the "ask crazychemgirl a question" thread

In your opinion, is high fructose corn syrup any worse for you than refined sugar?

I personally don't think so, but that's my personal opinion.. everything in moderation.

Left testicle hanging way down.
Then, during my last major back surgery, they did something to my balls.
I was in the hospital a week due to them giving me a heart attack and other stuff. My balls were so HUGE that every time I rolled over in the bed, I had to use both hands to roll them over to the other side. They were about ten lbs and way more than two handfulls.

More than two years later, together, they are still about twice the size they were before the surgery, and they are pretty much equal in size now. No more hanging left.

So, have a bad surgery, but I don't recommend it!:eek:

wow.. that's fucked up.


whatever.

Why isn't there a picture with this post? (I do much better with visuals.)

I post plenty of pictures.
 

There's a certain compound that exists in a gaseous state in our atmosphere at STP. It currently makes up 0.000395 of the atmosphere. It is opaque to radiant energy at certain well-known wavelengths. It has been theorized that this compound is largely responsible for an increase in earth's atmospheric temperatures over the last one hundred sixty-odd years.


Do you believe that theory is accurate?


 
Last edited:

There's a certain compound that exists in a gaseous state in our atmosphere at STP. It currently makes up 0.000395 of the atmosphere. It is opaque to radiant energy at certain well-known wavelengths. It has been theorized that this compound is largely responsible for an increase in earth's atmospheric temperatures over the last one hundred sixty-odd years.


Do you believe that theory is accurate?




there are a ton of trace gases in our atmosphere .. basically all of the noble gases (Neon, Argon, Krypton, Xenon) .. I don't believe the 2nd part though.
 
there are a ton of trace gases in our atmosphere .. basically all of the noble gases (Neon, Argon, Krypton, Xenon) .. I don't believe the 2nd part though.

Interesting......of course, TS isn't typing about a noble gas, it's just plain old carbon dioxide.
 
Interesting......of course, TS isn't typing about a noble gas, it's just plain old carbon dioxide.

that was what made the most sense as far as percentage in the atmosphere.... but I'm also still not 100% convinced about carbon dioxide being the sole contributor to global warming.. because methane and other such gases are also factors.
 
that was what made the most sense as far as percentage in the atmosphere.... but I'm also still not 100% convinced about carbon dioxide being the sole contributor to global warming.. because methane and other such gases are also factors.

It's not as simple as it's made out to be, that's for damn sure.
 

There's a certain compound that exists in a gaseous state in our atmosphere at STP. It currently makes up 0.000395 of the atmosphere. It is opaque to radiant energy at certain well-known wavelengths. It has been theorized that this compound is largely responsible for an increase in earth's atmospheric temperatures over the last one hundred sixty-odd years.


Do you believe that theory is accurate?




0.000395 (395 parts per million) doesn't sound like much, but 270 parts per million of cyanide in the atmosphere will kill you. And the carbon dioxide level was only about 315 parts per million when I was born. That's a big jump -- a 25% increase -- in not much time.

I believe this is the measurement at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii -- 10,000 feet up a mountain in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.
 
Last edited:
It's not as simple as it's made out to be, that's for damn sure.

agreed

0.000395 (395 parts per million) doesn't sound like much, but it was only about 315 parts per million when I was born. That's a big jump -- a 25% increase -- in not much time.

I believe this is the measurement at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii -- 10,000 feet up a mountain in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.

measurements are measurements.... still need more info to say it's ALL because of that
 
I personally don't think so, but that's my personal opinion.. everything in moderation.

...

wow.. that's fucked up.
It bothered me for a while back then but now it's no problem.
I kinda like 'em the new way. It was more like getting a facelift.

Thanks for all that talk about basic colors. I always knew the RGB scale from working in electronics, but never understood why crayons had a different group. I looked it on Wikipedia and they have a good explanation of the whole thing. They call it Additive or Subtractive and go into details.
Interesting: They say some women might have 4 color receptors rather than the 3 that most of us have. I wouldn't be surprised.
 
It bothered me for a while back then but now it's no problem.
I kinda like 'em the new way. It was more like getting a facelift.

Thanks for all that talk about basic colors. I always knew the RGB scale from working in electronics, but never understood why crayons had a different group. I looked it on Wikipedia and they have a good explanation of the whole thing. They call it Additive or Subtractive and go into details.
Interesting: They say some women might have 4 color receptors rather than the 3 that most of us have. I wouldn't be surprised.


no problem... it's the point of this thread. Come again soon!
 
Is there something scientific I can say to him to convince him that eating his cum out of my pussy is oh, so hot?

here are ten..


1. Natural anti-depressant.
2. Natural anxiety reducer.
3. Improves quality of sleep.
4. Increases energy.
5. Improves concentration.
6. Improves memory.
7. Improves mental alertness.
8. Assists with pregnancy maintenance.
9. Increases female-initiated sexual behavior.
10. Reduces pain.
 
Back
Top