Mr. Speaker! We Need To Get Back To Benghazi

It is also possible they are waiting until the past two Secretaries of State can decide when and if they can deign to answer questions about the people that worked at State, and both Secretaries' joint obstruction of previous investigations.

My guess is Kerry, who wasn't involved in the incident, but has not assisted the investigation(s) will bluster a while longer then start turning over records.

You don't have to (and shouldn't) start public hearings while you are still hiring investigators and researchers, collating documents, preparing to take depositions of staff and the like.

Makes you nervous waiting though doesn't it?
 
Last edited:
It is also possible they are waiting until the past two Secretaries of State can decide when and if they can deign to answer questions about the people that worked at State, and both Secretaries' joint obstruction of previous investigations.

My guess is Kerry, who wasn't involved in the incident, but has not assisted the investigation(s) will bluster a while longer then start turning over records.

You don't have to (and shouldn't) start public hearings while you are still hiring investigators and researchers, collating documents, preparing to take depositions of staff and the like.

Makes you nervous waiting though doesn't it?

Nervous? I can hardly wait, because if it goes down the way I believe it will the House GOP is going to look like obsessed tin-foil hat wearing morons.

You know, as opposed to just looking like morons.
 
Nervous? I can hardly wait, because if it goes down the way I believe it will the House GOP is going to look like obsessed tin-foil hat wearing morons.

You know, as opposed to just looking like morons.

GREAT!

So you are FINALLY in favor of the hearings. Nice to have you on board now.
 
GREAT!

So you are FINALLY in favor of the hearings. Nice to have you on board now.

Actually, I think it's going to be a HUGE waste of time and money that would be better spent oh I dunno.. Actually legislating.

But the GOP has committed itself. I'm just waiting for it to all fall to pieces on them... AGAIN.
 
Not only have they not had a single meeting, they don't even know WHEN the first meeting will take place yet.

Trey Gowdy must be so busy putting together his prosecution.. *ahem* "investigation" that he hasn't had time to write down an itinerary for the upcoming meetings.

I imagine they're waiting for late September, maybe October. They need to prolong the "uncertainty" until the mid-terms are over at least.

That's a long-assed wait for a desperation punt, though.

They better put all the power they can into that kick, because this is the last shot they will ever have before quintupling down on the party's near-maxed out credit card...and they're not even starting from inside the stadium! :D
 
Actually, I think it's going to be a HUGE waste of time and money that would be better spent oh I dunno.. Actually legislating.

But the GOP has committed itself. I'm just waiting for it to all fall to pieces on them... AGAIN.

So you think they should send another mountain of passed bills to Harry Reid's desk,why?

The voters of 2012 did not send a record number of Republicans to go pass bills that Democrats would love.

They were sent primarily to stop Obamacare...something they have singularly failed at. Shall they keep trying that?
 
*L* the only thing that asshole will bring to a vote is a vote on dismantling the constitution in its entirely and mainge a democrat the Grand Pubah.

If that's true do your fucking job and pass the legislation. It's of course not true he'd pass a jobs bill in a heart beat.
 
They should try passing something that Harry Reid will bring to a vote.

Given how vested Reid is in calling them 'The party of Po" while he refuses even debate...I am not sure there is anything he would pass.

He would pass things that Republicans completely disagree with, but why would they offer that?

In all the bills on his desk, there is NO common ground? Nothing that he could bring to the floor and say, hey, I am attaching this amendment to gut such and such nonsense, but this idea right here has some merit.

It is true that we are at loggerheads between the two parties based on the realities of where the votes are. That is how things are designed, to prevent silly legislation from being adopted. The system failed when Obamacare was passed. Even if you were loving the direction and maybe even wanted it to go further it is a poorly thought out, poorly crafted piece of legislation.

It was dumped together out of every kitchen sink wish list moldering in desk drawers for the last couple of decades. Student loan takeover? what did that have to do with this? etc etc.

