Sean
We'll see.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Posts
- 96,194
Irony.
Crimes of Passion
- Thread starter subdued_passion
- Start date
Irony.
VaticanAssassin
God Mod
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2011
- Posts
- 12,391
Speaking of people to stupid to have their own opinions....
Sean
We'll see.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Posts
- 96,194
And again.
Saint Peter
shoots left
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2002
- Posts
- 94,046
Firefox did not underline it!
cleaver
Literotica Koro
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2012
- Posts
- 3,662
VaticanAssassin
God Mod
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2011
- Posts
- 12,391
Some people have nothing to hang their hats on but a missing o....
Sean
We'll see.
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2005
- Posts
- 96,194
It doesn't particularly surprise me that it's the really dumb ones supporting the paedo.
Recidiva
Harastal
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Posts
- 89,726
Okay, so you're all about killing the thread and saying I'm infamous and I'm boring, but you're a better writer and you can't leave the thread because you've got to get the last word about how much of a better writer you are.
Gotcha.
Yup, still bored.
SigmundFraud
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2013
- Posts
- 823
This is where you are wrong.
It was criminal. There is no way to get around that. You can keep telling yourself that but like many have said your justifications are the same as many predators.
The first step to better yourself is to own up to your behavior and understand it was wrong.
Now I have had my fill of you. You and hubby are two very sad people.
cleaver
Literotica Koro
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2012
- Posts
- 3,662
SigmundFraud
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2013
- Posts
- 823
This flippant attitude to a serious issue is why many detest you.
Recidiva
Harastal
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Posts
- 89,726
My life is sitting in a beautiful room, singing the soundtrack of "Once On This Island" with my husband, playing a game together and riding a unicorn, making a yummy dinner and petting my cat and hugging my son.
About 6% of my life today is here. I type fast. I also consider it about as "real" of a concern as my unicorn mount, who although I would mourn them if they died suddenly, I would be silly to be sad about for more than a nostalgic way for five minutes.
Dead unicorn. Pity.
Dead "Lit Rep." Pity.
Just because you lack imagination doesn't mean my life reflects that.
HOW_DUMB_R_U
Experienced
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 32
Are you sure it was just a hug? You seem not to be able to distinguish between hugs and carnal knowledge.
cleaver
Literotica Koro
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2012
- Posts
- 3,662
i'm jus riffin
yea.
like, thanks.
you're not stupid enough but to be here 'les you wanted to be...
you're up next. bucket's there.
Phelia
in a submarine
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
- Posts
- 7,432
1. My Twitter handle is @pheliaaah, with three As. It has been a private account since I created it last year because I wanted to share details of my life with people that I like more liberally than I feel I am able to here. Pictures of me, where I live, etc. It's nothing top secret, and I would let most people here who are not Cade follow me, but if my account really was unprotected last night, it would be strange and concerning. Ulaven, you have my permission to post anything "private" that you saw I said. It would be exciting, actually, in the sense that Twitter would have a pretty big security breach and we could all try and hack it.
2. I did talk about you (Recidiva) on Twitter. I said, with the disclaimer that I have never been bothered by the speed or length of your posts (I think it's fun, actually, and refreshing), that you should start an organization called RAMBLA, which really amused me, not because I think you're too talkative or a pedophile, but because it's just funny. I did not say it maliciously or to besmirch your name - I thought the shit-show of a thread was doing a pretty good job of that. I chose not to post it on lit not because I thought you'd get terribly offended (I thought you might even think it was funny), but because I didn't want it to look to other posters like I was hopping on the she's-a-pedo bandwagon even though I thought your actions were wrong. Still, it was behind your back, and I apologize. I also responded to tweets regarding my second loooong-ass post in this thread to the tune of wanting to defend Lorilei, whom I still consider a very nice person. If you're going to be glib about something that sounds, looks, walks, and smells like abuse while claiming it's not, you're going to piss people off.
3. Reci's not unreasonable in being mad about the Twitter thing. She's trying to fight a battle on two fronts and didn't know about the second one. I sympathize - that sucks, and I don't doubt that despite her protestations, this is taking some sort of emotional toll. It's messy shit. On the other hand, it's also not unreasonable that a group of people who like each other talk amongst themselves about a shared experience, i.e. this thread, and it doesn't preclude anyone's ability to form an independent thought.
4. My posts in here were not influenced by anyone else. The only person who actively tried to change my opinion off the boards was butters. It was ultimately ineffective, but I think she's fabulous and really respect her for defending her friends and trying to remain relatively emotionless in her judgment. That's what I'm doing, too, but my judgment is very different.
5. I was thinking of reaching out to both butters and Reci in a PM to clarify, again, but I'll just do it here. Here's the clincher, for me. Did you engage in any sort of sexual explicit conversations with this teenager, treating him as a sexual peer, after you knew his age, at any point - not just after he confessed his age to you? I don't give a flying-fannypack-of-a-fuck if you had to do it to protect his anonymity or persona to the other gamers. In my mind, that makes it worse.
You said it was "not sexual," but you were in an "adult 'game' relationship" with him at that point. What does that mean? Because if you engaged in some spicy conversations with a preteen and didn't know his age but immediately transitioned to a relationship that was strictly platonic when you DID discover his age, it's still a little weird, but it's nowhere near a crime, and you'd think it might have surfaced before this thread hit 40 pages.
