Why do feminists and manginas NOT want me to post stuff like this?

[LJ_Reloaded]

Because it interrupts your nonstop propaganda that only men commit rape. It interferes with your campaign to erase the existence of women sex criminals.

Because short of the Hammer of God himself, I just won't fucking bow to your intimidation and bullshit.

The bombs of irrefutable facts just keep falling, in perpetuity, with bigger and bigger nuclear payloads. I will bomb your asses into submission. However long it takes, it is nonetheless as inevitable as the sunrise.

http://getoveryourselflady.tumblr.c...was-blackmailed-into-prostitution-by-roommate

Teen was ‘blackmailed into prostitution by roommate, 31, who drugged her, took compromising photos and threatened to make them public’

Canadian police have charged a woman with human trafficking for allegedly blackmailing her roommate into prostitution.

Amanda Kathleen McGee, 31, offered an 18-year-old newly arrived in Calgary from her home in British Columbia cheap rent in her apartment. It’s alleged McGee then began slipping drugs into alcoholic drinks the pair were consuming, waiting until the young woman was unconscious then taking sexually explicit photos of her. McGee then used the images to blackmail the 18-year-old into becoming a sex worker. According to CBC News, the 18-year-old arrived in Calgary in October 2013 for a job and met McGee while looking for a place to live.

Concerned about her welfare, in January the woman’s family asked local police to check on her. Police located the young woman at a bus station on January 11, attempting to return home. She told officers that she had been held against her will and forced into prostitution by Amanda McGee, her roommate. Police say McGee told the woman she would show the explicit photographs to her family and friends if she did not participate in sex acts for money.

McGee advertised the woman’s services on social media, and clients would meet her at the home she shared with McGee. The landlord of McGee, also her neighbor, said she didn’t notice anything untoward occurring at the home. “[I’m] totally surprised. We had no inkling at all that anything was going on over there,” Sharon Lawton told CBC News. Lawton said McGee told her that the 18-year-old was her young cousin.

 

[badbabysitter]

It's not the issues people have issues with you posting

it's the prefacing it with gender, gender politics and labeling

for instance..you want to bring attnetion to this crime of human trafficking..which rightfully should be spotlighted

but here's where you fucked up

you started off by blaming and insulting feminists and men that support them for allegedly not being offended... despite you not offering anyone to make a stance.. you've assigned them thier opinions and then criticized them for allegedly having the opinion you gave them

if you can find feminist organizations that oppose your posting these things and can show us where they did so, you would have some validity to your arguement


in addition, when you post articles about women commiting heinous actions..and insinuating feminism is to blame.. you invite others to give examples of the opposite

for example..on this board everyone wants to show how the other side is racist when it comes to politics.. and they both show genuine examples

if a republican is a racist, so can a democrat be.. and by showing both it is not " derailing " or " highjacking"..it is counterpoint

and that's exactly what you do when you post articles like this

if you really want to get people outraged.. stick to the issues.. not the gender politics

write about the crime.. not feminists and manginas, and blah blah blah.. write about the crime

 

[dan_c00000]

It's because you're boring and we really don't give a shit about what comes out of your mouth or fingers.

Does that answer your question?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

It's not the issues people have issues with you posting

it's the prefacing it with gender, gender politics and labeling

Ohhhhhhhhhhh I see
because feminists NEVER preface these issues with gender, gender politics and labeling...

Like "TEACH MEN NOT TO RAPE" isn't prefacing these issues with gender, gender politics and labeling? You don't seem to have a problem with that.

for instance..you want to bring attnetion to this crime of human trafficking..which rightfully should be spotlighted

but here's where you fucked up

you started off by blaming and insulting feminists and men that support them for allegedly not being offended... despite you not offering anyone to make a stance.. you've assigned them thier opinions and then criticized them for allegedly having the opinion you gave them

Ohhhhhh so the all too common feminist argument that this human trafficking thing is all Patriarchy and Misogyny and Evil Menz - you're just ERASING all of that now. Gotcha.

if you can find feminist organizations that oppose your posting these things and can show us where they did so, you would have some validity to your arguement

Oh, now let's see, posters saying "Don't be THAT girl" caused a feminist jihad to eliminate those posters from the face of all of Toronto

even though women also commit rape, the feminists wanted to keep the discussion centered around men who commit rape.

I fucking dare you to deny that.

America thinks women are harmless and that's why women's crimes are erased or, at worst for the women, punished with heavily discounted sentences.

And now you bitches want to eliminate prisons for women altogether!!!

 

[Queersetti]

If all you posted was kitty pictures and cookie recipes, most people still wouldn't like it.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

If all you posted was kitty pictures and cookie recipes, most people still wouldn't like it.

