I don't believe in rules when it comes to people. There shouldn't be imaginary standards we hold people too. Social norms and mores are rather dumb. Somewhat useful in some circumstances, but they break down when it counts. So they're dumb.
All I got out of that was Physics, Chemistry, Biology, and all that to you. And chemicals and sexy DNA.
I didn't say it was a bad field to work in. I only said it doesn't interest me terribly much.
Blabbity blah blah.
I didn't say it was a bad field to work in. I only said it doesn't interest me terribly much.
Blabbity blah blah.
You've got sexy DNA
Anways, I wish we didn't have a lot of social norms and constructs as well (i.e. men can never cry, women must be chaste) but I think understanding them and why we create them will help us to break away from certain norms and mores and START A REVOLUTION!
But hard sciences are the academic equivalent of chores to me. Glad I'm done with that.
There are lots of unspoken rules about interacting people, and about people's behaviour, I think. There are thoughts that are built into us, wired into us during our upbringing. Thoughts that affect our interpretation of the world around us, that colour our thoughts. Rules that we put in place, whether we mean to or not. And I think that sociology is the act attempting to name those rules, and that psychology is the act of trying to understand those rules.
Pfft.
Not a revolution. A devolution. We break away from some norms and we'll likely jump down a few thousand years. I mean, really... what are those norms for? Comfort of the human animal, wool packing for his fragile mind, to keep the wrenches out of our finely-tuned social environment. If we open up the hood and give someone a monkey wrench to toss in there, some bad shit is going to happen. I think it's that simple. So a devolution.
Social sciences are chores for me...
There are lots of unspoken rules about interacting people, and about people's behaviour, I think. There are thoughts that are built into us, wired into us during our upbringing. Thoughts that affect our interpretation of the world around us, that colour our thoughts. Rules that we put in place, whether we mean to or not. And I think that sociology is the act attempting to name those rules, and that psychology is the act of trying to understand those rules.
Pfft.
Not a revolution. A devolution. We break away from some norms and we'll likely jump down a few thousand years. I mean, really... what are those norms for? Comfort of the human animal, wool packing for his fragile mind, to keep the wrenches out of our finely-tuned social environment. If we open up the hood and give someone a monkey wrench to toss in there, some bad shit is going to happen. I think it's that simple. So a devolution.
Social sciences are chores for me...
Hell. I'm willing to explain that one here on the thread. My apologies, other Litfolk. Not really, though.You know what I'd be interested in studying? Why every time I compliment you or try to be flirty you brush me off.
I am having issues on Lit with posting.
I have written to you elsewhere.
Alright.
Fiiiine. And they say women can't accept compliments.
You remind me of this Marine I met that should have been a model. Couldn't/wouldn't take compliments.
Oh, trust me, as someone studying the social sciences Literotica and Litsters are incredibly fascinating to me.
I'm sure they are. I just find those 'fascinating' bits mildly annoying. You should use us as a term project or some such.
I only accept compliments in certain situations. But like, say, I just saved the world and fought off an alien horde with only half of the jawbone of an ass, I wouldn't take compliments.
