some otherwise unpopulated Pacific atoll.

Perhaps because of prisons' poor track record at rehabilitation, it is a common misconception that the primary goal of imprisonment is to rehabilitate. Nonsense. The primary goal of incarceration is to protect innocent law abiding potential victims from criminal predators.

A similar misconception is routinely misapplied in the war against radical Islam. The Muslim woman who Ms. Gabriel addressed should know this as well as or better than anyone else. In the eyes of radical Islamists, an Islamic infidel is no less worthy of beheading than any other infidel. Sunni and Shia Muslims have been at each others throats, literally, for centuries.

Address the ideology? Why don't you tell us, sweetheart? How's that been working out for you so far?

Long, too fucking long....but damn good

except for the HIGHLIGHTED

all polls show PRO JIHADISTS are in the majority

600 million PLUS

 

[Busybody]

Hey yo, Hogan

You a smart guy

Why do LIBZ so feverishly DEFEND Muslims/Islam?

Why do women, why do gays?

Makes NO sense to me, but Im not so smart

 

[nowisthetime]

Your point?

Most serial killers are male.

Most domestic terrorists are white Christian males.

Most murders of children under 5 are committed by their biological fathers. However, of children under 5 killed by someone other than their parent, 80% were killed by males.

But THIS is interesting.. From that liberal rag The Economist.

Catholic and non-Catholic countries tended to have a higher than average overall crime rate.

The chart’s y-axis shows the extent to which each country’s overall crime rate deviates from the average overall crime rate of the 67 countries considered. For each of the ten crimes for which the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime had reliable national statistics (theft, say), the authors of the paper ascertained an average global crime rate—and then worked out each country’s deviation from that rate. The country’s overall crime rate, as shown in the y-axis, is an average of its ten deviations from the ten means of those individual crime rates.

Researchers found that the degree to which each country’s citizens believed more strongly in heaven than in hell predicted higher national crime rates. It seems that believing more strongly in the forgiveness of sins than in punishment in the after-life may help pave the way for further transgressions.

Don't kill them with knowledge!

 

[Busybody]

crime is not terror

fuck you BOTH

hopefully BOTH will be BEHEADED

 

[nowisthetime]

Hey yo, Hogan

You a smart guy

Why do LIBZ so feverishly DEFEND Muslims/Islam?

Why do women, why do gays?

Makes NO sense to me, but Im not so smart

You are too stupid for words.

What a bitter guy...if I had to hump on some saggy, pale, haggard, flat assed dog every night, I'd be upset too.

Or maybe your left hand is your wife?

 

[nowisthetime]

crime is not terror

fuck you BOTH

hopefully BOTH will be BEHEADED

Hopefully some AIDS infested cunt would bite off your 4 inch cock and you'd bleed to death.

 

[Liar]

Please don't feed the gremlin. It's always after midnight somewhere.

 

[nowisthetime]

a few?

The problem with some of you, no one likes to be demonized. It's all about US versus THEM, which is the mentality that I see with those on the far right.

Of course most white Christian males don't want to be demonized as serial killing, pedophiles, racist bigots but it's perfectly fine for some to antagonize other groups of people simply because they are 'the other'.

 

[nowisthetime]

Please don't feed the gremlin. It's always after midnight somewhere.

The gremlin deserves it. I never attacked him until he attacked me. He deserves all the venom that gets thrown at him. He probably jacks off to women with round brown asses on the downlow that's why he spends all his time bashing me.

 

[garbage can]

Got a source for those assertions?

The hijab is a but a local custom and not germaine to the discussion. You are deflecting from reality in defense of the indefensible. Everything you've had to say is irrelevant.

Ishmael

The poor twit hasn't said anything yet.

'cept her vile insults.

 

[nowisthetime]

The poor twit hasn't said anything yet.

'cept her vile insults.

Are you referring to me? Did you not see what Bunny slippers and vetteman wrote?


Whoever gets insulted by me deserves it.

I never started insulting anyone until they came at me. But of course ignore all the racial slurs thrown on here by your fellow far right butt buddies.


But it's fine when it comes from your side. As soon as I wish to defend myself, I become the bad twit.

Jackass. I love how some of you little boys take sides for each other.


"Derp, I got ya back buddy"

Catty

 

[nowisthetime]

Got a source for those assertions?

The hijab is a but a local custom and not germaine to the discussion. You are deflecting from reality in defense of the indefensible. Everything you've had to say is irrelevant.

Ishmael

SOME of those on the far right hate it when someone with both melanin and a vagina tries to correct them, thus, the venom thrown at me on this thread. Nothing surprises me.


It was your fellow right wingers on here who were bemoaning how bad Islam is to women, how evil the religion is to the world.

