18 Crazy Right-Wing Myths About Obama, Debunked

KingOrfeo

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 27, 2008
Posts
39,182
18 Crazy Right-Wing Myths About Obama, Debunked

Author: Bruce Lindner January 13, 2014 1:37 pm

1) Obama takes too many vacations.
FACT:
As of August 16th of 2013, Obama had taken 92 days of vacation vs 367 for George W. Bush.

2) Obama has divided the nation.
FACT:
Obama has done more to unite this nation than any president since Lincoln. But he’s up against a phalanx of 21st Century separatists, racists and neo-fascists, some of whom have openly proposed seceding. Here… let me hold that door for you. Besides; who’s dividing the Republican party into right wing and ultra-far right wings? Is Obama doing that too? Nope. Look in a mirror Teabigots.

3) Obama’s policies are bankrupting America.
FACT:
Reagan added $1.9 trillion to the debt. Bush Sr. added an additional $1.5. Clinton added $1.4. Dubbya added $6.1. Obama has added less than $3.0, the bulk of which was to offset the effects of the Bush recession. Who holds that debt? China; $1.2 trillion. Japan; $900 billion. The Fed; $1.6 trillion. The public; $3.6 trillion. Government trusts; $1.9 trillion. Social Security; $2.7 trillion. So nice try, but no Kewpie doll for you

4) Obama’s a socialist.
FACT:
Hardly. Obama’s economic and social policies are to the right of Kennedy’s, Eisenhower’s, Nixon’s, and even some of Reagan’s. If Obama’s a socialist, then Eisenhower, who had a 91% top tax rate, was a Republican Marxist.

5) Obama lied about keeping your present healthcare insurance.
FACT:
Lying and being wrong are two different things. Obama turned out to be wrong, but he didn’t lie. He appeared before the cameras 28 times, repeating the exact same words — “If you like your present policy, you can keep it,” knowing full well he was being recorded each time. If you believe any president would deliberately set himself up like that, then Fox News is indeed the place for you.

6) Obama’s weak on foreign policy.
FACT:
Osama bin Laden, the man who murdered 3,000+ Americans on 9/11 is dead. Muammar Khaddafi, the man who blew 300+ Americans out of the sky is dead. More al Qaeda terrorists were taken out under just Obama’s first three years than during the entire 8 years of Bush’s “War on Terrorism,” where we somehow managed to wind up in Iraq; a country that offered asylum to zero terrorists. ‘Nuff said.

7) Obama has taken sides with the Arabs against Israel.
FACT:
“I think that from my point of view as defense minister they (American/Israeli relations) are extremely good, extremely deep and profound. I can see long years, um, administrations of both sides of political aisle deeply supporting the state of Israel and I believe that reflects a profound feeling among the American people. But I should tell you honestly that this administration under President Obama is doing in regard to our security more than anything that I can remember in the past. In terms of the support for our security, the cooperation of our intelligence, the sharing of sorts in a very open way even when there are differences which are not simple sometimes, I’ve found their support for our defense very stable.” ~ Ehud Barak, former Prime Minister of Israel

But what would he know?

8) America is less safe under Obama than ever before.
FACT:
3,000 Americans killed by al Qaeda on 9/11, when George W. Bush was president. Zero successful al Qaeda attacks on America under Obama. Do the math.

9) Benghazi is Obama’s 9/11.
FACT:
There were 13 attacks on American embassies during the Bush years, resulting in some 100 deaths. But Fox News and their reich-wing cohorts has never mentioned them. Benghazi is something that happened to us, not something the administration did. I’m sorry you haven’t gotten the memo, but Benghazi is just another Fox non-story. Same with the IRS “scandal.”

10) ObamaCare is Obama’s 9/11.
See #9.

11) Sandy Hook was Obama’s 9/11.
See a shrink.

12) Solyndra!
FACT:
Solyndra was a $500 million loan that didn’t pay off. How much is $500 million? That’s how much the Bush administration spent every 18 hours on the Iraq War for five years – an expense no Republican ever complains about. And what was our reward? 4,500 Americans killed, at least 100,000 Iraqis killed, another 2 million Iraqis driven from their homes, the emergence of the Shia awakening, and our reputation in a shambles. Thanks Republicans. And you’re upset about half a billion spent on Solyndra.

