A Gay Republican

Newsmax. It's for right wingers and pedos!

Also notice how the article says he is being "persecuted" because he is a Republican, not because he is gay?

Vette level of fail there, pedo.
 
And conservatives bash liberals for being Democrat. Very enlightening article.
 
Newsmax. It's for right wingers and pedos!

Also notice how the article says he is being "persecuted" because he is a Republican, not because he is gay?

Vette level of fail there, pedo.

Newsmax does have a right wing slant, but that doesn't mean they don't tell the truth. In this instance, the candidate is gay and a Republican, and that combination is why he is anathema to Liberals.

ETA: Conservatives do not look favorably on pedophiles. Although liberals think they, like other criminals, should be apologized to for the inconvenience and kept in luxury resorts, Conservatives are divided over whether pedos should be hanged or shot. Personally, I would vote for hanging.
 
Last edited:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post

Virtually the same thing could be said by Hispanics, women or African-Americans.

You don't state that these individuals are Republicans, so, no, they can't say that and neither can you.

The word "gay" in the original post was a miscue, so I have deleted it there and here. Even Liberals would have to admit their disdain for people such as Michelle Malkin, Ted Cruz, Clarence Thomas, Marco Rubio and many others whom they think should be part of their natural constituency.
 
The word "gay" in the original post was a miscue, so I have deleted it there and here. Even Liberals would have to admit their disdain for people such as Michelle Malkin, Ted Cruz, Clarence Thomas, Marco Rubio and many others whom they think should be part of their natural constituency.

'For people such as'.....

Oh, so now you're claiming that when someone isn't a white hetero male, that Democrats should embrace them with open arms?

Christ, you're on a really big level of stupid if you think I am going to embrace a cunt like Sara Palin who claims that "Waterboarding should be the new baptism".

Nice try, pedo.
 
'For people such as'.....

Oh, so now you're claiming that when someone isn't a white hetero male, that Democrats should embrace them with open arms?

Christ, you're on a really big level of stupid if you think I am going to embrace a cunt like Sara Palin who claims that "Waterboarding should be the new baptism".

Nice try, pedo.

I didn't mention Sarah Palin, but I would have included her if I had been making a comprehensive list. I am claiming that Liberals dislike Conservatives, but despise women, Hispanics gays, lesbians, and African Americans who are conservatives. And, if you are honest, you will admit I'm right.
 
I didn't mention Sarah Palin, but I would have included her if I had been making a comprehensive list. I am claiming that Liberals dislike Conservatives, but despise women, Hispanics gays, lesbians, and African Americans who are conservatives. And, if you are honest, you will admit I'm right.

Is that so? So you know that ever liberal despises any non-male non-white conservative? Gee, there's conservatives of every race and gender that I have not despised but would even vote for. Has nothing to do with their race, gender, or political leanings. It has to do deal with their policies, not their race nor gender.

You're just being disingenuous at best to argue something that is completely false, so it fits in your narrow-minded narrative.

Lay off writing the pedo stories, it really fucks with what left you have of a brain.
 
The word "gay" in the original post was a miscue, so I have deleted it there and here. Even Liberals would have to admit their disdain for people such as Michelle Malkin, Ted Cruz, Clarence Thomas, Marco Rubio and many others whom they think should be part of their natural constituency.

No, I have disdain for anybody who is working against their own self interest. If you aren't rich, white, male, and straight you should not vote Republican. And yes in that order. You're not only fucking yourself, you're fucking your people. You're no better than say Jane Fonda telling us that the Viet Cong were upstanding fellows. . .actually your worse because your joining them in the fight against your fellows.

A special spot in the Traitor Corps should be held for Ted "I was born in Canada but want to be President in a PArty that just finished spending years bitching about a Birth Certificate" Cruz. A man who could even spell respect would have dropped out of that party I dunno, six years ago?
 
Was that a jab at Obama because he can't?

Obama can spell, his weakness is that he can read. :rolleyes: It's one of the major differences between Bush and Obama, Bush was educated in Texas by Rednecks and can't read for shit and stumbled over a lot of shit because he had to sound it out. To his credit once Bush was talking off the cuff without a teleprompter he was if not brilliant extremely good and fairly charismatic.