Bills ARE supposed to start in the House, but Obamacare in its final version was a senate bill. He COULD send something in the ballpark to the House and let them debate, craft, amend it and send it back...compromise for democrats means republicans leaning their way only.

Point to any piece of legislation that Democrats actually bent on their own principles. And no, not taking Obamacare even FARTHER towards single payer does not count. that was not compromise with republicans that was putting lipstick on it to minimize the howls already coming from the public in town hall meetings.
 
That was a compromise. I don't honestly believe the Republicans have passed any bill that even had the possibility of middle ground. It's part of the play.
 
I am so happy we are finally getting back to Benghazi. The biggest failure of the Dubyah Bush administration's policy on terrorism.

Have you all in the RWCj had a chance to Google Abu Sufian bin Qumu yet?
 
I am so happy we are finally getting back to Benghazi. The biggest failure of the Dubyah Bush administration's policy on terrorism.

Have you all in the RWCj had a chance to Google Abu Sufian bin Qumu yet?

Did you ever answer the question about this tacit admission on your part that releasing these guys will cause more American deaths? I thought Obama was better than Bush, from Day one with announcing the closing of Gitmo, but then he spent six years being the third and fourth terms of Bush.

Why is that?

If Bush was so wrong, then why did Obama not do the Wright thing, unless, of course, Bush was more right than wrong. I know you think you have a valid point on the face of it, but you never looked past the hiring of the glazier...

;) ;)

... in this case that would be the serious charge of "hypocrisy."
__________________
A_J's corollary #5, “When lacking reason and sound argument, the New Age Liberal charges headlong into ‘debate’ with emotional cries of Hypocrisy. The New Age Liberal is, of course, immune to and incapable of Hypocrisy. That would require hard and fast standards.”
 
It is also possible they are waiting until the past two Secretaries of State can decide when and if they can deign to answer questions about the people that worked at State, and both Secretaries' joint obstruction of previous investigations.

My guess is Kerry, who wasn't involved in the incident, but has not assisted the investigation(s) will bluster a while longer then start turning over records.

You don't have to (and shouldn't) start public hearings while you are still hiring investigators and researchers, collating documents, preparing to take depositions of staff and the like.

Makes you nervous waiting though doesn't it?
It is also possible that they are hoping Santa will bring them some evidence for Christmas.
 
Did you ever answer the question about this tacit admission on your part that releasing these guys will cause more American deaths? I thought Obama was better than Bush, from Day one with announcing the closing of Gitmo, but then he spent six years being the third and fourth terms of Bush.

Why is that?

If Bush was so wrong, then why did Obama not do the Wright thing, unless, of course, Bush was more right than wrong. I know you think you have a valid point on the face of it, but you never looked past the hiring of the glazier...

;) ;)

... in this case that would be the serious charge of "hypocrisy."
__________________
A_J's corollary #5, “When lacking reason and sound argument, the New Age Liberal charges headlong into ‘debate’ with emotional cries of Hypocrisy. The New Age Liberal is, of course, immune to and incapable of Hypocrisy. That would require hard and fast standards.”

I axed him that a few time in his threads

LOOK! A SQUIRREL
 
I am so happy we are finally getting back to Benghazi. The biggest failure of the Dubyah Bush administration's policy on terrorism.

Have you all in the RWCj had a chance to Google Abu Sufian bin Qumu yet?

Bush should be arrested for failing to protect the American people on 9/11 and also for releasing known terrorists who, once released, killed more Americans.

But let's ignore all that and point the blame at Obama, the RW 'tards are quite good at that, even when they are 100% wrong.
 
Did you just out yourself as a 13 year old boy? How obvious. Anyway, do you have any Benghazi proof yet or just a bill for the tax payer money you've wasted?

That "I know you are what am I" and "i'm rubber and you're glue" response is very popular among those guys.
 
The new line is, Hagel is to blame, he had final say. So, Obama is blameless, so it's safe to say it will cost lives. A Republican caused them.

The Fraud is incapable of accepting personal responsibility for anything.
 
Back
Top