13) Iraq is falling to al Qaeda due to Obama’s policies.
FACT:
Had we not invaded Iraq in the first place, a war Obama opposed 12 years ago, we wouldn’t be seeing Falluja falling to al Qaeda. And who was it that wrote the timetable for our Iraq exit two years ago? Oh, yeah; the Bush administration. You might just as well blame Obama for Bush’s recession. Oh, wait — you do that too!

14) Obama’s policies are anti-business.
FACT:
The Dow Jones when Clinton entered office in January 1993 was at 3,300. When he left office in January 2001: 10,662. Dow Jones when Bush left office in January 2009: 9,034. Dow Jones today: 16,437. The Dow has more than doubled in just the first five years of the Obama administration. Yes…. Businessmen just hate that.

15) Obama’s policies have resulted in massive unemployment.
FACT:
When George W. Bush stumbled into office in January 2001, he inherited a 4.3% unemployment rate from Bill Clinton. When he left office 8 years later, the unemployment rate was 9.7% and rising fast. As of today, that number is 6.7%, no thanks to the Republicans in Congress who’ve done everything within their power to sabotage the recovery.

During the eight years under George W. Bush, his policies created just 1 million jobs (with another 2 million in the military). Since Barack Obama was sworn in five years ago, 7.6 million jobs have been created, and there are still three years left in his term. So, nice try.

16) Fast & Furious.
FACT:
Another poorly conceived program left over from the Bush administration that the GOP is trying to pin on Obama. Move along.

17) Liberals always try to deflect from Obama’s record by bringing up Bush.
FACT:
Wrong-o, Bozo. We just like to rub your noses in your hypocrisy. By intentionally ignoring, or even lying about Bush’s record and focusing instead on the above Fox News lies, you’ve liberated yourselves once again from those pesky facts. So it’s become incumbent upon us to set the record straight. To the contrary, conservatives are always trying to deflect from the failures of the Bush years by telling the aforementioned lies.

18) The deficit has skyrocketed under Obama.
FACT:
The budget was balanced when Clinton left office in 2001 (in fact, he left Dubbya with a $300,000,000,000 surplus).

Eight years later, Bush left Obama with a $1,413,000,000,000 deficit and a 9.8% deficit/GDP ratio. Most of which was due to Bush’s deficit-spending on the Iraq War, Medicare Part D and the two tax cuts that largely went to the wealthy.

“Remember what Reagan taught us. Deficits don’t matter.” ~ Dick Cheney.

Since Obama’s election:
◾2010 — $1,294,000,000,000 8.7% deficit/GDP
◾2011 — $1,300,000,000,000 8.4% deficit/GDP
◾2012 — $1,087,000,000,000 6.8% deficit/GDP
◾2013 — $680,000,000,000 4.1% deficit/GDP
◾2014 — $560,000,000,000 3.3% deficit/GDP

See a pattern developing? Furthermore, the United States is now producing more oil than we import. Our overall trade deficit is at a four year low, as imported oil continues to decline. GM, Ford and Chrysler are all chugging along nicely, no thanks to a unified Republican/Teabigot party, who were eager to sacrifice 2 million American jobs on their altar of Obama Derangement Syndrome.

The trade gap has fallen 12.9% to $34.3 billion as Obama’s policies have made American products and services more available abroad, while Americans are increasingly buying more domestic products. The trade imbalance is now lower than at any time since the beginning of the recession, and the offshoring of American jobs has (finally) slowed to a trickle.

Our trade gap with China is down 6.7% (largely based on their taste for American cars — see above), our trade gap with Japan is down 8.4% and our trade gap with the European Union has dropped a whopping 29.4%.

Are things perfect? No. There’s still much to be done. But the rumors of Barack Obama’s “failures” have been greatly exaggerated, and it’s time to call these talking points what they are… lies. This president will go down in history as a man who achieved some amazing accomplishments, especially considering the unified opposition he’s had to endure since Day One.