You guys wouldn't like anything I post. But that means shit to me. The people you treat as friends are the ones who should be scared the most. You fuckers are known for turning on each other.

 

[Queersetti]

You guys wouldn't like anything I post.

I just said that, nitwit.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I just said that, nitwit.

So what makes you think you will ever convince me to give a damn about what you retards say? You've been at me for God knows how long and you've achieved what? Absolutely nothing.

You just keep at it, you hear. You just keep telling yourself that one day I'll see the light and drink the purple kool-aid you people are addicted to.

And I'll just keep posting and laughing.

 

[Queersetti]

So what makes you think you will ever convince me to give a damn about what you retards say? You've been at me for God knows how long and you've achieved what? Absolutely nothing.

You just keep at it, you hear. You just keep telling yourself that one day I'll see the light and drink the purple kool-aid you people are addicted to.

And I'll just keep posting and laughing.

Like Renfield in Dracula.

 

[Liar]

badbabysitter is wrong.

It's not the prefacing it with gender, gender politics and labeling.

It's the prefacing it with ego and Internet one-upmanship at Bizarro levels. You don't make threads about issues. You make threads about you. The world "me" is even in the title.

When was the last time you started a thread on a topic without it being a pretext for opening with "You hate me for posting this, you feminazis and mangias!!!"?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

badbabysitter is wrong.

It's not the prefacing it with gender, gender politics and labeling.

It's the prefacing it with ego and Internet one-upmanship at Bizarro levels. You don't make threads about issues. You make threads about you. The world "me" is even in the title.

When was the last time you started a thread on a topic without it being a pretext for opening with "You hate me for posting this, you feminazis and mangias!!!"?

I only put such words in some posts, not most or all.

Of course on the other hand, you people are more than ready, in ALL threads, to make the issue about ME instead of the actual topic.

But you don't want to own up to that. In fact you chickenshits will pretend you never read this response.

 

[badbabysitter]

Ohhhhhhhhhhh I see
because feminists NEVER preface these issues with gender, gender politics and labeling...

Like "TEACH MEN NOT TO RAPE" isn't prefacing these issues with gender, gender politics and labeling? You don't seem to have a problem with that.

You're missimg what I'm saying

you posted an article about human trafficking..but prefaced it about the evils of feminists and rape...one thing has nothing to do with the other.. you just wanted to bring up gender politics for the sake of being confrontational

Ohhhhhh so the all too common feminist argument that this human trafficking thing is all Patriarchy and Misogyny and Evil Menz - you're just ERASING all of that now. Gotcha.

I never said that..please show me where i said that

I've even posted a thread about human trafficking in which a woman was he perpetrator

you posted something abut human trafficking.. but you wanted to slip the evils of feminism in as if they are directly related

Oh, now let's see, posters saying "Don't be THAT girl" caused a feminist jihad to eliminate those posters from the face of all of Toronto

Because the campaign was being effective at getting the message out about rape.. something apparently MRA can't stand for reasons beyond me

which still has nothing to do with why you prefaced human trafficking with feminism as if they were related

even though women also commit rape, the feminists wanted to keep the discussion centered around men who commit rape.

or perhaps because the majority of rapes commited have women as the victims.. just saying

no one's stoppping the mRA from launching their own campaign to stop male rape.. but they're not.. they're attacking another campaign..

I fucking dare you to deny that.

I'm not.. but I want to know how the hell feminism is related to human trafficking?

America thinks women are harmless and that's why women's crimes are erased or, at worst for the women, punished with heavily discounted sentences.

except for property crime.. or if you're in arizona and a woman you can be arrested for talking to someone on the street


none of which has anything to do with human trafficking and it's alleged connection to feminism you're implying

And now you bitches want to eliminate prisons for women altogether!!!

according to whom.. and how is this connected to human trafficking and it's alleged ties to feminism

your entire rant at me was a clear demonstration of what I was saying of not staying on an actual issue

 

[Boxlicker101]

Here's another recent example: http://murderpedia.org/female.H/h/huckaby-melissa.htm

 

[badbabysitter]

Here's another recent example: http://murderpedia.org/female.H/h/huckaby-melissa.htm

also which has nothing to do with the alleged connection between feminism and human trafficking



PS,, she was convicted, and is serving a life sentence without parole...

 

[Boxlicker101]

also which has nothing to do with the alleged connection between feminism and human trafficking



PS,, she was convicted, and is serving a life sentence without parole...

I am just agreeing with the premise of this thread. This was a particularly heinous sex crime committed by a member of "the gentler sex."

 

[Liar]

I only put such words in some posts, not most or all.

Of course on the other hand, you people are more than ready, in ALL threads, to make the issue about ME instead of the actual topic.

But you don't want to own up to that. In fact you chickenshits will pretend you never read this response.