Obama on the other hand can actually read and when you give him a teleprompter his mind settles on makings sure he looks good and sounds good but the words are passing through his eyes straight to his mouth with no pause which occasionally leads to hillarious fuck ups because he's just reading what's on the screen. Like Steve Carrel in Bruce Almighty. When Obama doesn't have his teleprompter however he starts jibbering, ah'ing and uhing all over the place. I can only imagine what a private conversation with him must be like.
 
Obama can spell, his weakness is that he can read. :rolleyes: It's one of the major differences between Bush and Obama, Bush was educated in Texas by Rednecks and can't read for shit and stumbled over a lot of shit because he had to sound it out. To his credit once Bush was talking off the cuff without a teleprompter he was if not brilliant extremely good and fairly charismatic.

Obama on the other hand can actually read and when you give him a teleprompter his mind settles on makings sure he looks good and sounds good but the words are passing through his eyes straight to his mouth with no pause which occasionally leads to hillarious fuck ups because he's just reading what's on the screen. Like Steve Carrel in Bruce Almighty. When Obama doesn't have his teleprompter however he starts jibbering, ah'ing and uhing all over the place. I can only imagine what a private conversation with him must be like.

I mostly agree with that.

How would you know if he can spell? I have heard he has a lot of input into the wording of his speeches, but as far as I know, no one has ever seen him show his work, let alone one of his spelling tests.
 
I mostly agree with that.

How would you know if he can spell? I have heard he has a lot of input into the wording of his speeches, but as far as I know, no one has ever seen him show his work, let alone one of his spelling tests.

I admit that was an assumption built on the fact that he can read. Corps men being pronounce Corpse men would support that he read the word. Like Colonel, corps is a word that either know how it's supposed to be said (and you're paying attention) or you don't (or you're not) and you pronounce it the way it looks like it should come out.

Its entirely possible however that he's a poor speller. The idea of a Harvard Professor who can't spell strikes me as about as unlikely as an oil tycoon who can't successfully rub elbows with people however. Certain skill sets tend to travel together.

I likewise don't know that Bush can BBQ, but I know which one of those two men I'm trusting with a steak.
 
Is that so? So you know that ever liberal despises any non-male non-white conservative? Gee, there's conservatives of every race and gender that I have not despised but would even vote for. Has nothing to do with their race, gender, or political leanings. It has to do deal with their policies, not their race nor gender.

You're just being disingenuous at best to argue something that is completely false, so it fits in your narrow-minded narrative.

Lay off writing the pedo stories, it really fucks with what left you have of a brain.

I wouldn't say that ever (do you mean every) Liberal despises such persons. However, they do so as a group, except they probably do not despise Asians. It is pretty much common knowledge that Libs do despise such persons, including LGBT people, as I mentioned and, if you have any doubts, you can read what such persons say and what is said by Liberals, including yourself.

How many threads have you seen on this forum castigating gays or African-Americans and calling them traitors to their race, etc.

What Conservatives have you ever voted for? I voted for LBJ in 1964 and HHH in 1968 and Clinton in 1996 and Kerry in 2004. I even voted for Obama in the 2008 primary election, although not in the general election.

ETA: Post 13 is a good example of what I mean.
 
Last edited:
No, I have disdain for anybody who is working against their own self interest. If you aren't rich, white, male, and straight you should not vote Republican. And yes in that order. You're not only fucking yourself, you're fucking your people. You're no better than say Jane Fonda telling us that the Viet Cong were upstanding fellows. . .actually your worse because your joining them in the fight against your fellows.

A special spot in the Traitor Corps should be held for Ted "I was born in Canada but want to be President in a PArty that just finished spending years bitching about a Birth Certificate" Cruz. A man who could even spell respect would have dropped out of that party I dunno, six years ago?

If you have disdain for anybody working against their own interests, that should include people of any race, gender or sexual persuasion who have prospered through their own endeavors and vote Liberal. Conservatives tend to believe people should be allowed to use most of the fruits of their labors to support themselves and their families and to otherwise spend or donate as they see fit. Liberals believe most of those fruits should be doled out to people who are unwilling to support themselves or their families, or who are unable to do so through their own choice.
 