So there you have it Fox News “patriots,” all your talking points shot to hell in one FACT-based document. How do you like them apples, bitches?
 
A small quibble about #18. Clinton had a balanced "budget" but he never balanced spending. The last time the debt went down was in the early 50s.

Budgeted spending and actual spending are horses of a different color.
 
People care about #1, they don't care about porpoises or spotted owls or Mexicans or Niggaz or faggots, and they sure as shit don't wanna pay more taxes for liberals to piss away on the above^^^^^^^. Folks know theyre being hosed by Obama, and the bill comes due in November.
 
18 Crazy Right-Wing Myths About Obama, Debunked

Author: Bruce Lindner January 13, 2014 1:37 pm

1) Obama takes too many vacations.
FACT:
As of August 16th of 2013, Obama had taken 92 days of vacation vs 367 for George W. Bush.

2) Obama has divided the nation.
FACT:
Obama has done more to unite this nation than any president since Lincoln. But he’s up against a phalanx of 21st Century separatists, racists and neo-fascists, some of whom have openly proposed seceding. Here… let me hold that door for you. Besides; who’s dividing the Republican party into right wing and ultra-far right wings? Is Obama doing that too? Nope. Look in a mirror Teabigots.

3) Obama’s policies are bankrupting America.
FACT:
Reagan added $1.9 trillion to the debt. Bush Sr. added an additional $1.5. Clinton added $1.4. Dubbya added $6.1. Obama has added less than $3.0, the bulk of which was to offset the effects of the Bush recession. Who holds that debt? China; $1.2 trillion. Japan; $900 billion. The Fed; $1.6 trillion. The public; $3.6 trillion. Government trusts; $1.9 trillion. Social Security; $2.7 trillion. So nice try, but no Kewpie doll for you

4) Obama’s a socialist.
FACT:
Hardly. Obama’s economic and social policies are to the right of Kennedy’s, Eisenhower’s, Nixon’s, and even some of Reagan’s. If Obama’s a socialist, then Eisenhower, who had a 91% top tax rate, was a Republican Marxist.

5) Obama lied about keeping your present healthcare insurance.
FACT:
Lying and being wrong are two different things. Obama turned out to be wrong, but he didn’t lie. He appeared before the cameras 28 times, repeating the exact same words — “If you like your present policy, you can keep it,” knowing full well he was being recorded each time. If you believe any president would deliberately set himself up like that, then Fox News is indeed the place for you.

6) Obama’s weak on foreign policy.
FACT:
Osama bin Laden, the man who murdered 3,000+ Americans on 9/11 is dead. Muammar Khaddafi, the man who blew 300+ Americans out of the sky is dead. More al Qaeda terrorists were taken out under just Obama’s first three years than during the entire 8 years of Bush’s “War on Terrorism,” where we somehow managed to wind up in Iraq; a country that offered asylum to zero terrorists. ‘Nuff said.

7) Obama has taken sides with the Arabs against Israel.
FACT:
“I think that from my point of view as defense minister they (American/Israeli relations) are extremely good, extremely deep and profound. I can see long years, um, administrations of both sides of political aisle deeply supporting the state of Israel and I believe that reflects a profound feeling among the American people. But I should tell you honestly that this administration under President Obama is doing in regard to our security more than anything that I can remember in the past. In terms of the support for our security, the cooperation of our intelligence, the sharing of sorts in a very open way even when there are differences which are not simple sometimes, I’ve found their support for our defense very stable.” ~ Ehud Barak, former Prime Minister of Israel

But what would he know?

8) America is less safe under Obama than ever before.
FACT:
3,000 Americans killed by al Qaeda on 9/11, when George W. Bush was president. Zero successful al Qaeda attacks on America under Obama. Do the math.

9) Benghazi is Obama’s 9/11.
FACT:
There were 13 attacks on American embassies during the Bush years, resulting in some 100 deaths. But Fox News and their reich-wing cohorts has never mentioned them. Benghazi is something that happened to us, not something the administration did. I’m sorry you haven’t gotten the memo, but Benghazi is just another Fox non-story. Same with the IRS “scandal.”