Not sure who you're bunching me up with. I'm sure I can snark with the best of them, but you'll find I stay on topic... most of the time. Nobody´s perfect, I'm just damn close.

Here the topic is you vs other posters. Your choice.

 

[Queersetti]

I only put such words in some posts, not most or all.

Of course on the other hand, you people are more than ready, in ALL threads, to make the issue about ME instead of the actual topic.

But you don't want to own up to that. In fact you chickenshits will pretend you never read this response.

Why should anyone do otherwise? If we agree with you, you attack us over some other point on which we once disagreed.

 

[unregistered]

 

[john415]

And I'll just keep posting and laughing.

You are a human equivalent of a colostomy shitbag

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You are a human equivalent of a colostomy shitbag

And you are a dickless mangina pussy.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You're missimg what I'm saying

I don't care what you're saying.

MY reason for posting this is that feminists ROUTINELY preface these issues with gender, gender politics and labeling - just like you accuse me of doing.

Yet you have no problem when they do it.

Feminists use human trafficking and rape as political football. They go out of their way to silence discussions about male victims.

You even sat silent right here on this forum while people said male children ought to be happy about being raped by an adult woman. Care to explain that?

You don't care about rape - you use it as a political football.

So now I'm throwing the ball back at you.

 

[badbabysitter]

I don't care what you're saying.

then why are you posting if you don't want dialogue?

MY reason for posting this is that feminists ROUTINELY preface these issues with gender, gender politics and labeling - just like you accuse me of doing.

show me where on this board this happens..outside of you

Yet you have no problem when they do it.

Because I don't see these alleged feminists doing it on this board... just you

Feminists use human trafficking and rape as political football. They go out of their way to silence discussions about male victims.

How? I just literally told you about a case I've been following in which a woman was the perpetrator?

and how exactly have feminists been silencing discussion about male rape? by subverting a widley advertised campaign?

You even sat silent right here on this forum while people said male children ought to be happy about being raped by an adult woman. Care to explain that?

you might notice I don't post every goddamn ed day..I'm lucky if if I can get on this site 3 days in aweek..if something isnt on the first page I generally don't reply...and by saying that you've opened the door to injustices commited to women that you have sat silent about?

see how intellectually dishonest that was of me? yet, you seem to be fine with doing it to others

You don't care about rape - you use it as a political football.

show me once where I don't care.... you're giving me an opinion and then criticizing me for having the opinion you gave me

So now I'm throwing the ball back at you.

and if I kick it instead of catch it, you'll accuse me of hating football

 

[john415]

And you are a dickless mangina pussy.

Woah good one.

You do realize your a turd smeared hemorrhoid bleeding all over the place.

 

[haurni]

Why do feminists and manginas NOT want me to post stuff like this?

It's because you deliberately choose to misinterpret anti-violence against women campaigns as somehow 'proving' that people (specifically women) don't care about male rape, and from that you seem to conclude that there's some sort of vast and nebulous feminist conspiracy dedicated to denying the very existence of male rape. As a result, you feel that makes it okay to express your moral outrage by being insulting, offensive and hateful to people in general and women in particular.

I have some constructive suggestions for you:

1. Get your head out of your ass and realize that other people have other priorities than yours. When half of the female population is subject to some form of sexual assault or harassment during the course of their lives, an incidence which far outstrips the percentage of men who are harassed or assaulted, it makes sense that women are more concerned for their own safety than they are about the group who commit the vast majority of the assaults against them. Now see #2 below.

2. If you want someone to educate people about male rape, why don't you do it? Women educate people about female rape, it seems only fair that men should be the ones to educate people about male rape (I'm assuming you're male - I don't care enough to search your posts to find out more. For the reason why, see #3 below). As for how to do this - not the way you're doing it. You present individual cases, but this only serves to illustrate that male rape exists, which many people already know. Bitching about a case where some woman gets a light sentence for raping a boy says nothing constructive about the entire issue - this happens to women all the time. How about some in-depth and detailed studies of incidence, police responses, sentencing, and societal factors that contribute to the 'legitimization' of male rape (e.g. 'boys are lucky if an older woman has sex with them')? Present group data, not single instances.

3. Don't be fucking insulting. It's not the topic that turns people off, it's the way you present it. People are more likely to pay serious attention to you if you present reasoned arguments and valid statistics rather than simply trolling to prove how obnoxious and offensive you can be. You also do a vast amount of overgeneralization, deliberate misinterpretation and ad hominem attacks (along the lines of "You didn't comment on the case I mentioned, so you must be a douchebag who condones male rape"), which is painfully unpleasant to read because it communicates nothing other than that you're only interested in arguing. Whatever your issues are, don't take them out on other people. If one person did something to you, for example, reserve your ire for that person and don't assume that all people are like that.

Have a nice day.