If you have disdain for anybody working against their own interests, that should include people of any race, gender or sexual persuasion who have prospered through their own endeavors and vote Liberal. Conservatives tend to believe people should be allowed to use most of the fruits of their labors to support themselves and their families and to otherwise spend or donate as they see fit. Liberals believe most of those fruits should be doled out to people who are unwilling to support themselves or their families, or who are unable to do so through their own choice.

No such animal exists nor ever has. Those who think they are that mythical beast should be educated on the myriad of advantages they inherited from those who came before them.

Liberals do not beleive most of those fruits should be dolled out to those who are unwilling to support themselves or are unable to through their own choice. That's just more conservative bullshit. The fact is that liberals love what Americans claim is capitalism. Hard work=success. Liberals thrive on that every single day. Conservatives however believe luck=entitlement. And they fight anytime you challenge that part of their philosophy on which everything else is written.
 
I wouldn't say that ever (do you mean every) Liberal despises such persons. However, they do so as a group, except they probably do not despise Asians. It is pretty much common knowledge that Libs do despise such persons, including LGBT people, as I mentioned and, if you have any doubts, you can read what such persons say and what is said by Liberals, including yourself.

How many threads have you seen on this forum castigating gays or African-Americans and calling them traitors to their race, etc.

What Conservatives have you ever voted for? I voted for LBJ in 1964 and HHH in 1968 and Clinton in 1996 and Kerry in 2004. I even voted for Obama in the 2008 primary election, although not in the general election.

ETA: Post 13 is a good example of what I mean.

LOLOL whattttttt? So what brought about the Asian exception?

Where have I said I despise someone purely based on race, sexual orientation, or gender and based STRICTLY on that, and not their politics? Oh that's right, I never have.

Nor have I ever called anyone a race traitor. Hey, if politicians like Cruz, Rice, etc. etc. want to belong to a party that can't fight they way out of a paper bag anymore, that's their problem. I surely don't say they are selling out their race or others identities by being conservative.

So again, you're absolutely full of shit, and you're trying to box me and others into a corner that doesn't exist.

P.S. Just because SeanRenaud says one thing, does that mean all liberals think alike? So, I can start quoting BusyBody then and saying all conservatives hate blacks, right?

Make sure to come back with some other form of argument that I can quickly shoot down. Your idiocy is quite fun to tear apart.
 
I admit that was an assumption built on the fact that he can read. Corps men being pronounce Corpse men would support that he read the word. Like Colonel, corps is a word that either know how it's supposed to be said (and you're paying attention) or you don't (or you're not) and you pronounce it the way it looks like it should come out.

Its entirely possible however that he's a poor speller. The idea of a Harvard Professor who can't spell strikes me as about as unlikely as an oil tycoon who can't successfully rub elbows with people however. Certain skill sets tend to travel together.

I likewise don't know that Bush can BBQ, but I know which one of those two men I'm trusting with a steak.

He was never a professor. He was a guest lecturer so that Chicago Law School students could see what an actual "light-skinned black man with no negro dialect*" looked and sounded like. He gave a lecture verbatim of an actual professor using that professors notes. (Which is how he got good at teleprompter-sincerity.)

He was given that gig o merit to be sure...just like his time as President of the law review where he never wrote, nor edited.

*Harry Reid
 
The word "gay" in the original post was a miscue, so I have deleted it there and here. Even Liberals would have to admit their disdain for people such as Michelle Malkin, Ted Cruz, Clarence Thomas, Marco Rubio and many others whom they think should be part of their natural constituency.

Why would they think morons and charlatans should be part of their natural constituency?
 
Fascist Liberals have a special hatred in their hearts for women, gay, and black Conservatives. It's old news.
 
Fascist Liberals have a special hatred in their hearts for women, gay, and black Conservatives. It's old news.

Quoted for the hypocrisy.

Oh dear Miles, one of these days I really hope you can learn to use your brain.
 
Back
Top