10) ObamaCare is Obama’s 9/11.
See #9.

11) Sandy Hook was Obama’s 9/11.
See a shrink.

12) Solyndra!
FACT:
Solyndra was a $500 million loan that didn’t pay off. How much is $500 million? That’s how much the Bush administration spent every 18 hours on the Iraq War for five years – an expense no Republican ever complains about. And what was our reward? 4,500 Americans killed, at least 100,000 Iraqis killed, another 2 million Iraqis driven from their homes, the emergence of the Shia awakening, and our reputation in a shambles. Thanks Republicans. And you’re upset about half a billion spent on Solyndra.

13) Iraq is falling to al Qaeda due to Obama’s policies.
FACT:
Had we not invaded Iraq in the first place, a war Obama opposed 12 years ago, we wouldn’t be seeing Falluja falling to al Qaeda. And who was it that wrote the timetable for our Iraq exit two years ago? Oh, yeah; the Bush administration. You might just as well blame Obama for Bush’s recession. Oh, wait — you do that too!

14) Obama’s policies are anti-business.
FACT:
The Dow Jones when Clinton entered office in January 1993 was at 3,300. When he left office in January 2001: 10,662. Dow Jones when Bush left office in January 2009: 9,034. Dow Jones today: 16,437. The Dow has more than doubled in just the first five years of the Obama administration. Yes…. Businessmen just hate that.

15) Obama’s policies have resulted in massive unemployment.
FACT:
When George W. Bush stumbled into office in January 2001, he inherited a 4.3% unemployment rate from Bill Clinton. When he left office 8 years later, the unemployment rate was 9.7% and rising fast. As of today, that number is 6.7%, no thanks to the Republicans in Congress who’ve done everything within their power to sabotage the recovery.

During the eight years under George W. Bush, his policies created just 1 million jobs (with another 2 million in the military). Since Barack Obama was sworn in five years ago, 7.6 million jobs have been created, and there are still three years left in his term. So, nice try.

16) Fast & Furious.
FACT:
Another poorly conceived program left over from the Bush administration that the GOP is trying to pin on Obama. Move along.

17) Liberals always try to deflect from Obama’s record by bringing up Bush.
FACT:
Wrong-o, Bozo. We just like to rub your noses in your hypocrisy. By intentionally ignoring, or even lying about Bush’s record and focusing instead on the above Fox News lies, you’ve liberated yourselves once again from those pesky facts. So it’s become incumbent upon us to set the record straight. To the contrary, conservatives are always trying to deflect from the failures of the Bush years by telling the aforementioned lies.

18) The deficit has skyrocketed under Obama.
FACT:
The budget was balanced when Clinton left office in 2001 (in fact, he left Dubbya with a $300,000,000,000 surplus).

Eight years later, Bush left Obama with a $1,413,000,000,000 deficit and a 9.8% deficit/GDP ratio. Most of which was due to Bush’s deficit-spending on the Iraq War, Medicare Part D and the two tax cuts that largely went to the wealthy.

“Remember what Reagan taught us. Deficits don’t matter.” ~ Dick Cheney.

Since Obama’s election:
◾2010 — $1,294,000,000,000 8.7% deficit/GDP
◾2011 — $1,300,000,000,000 8.4% deficit/GDP
◾2012 — $1,087,000,000,000 6.8% deficit/GDP
◾2013 — $680,000,000,000 4.1% deficit/GDP
◾2014 — $560,000,000,000 3.3% deficit/GDP

See a pattern developing? Furthermore, the United States is now producing more oil than we import. Our overall trade deficit is at a four year low, as imported oil continues to decline. GM, Ford and Chrysler are all chugging along nicely, no thanks to a unified Republican/Teabigot party, who were eager to sacrifice 2 million American jobs on their altar of Obama Derangement Syndrome.

The trade gap has fallen 12.9% to $34.3 billion as Obama’s policies have made American products and services more available abroad, while Americans are increasingly buying more domestic products. The trade imbalance is now lower than at any time since the beginning of the recession, and the offshoring of American jobs has (finally) slowed to a trickle.