Why do you turn around and twist my words? No one is forced to wear the hijab, thus women are given a choice on what they choose to wear in many cultures. What do you mean I am defending the indefensible? This is from a guy who categorized a whole group of people as cockroaches?

 

[unregistered]

 

[Disgustipated]

She was a bitch as soon as she showed up. Just joined this month but knows Lit history, Iggy alt time.

Where's the post about lit history, dummy?

 

[nowisthetime]

She was a bitch as soon as she showed up. Just joined this month but knows Lit history, Iggy alt time.

I'm not an alternate username, I know it makes you feel better.

Oh I can be sweet and sensual if one deserves it. But I have no mercy for hateful gutter rats.

You can't even address me like a man but refer to me in third person. What a bitch boy.

I'm on ignore but your mind is so focused on me.

Face it,

I am smarter than you


I am sexier than you

I am cuter than you

I am better than you

Keep living in your hateful mind.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

She was a bitch as soon as she showed up. Just joined this month but knows Lit history, Iggy alt time.

Where's the post about lit history, dummy?

It only takes less than one week to suss out the characters of all these shitstains, flameouts, schmucks, pricks and assorted assholes in the same club drinking from the same cup.

That's how loud they are, broadcasting their bullshit that everyone with an internet connection to this place can immediately see. And his fraudulent ass can't figure out how someone can tag him and his buddy skidmark brigade so quickly and succinctly.

What a fucking pussy. Semper fi-dull-us must be their motto.

 

[Boxlicker101]

SOME of those on the far right hate it when someone with both melanin and a vagina tries to correct them, thus, the venom thrown at me on this thread. Nothing surprises me.


It was your fellow right wingers on here who were bemoaning how bad Islam is to women, how evil the religion is to the world.

Why do you turn around and twist my words? No one is forced to wear the hijab, thus women are given a choice on what they choose to wear in many cultures. What do you mean I am defending the indefensible? This is from a guy who categorized a whole group of people as cockroaches?

Let's face it. Islam IS very bad to women. I'm sure you have heard of Sharia Law and "honor" killings and the way women are treated, even in some relatively modern Muslim countries.

I'm not saying about the hijab. I see many women wearing the head scarf and have no negative thoughts about the garment. But what about the burka? Given the chance, the Taliban kill women who do not wear them.

Do you really believe the Islamic treatment of women is defensible?

 

[Skiddles2014]

All I hear is American victims whining about terrorists and pissing their little panties over a bunch of fucking nomads who can't even afford a fucking camel.

95% of these scary boogeymen want you and your bullshit interests out of their country. You create these monsters you're all so fucking paranoid about. Iraqi's used to respect and like Americans, now they'd rather drag your sorry asses through the streets. Can't say that I blame them either.

Keep winning the hearts and minds folks, teach them what freedom is all about.

 

[nowisthetime]

It only takes less than one week to suss out the characters of all these shitstains, flameouts, schmucks, pricks and assorted assholes in the same club drinking from the same cup.

That's how loud they are, broadcasting their bullshit that everyone with an internet connection to this place can immediately see. And his fraudulent ass can't figure out how someone can tag him and his buddy skidmark brigade so quickly and succinctly.

What a fucking pussy. Semper fi-dull-us must be their motto.

It doesn't take a while to snuff out the smelly poop on here. I tend to lurk before I join forums. And he is a fake Marine.

They like to point out others as alternative screenames because they find it hard to believe not everyone wants to kiss their ass and support their beliefs.

Let's face it. Islam IS very bad to women. I'm sure you have heard of Sharia Law and "honor" killings and the way women are treated, even in some relatively modern Muslim countries.

I'm not saying about the hijab. I see many women wearing the head scarf and have no negative thoughts about the garment. But what about the burka? Given the chance, the Taliban kill women who do not wear them.

Do you really believe the Islamic treatment of women is defensible?

I feel like I am repeating myself, who denies that there is wrongdoing in some Islamic cultures? Who said that? However, there is wrongdoing in all cultures. Power hungry assholes fill the world.

Do you know any Muslims personally? Have you traveled to a Muslim country? Or do you choose to only see the negative? The way women are treated? So all women are treated the same way? The burka represents all Muslim societies?


In true Islam, the husband and wife have a mutual love and respect for each other. Of course there are assholes who want to twist their belief. There are chauvinists everywhere. There are men in the western world who impregnate multiple women. There are deadbeat dads. There are men who beat and date rape women as well, high crime rates, broken families, high rates of adultery, out of wedlock births, badass kids, and divorce, etc Does that define the western world?

DOES IT?


Again you are defining an entire culture on the worst scenarios, which is another arrogant way of thinking that the far right tends to hold. The far right tends to think the worst about ANYONE who differs from their beliefs!