Imagine if a male poster, reasonably popular, came in here and said "I cybered a 13-year-old, but I didn't know she was 13! I didn't find out until she was 14 and someone else told me, at which point I kept it to myself and continued an "adult 'game' relationship" until she confessed her age. Then I convinced her to spend more time with me, alone, and eventually asked me to marry her." I don't think it would go over really well. And if that poster responded "It was wrong of me and an incredibly bad judgment call, but I am glad it seems like no one got hurt," some people probably would have gotten past it. If that poster had responded "But it's actually ok, because I really love that girl and she went on to have tons of great sex with other people," well, we'd probably have a 60-page nuclear meltdown.
7. Really, this is not important enough to me to have written this many words about it, so the joke's on me, too, but I dunno. I do care. This is all just such a bummer. I have always really liked you, Reci, which is not to say that I ever thought you were perfect, but it makes this thread feel like that much more of a blow. I think what I think, and at the end of the day that matters quite little, but it matters to me that my thoughts are considered my own.
Disclaimer: The opinions and views expressed in or through this post are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of any of their Twitter friends, unicorns, or the opinions or views of any other individual.
2. I did talk about you (Recidiva) on Twitter. I said, with the disclaimer that I have never been bothered by the speed or length of your posts (I think it's fun, actually, and refreshing), that you should start an organization called RAMBLA, which really amused me, not because I think you're too talkative or a pedophile, but because it's just funny. I did not say it maliciously or to besmirch your name - I thought the shit-show of a thread was doing a pretty good job of that. I chose not to post it on lit not because I thought you'd get terribly offended (I thought you might even think it was funny), but because I didn't want it to look to other posters like I was hopping on the she's-a-pedo bandwagon even though I thought your actions were wrong. Still, it was behind your back, and I apologize. I also responded to tweets regarding my second loooong-ass post in this thread to the tune of wanting to defend Lorilei, whom I still consider a very nice person. If you're going to be glib about something that sounds, looks, walks, and smells like abuse while claiming it's not, you're going to piss people off.
3. Reci's not unreasonable in being mad about the Twitter thing. She's trying to fight a battle on two fronts and didn't know about the second one. I sympathize - that sucks, and I don't doubt that despite her protestations, this is taking some sort of emotional toll. It's messy shit. On the other hand, it's also not unreasonable that a group of people who like each other talk amongst themselves about a shared experience, i.e. this thread, and it doesn't preclude anyone's ability to form an independent thought.
4. My posts in here were not influenced by anyone else. The only person who actively tried to change my opinion off the boards was butters. It was ultimately ineffective, but I think she's fabulous and really respect her for defending her friends and trying to remain relatively emotionless in her judgment. That's what I'm doing, too, but my judgment is very different.
5. I was thinking of reaching out to both butters and Reci in a PM to clarify, again, but I'll just do it here. Here's the clincher, for me. Did you engage in any sort of sexual explicit conversations with this teenager, treating him as a sexual peer, after you knew his age, at any point - not just after he confessed his age to you? I don't give a flying-fannypack-of-a-fuck if you had to do it to protect his anonymity or persona to the other gamers. In my mind, that makes it worse.
You said it was "not sexual," but you were in an "adult 'game' relationship" with him at that point. What does that mean? Because if you engaged in some spicy conversations with a preteen and didn't know his age but immediately transitioned to a relationship that was strictly platonic when you DID discover his age, it's still a little weird, but it's nowhere near a crime, and you'd think it might have surfaced before this thread hit 40 pages.
Imagine if a male poster, reasonably popular, came in here and said "I cybered a 13-year-old, but I didn't know she was 13! I didn't find out until she was 14 and someone else told me, at which point I kept it to myself and continued an "adult 'game' relationship" until she confessed her age. Then I convinced her to spend more time with me, alone, and eventually asked me to marry her." I don't think it would go over really well. And if that poster responded "It was wrong of me and an incredibly bad judgment call, but I am glad it seems like no one got hurt," some people probably would have gotten past it. If that poster had responded "But it's actually ok, because I really love that girl and she went on to have tons of great sex with other people," well, we'd probably have a 60-page nuclear meltdown.
7. Really, this is not important enough to me to have written this many words about it, so the joke's on me, too, but I dunno. I do care. This is all just such a bummer. I have always really liked you, Reci, which is not to say that I ever thought you were perfect, but it makes this thread feel like that much more of a blow. I think what I think, and at the end of the day that matters quite little, but it matters to me that my thoughts are considered my own.
Disclaimer: The opinions and views expressed in or through this post are the opinions of the designated authors and do not reflect the opinions or views of any of their Twitter friends, unicorns, or the opinions or views of any other individual.
Last edited:
Saint Peter
shoots left
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2002
- Posts
- 94,046
Twitter is the devil.
Saint Peter
shoots left
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2002
- Posts
- 94,046
Saint Peter
shoots left
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2002
- Posts
- 94,046
Saint Peter
shoots left
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2002
- Posts
- 94,046
I am SURE she means a nun that has been a nun for 14 years.
Sure of it.
Mother fucking sure.
Sure of it.
Mother fucking sure.
Saint Peter
shoots left
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2002
- Posts
- 94,046
Mother Teresa fucking sure of it.
koalabear
~Armed and Fuzzy~
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
- Posts
- 101,964
No doubt one from St. Mary of the Wood.