Our trade gap with China is down 6.7% (largely based on their taste for American cars — see above), our trade gap with Japan is down 8.4% and our trade gap with the European Union has dropped a whopping 29.4%.

Are things perfect? No. There’s still much to be done. But the rumors of Barack Obama’s “failures” have been greatly exaggerated, and it’s time to call these talking points what they are… lies. This president will go down in history as a man who achieved some amazing accomplishments, especially considering the unified opposition he’s had to endure since Day One.

So there you have it Fox News “patriots,” all your talking points shot to hell in one FACT-based document. How do you like them apples, bitches?

http://forgifs.com/gallery/d/184038-1/Obama_kicks_door.gif

http://31.media.tumblr.com/8cb046e6f16e05f8521e15de31927f52/tumblr_mt80mvKYGn1rqfhi2o1_500.gif

http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mcx1361rRa1qkomroo1_500.gif

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/obamagangnam.gif
 
A small quibble about #18. Clinton had a balanced "budget" but he never balanced spending. The last time the debt went down was in the early 50s.

Budgeted spending and actual spending are horses of a different color.

Bless you for your honesty, but that is not a "quibble." It is the very heart of the lie that Clinton Democrats never tire of telling.
 
A small quibble about #18. Clinton had a balanced "budget" but he never balanced spending. The last time the debt went down was in the early 50s.

Budgeted spending and actual spending are horses of a different color.

I was about to correct you but double checked my facts, the debt relative to the GDP was falling consistently until Reagan took over not the actual debt itself. Still that's a fairly important distinction one thinks.

I have a quibble with five, mostly in that this is one of those cases where the difference between being ignorant as to how your plan would work out or lying REALLY doesn't make much of a difference and I have a hard time believing that he didn't lie anyway.
 
Fact-checking ole Johnny, looking for a gotcha will only lead to disappointment.:cool:
 
Holly fuck you are a really, a special kind of stupid.

Its like you walked into a cancer hospital and talked with every patient in the hospital...then you walked out with a theory that everyone has cancer.

when talking about vacations, how the fuck does Bush enter the picture?

Jesus your kind is so fucking stupid, its no wonder you live off welfare as your too fucking stupid to get a job. Crawl back into your septic tank you stupid jackass..... you give ignorant people a bad name
 
Fact-checking ole Johnny, looking for a gotcha will only lead to disappointment.:cool:

Actually I was fact checking myself before I made the mistake of calling Johnny out. Johnny is on the short list along side Hogan, Rob and Mercury where if I think they said something wrong I go and double check MY facts before I say something. :cool:

Though I am curious how he managed to create a surplus and the debt didn't go down. Sure a paltry few billion wouldn't have so much as made a dent in a debt of several trillion but still.
 
A small quibble about #18. Clinton had a balanced "budget" but he never balanced spending. The last time the debt went down was in the early 50s.

Budgeted spending and actual spending are horses of a different color.



clinton milked the technology boom then enjoyed the Dot Com bubble. other then that, Bill chased skirts and I'm pretty sure Hillary did as well
 
Accounting tricks. There is public debt and intragovernment debt. Clinton took the social security excess and applied it to the public debt, giving the appearance that the public debt went down while ignoring the fact that the intragovernment debt went up. The total debt went up.
 
Accounting tricks. There is public debt and intragovernment debt. Clinton took the social security excess and applied it to the public debt, giving the appearance that the public debt went down while ignoring the fact that the intragovernment debt went up. The total debt went up.

Excess is Excess no? I mean if I understand this properly we had a surplus in a fund of money owed to ourselves in the future. Funds being fungible Clinton decided to put that money where it made him look good but the money was still there no?
 
Excess is Excess no? I mean if I understand this properly we had a surplus in a fund of money owed to ourselves in the future. Funds being fungible Clinton decided to put that money where it made him look good but the money was still there no?

Total debt is important. But so is debt as a ratio to GDP, and who we owe the money to. The concept of government debt is much more complicated than personal or corporate debt, because the government controls the money supply.

