cjh
orgone accumulator
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Posts
- 32,630
Ahhh, you are European. But that explains everything.
that we pay the most for less-than-the best health care?
that's what you shoot for?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ahhh, you are European. But that explains everything.
precedes nixon.
it goes back to wage controls and WW II.
it's a fucked-up set of circumstance though, in an economy where people no longer remain with one employer for a career.
Better then what...and half the price of what? And how would you know this?
I feel silly now, I am debating with someone who does not live here, thinks we should be more like him and live in his utopia while telling me I should go live somewhere else.
Your healthcare is third world. Really. Any European that's ever lived in the US comes back with a contemptuous attitude to your health care system.
precedes nixon.
it goes back to wage controls and WW II.
it's a fucked-up set of circumstance though, in an economy where people no longer remain with one employer for a career.
Better then what...and half the price of what? And how would you know this?
I feel silly now, I am debating with someone who does not live here, thinks we should be more like him and live in his utopia while telling me I should go live somewhere else.
Every healthcare metric ever. There are figures that measure this stuff. The US pays more than double per capita for worse care than every other country in the civilised world. Google it.
Does anyone else see the elephant?I doubt very much that the level of coverage you have is anywhere close to what I have that up until recently was paid for 100% by my employer. I live within an hour of some of the best know medical facilities in this country and arguably the world.
If my child, God forbid, was diagnosed with cancer or some other life threatening condition I would much prefer to live where I do with the health care system I have then your mediocre, good enough for the masses socialized medicine that you defend.
I chose to live here, I chose to take a job that didn't pay the salary I could get elsewhere because of the benefit of a comprehensive family health plan. That was my choice. Obamacare threatens what I have chosen for me and my family and millions of others like me.
I doubt very much that the level of coverage you have is anywhere close to what I have that up until recently was paid for 100% by my employer. I live within an hour of some of the best know medical facilities in this country and arguably the world.
If my child, God forbid, was diagnosed with cancer or some other life threatening condition I would much prefer to live where I do with the health care system I have then your mediocre, good enough for the masses socialized medicine that you defend.
I chose to live here, I chose to take a job that didn't pay the salary I could get elsewhere because of the benefit of a comprehensive family health plan. That was my choice. Obamacare threatens what I have chosen for me and my family and millions of others like me.
Millions of others like you? Almost nobody has an insurance plan 100% paid for by their employer. I can't name a single employer that does that or close to it.
Are you incredibly sick?
Millions of others like you? Almost nobody has an insurance plan 100% paid for by their employer. I can't name a single employer that does that or close to it.
Are you incredibly sick?
England may offer wider access to some healthcare for some people, but to argue that the care itself is superior is ridiculous. All you need to watch is where the Arab sheiks go to get fixed. It ain't old Blighty.
England may offer wider access to some healthcare for some people, but to argue that the care itself is superior is ridiculous. All you need to watch is where the Arab sheiks go to get fixed. It ain't old Blighty.
If you fall seriously ill in the Middle East or Africa, your safest bet is probably to get medically evacuated to Europe. There, the standard-bearers at the top of the list, London, Paris and Zurich, are getting competition from quality private clinics in Austria. Among them are Privatklinik Döbling, Wiener Privatklinik, Goldenes Kreuz Privatklinik and the Rudolfinerhaus.
that we pay the most for less-than-the best health care?
that's what you shoot for?
My point, better said.
This. Totally this. We are, literally, the only country in the world with an advanced economy where people live in fear of the day they might require medical assistance. Why?
In the handful of other advanced countries that DON'T have a public, non-profit system, they actually regulate the private providers like any other business. (Even post-ACA, the private providers in our system are essentially exempt from most regulations we impose on for-profit ventures--this is why backdoor bailouts are designed into the bill, even the lobbyists know the status quo is unsustainable.)
Then, in the vast majority of other advanced nations, they actually do have a public, non-profit universal health care system (in moderate countries, this is single-payer, in more liberal countries, this is a national health service.) Which boasts much better health care outcome because good public health outcomes--not intensity of billable care--is what is rewarded in such a system. (Unfortunately, thanks largely to the OFA propaganda machine, there are O-bot cultists who attend the messaging of the White House exclusively and believe the ACA is a single-payer bill--largely because this is how the benefits of the bill are framed in the rhetoric even though the ACA does very little to change the structure of the current system beyond pumping cash into a doomed system via the mandate and backdoor bailouts and canceling rescission---the latter only really if certain conditions continue to be met.)
The more educated/not-as-blinded-by-Yellow-Dog-partisanship members of the "Left" in America understand the bill is shitty and the far right opposes the bill for the wrong reasons. Also, very few people overall have a good understanding of the law--including President Obama, if you believe the rationales he's offered for the horrible rollout--because of the needless complexity of the law, which is by design--if you're confused by something, you can't effectively oppose it. (See: Also Trans-Pacific Partnership "trade deal.)
The bottom line on the law is that--because it doesn't touch the anti-trust law exemptions of the industry, doesn't address the corrupting influence of incentives in the health care industry outside of that, is flawed in both design and execution, etc--it's going to have a very similar legacy to RomneyCare in MA, i.e. it's only going to really improve how the system performs for the provider side and the upper middle class, wealthy, and their kids on the consumer side and the rest of us are going to be stuck with a system that's largely unchanged--RomneyCare failed to rein in costs, reduce the rate of ER visits, or otherwise improve overall healthoutcomes. That is, except for the poor. The working poor will effectively see an increased tax burden and be in a program both parties--namely Obama and Paul Ryan--have been trying to destroy for five years: Medicare/Medicaid.
It's foolish to argue that there aren't some fine institutions in Europe, but the operative word(?) is 'privatclinik.'
Extraordinarily high quality clinics are being set up in Costa Rica in anticipation of there being high quality, affordable, health care market for the America's. The target being upper middle class US and Canadian citizens.
Ishmael
There will always be John Hopkins and Mayo and M.D. Anderson.
I know this much, though, I sure as hell don't want to be treated at the county hospital next county over.
Medicine is being outsourced, like everything else. Comparable quality, lower cost of labor.