It's a balancing act between paying the interest on the debt, keeping confidence in the system, and controlling inflation. In my humble opinion, the Fed has done a pretty good job of that for the past 30 years.

People get freaked out over the value of the debt, but that value can only be considered in comparison to the size of the economy. The alligator in the pond is that the average maturity of the government debt is about 7 years - that is, the government needs to borrow 100% of the debt every 7 years. For the past decade they could borrow that money at low (or even no) interest. But what happens if the interest on short-term bonds goes up?
 
and this is where the Obana is taking America...with the corporate world pretty much stagnate the weight of the obama debt will become a drain till it reaches 100%...add in come obamacare hiccups and America is the next Great Soviet Union


Total debt is important. But so is debt as a ratio to GDP, and who we owe the money to. The concept of government debt is much more complicated than personal or corporate debt, because the government controls the money supply.

It's a balancing act between paying the interest on the debt, keeping confidence in the system, and controlling inflation. In my humble opinion, the Fed has done a pretty good job of that for the past 30 years.

People get freaked out over the value of the debt, but that value can only be considered in comparison to the size of the economy. The alligator in the pond is that the average maturity of the government debt is about 7 years - that is, the government needs to borrow 100% of the debt every 7 years. For the past decade they could borrow that money at low (or even no) interest. But what happens if the interest on short-term bonds goes up?
 
#2 laughable, but then it is from a Soros blog

Then you have the Oblamer Dept. of Justice wanting race based punishment in schools. :cool:
 
Actually I was fact checking myself before I made the mistake of calling Johnny out. Johnny is on the short list along side Hogan, Rob and Mercury where if I think they said something wrong I go and double check MY facts before I say something. :cool:

*grin* Hey...I made a list! :cool:

I admit that I do relish the chance to correct people when they throw incorrect facts around here.

I don't always agree with you Sean, in fact, in my estimation we're about 50/50 split agree/disagree which is sorta unusual for this polarized board, but I find that you make a concerted effort to get your facts right (so you're no fun!).
 
*grin* Hey...I made a list! :cool:

I admit that I do relish the chance to correct people when they throw incorrect facts around here.

I don't always agree with you Sean, in fact, in my estimation we're about 50/50 split agree/disagree which is sorta unusual for this polarized board, but I find that you make a concerted effort to get your facts right (so you're no fun!).

I don't always agree with you either, it feels better than 50/50 but that's not the point. The point is I rarely find you to be lying and or mistaken so if I look up and see your name next to something I think is absolute BS I take the extra second to go and double check that I'm not fucked.

And with Hogan half the time I won't even check, I'll ask him to explain to me why I'm wrong.
 
Number 16 is a demonstrable lie, but you knew it was and didn't care. Course the guy that runs the site you just quoted is a known liar, even in Liberaldom, from the Daily Kos:

FRI JUL 01, 2011 AT 02:10 PM PDT
An Ethical Crisis in Liberal Media?
byLowGeniusFollow

"Matthew Desmond" and his liberal "news" site AddictingInfo_Org blatantly violated journalistic ethics by running a story they knew wasn't accurate. Does the left really need our own Andrew Breitbart? JH doesn't think so, and he's going to tell you why in this video...and why it's vital to call people like this out and put a stop to them before they can do real damage.

(Some content may be blocked by DKOS. You can view the original article at http://www.lowgenius.net/...)

Full article and video here:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/01/990532/-An-Ethical-Crisis-in-Liberal-Media#

King Orfeo and his lying source, debunked.

Actually, that article didn't debunk his source. If you look up each of those individual statements you'll find they're accurate.
 
I have a quibble with five, mostly in that this is one of those cases where the difference between being ignorant as to how your plan would work out or lying REALLY doesn't make much of a difference and I have a hard time believing that he didn't lie anyway.

Do you really? Can't you allow for a bit of sincere optimism? Presidents are as vulnerable to it as the rest of us. And, after all, it's not as if we were talking about any really outrageous optimism here, on the "Invading Iraq will pay for itself!" scale.
 
Back
Top