Crimes of Passion

And it couldn't possibly have been the parts about being Republican and Christian in that convenient quote, could it?

Naaaah.

Let's just decide. Giving another human being you dislike a break is too much like work.


Let's back the quote up a bit, shall we? Here's the whole conversation:

He and I have been friends, eventually he lost his virginity to a pair of cheerleaders.

A pair huh? Imagine what he could've done without the rehabilitation.

I tried, but he still went his own way a virgin, evangelist Republican and Christian.

I can't work miracles, just provide fun company.

Want to try again?
 
Want to try again?

Fuck no. You were on ignore long before this shit anyway.

I click on a few posts here and there and it's just mind-meltingly ugly.

You were already jettisoned as a human being a while back, I will not miss you at all.

Some other people yeah, maybe, but mostly I'm just happy to see the lines drawn between people who can read and people who can't.
 
Let's back the quote up a bit, shall we? Here's the whole conversation:







Want to try again?

Thoughts were not crimes back then, not like they are now...

New motto "Rerouting internet traffic since 1975?"
 
Fuck no. You were on ignore long before this shit anyway.

I click on a few posts here and there and it's just mind-meltingly ugly.

You were already jettisoned as a human being a while back, I will not miss you at all.

Some other people yeah, maybe, but mostly I'm just happy to see the lines drawn between people who can read and people who can't.
Calling someone who has not been engaged in a sexual relationship with a minor and then justified it based on the minor's maturity and their own good intentions, is ugly.

Calling someone who has been engaged in a sexual relationship with a minor and then justified it based on the minor's maturity and their own good intentions, simply means I can read.

You tried to answer once. When that one flopped, you decided I wasn't worth talking to.

You truly do think the rest of us are dumb.
 
Fuck no. You were on ignore long before this shit anyway.

I click on a few posts here and there and it's just mind-meltingly ugly.

You were already jettisoned as a human being a while back, I will not miss you at all.

Some other people yeah, maybe, but mostly I'm just happy to see the lines drawn between people who can read and people who can't.

Why would you have Sonny on iggy long before this shit? Seems kinda odd.
 
Because much like you he is a fucking stupid as hell and grade A liar?

Good a guess as any....

You have Ish genes, no room for you to talk about someone being stupid.

Wow, I guess nobody at all read the thread about KRC. Nobody. They're shocked and appalled, they are.

Why oh why, I wonder.

Gosh.

Molesting children is a whole lot worse than portraying the opposite gender on the interwebs.
 
Wow, I guess nobody at all read the thread about KRC. Nobody. They're shocked and appalled, they are.

Why oh why, I wonder.

Gosh.

Well we know the trying to convert him from being a Christian and Republican was a joke so the third part has to be true......

It has to be!!!!
 
Still upset the your cyber buddy KRC is no longer here huh?

:rolleyes:

Did you read the original post or just the doctored spin that she put on her words after?

I get that you dislike Luke and Sonny, I get that. What they're saying isn't incorrect just because you'd enjoy a way to needle them. Please stop in this thread. Take your anger elsewhere.

The point isn't about them.
 
Rob can apparently say anything he wants. It's mystifying but part of his charm.
Bob's my go-to alt when I want to get away with stuff.

I was in a site that was game in essence but the inhabitants were adults. There was a lot of sexually-explicit content and he was involved with it way before I got there. I met him in that context. When I had the opportunity, I drew him away from sexual content and toward gaming content. Roleplaying, killing things.

It was the only way I felt I could intervene and help him out.

Now you can say I should have walked the hell away and not gotten involved at all because obviously - kryptonite.

But after knowing him for years, I actually gave a damn. So I didn't walk away from him, but tried to help him use his time more constructively, i.e. murdering people.

We killed stuff together. I hugged him.

I couldn't have contacted his parents, he was fourteen times smarter than his parents. He'd say "Sorry mom, sorry dad." and be back online within 12 hours.

That does not equal crime in any state.
No, it doesn't.
 
Did you read the original post or just the doctored spin that she put on her words after?

I get that you dislike Luke and Sonny, I get that. What they're saying isn't incorrect just because you'd enjoy a way to needle them. Please stop in this thread. Take your anger elsewhere.

The point isn't about them.

So if I get some support, that's wrong. Because the people who hate me should run untrammeled throughout the halls with scissors and that's okay.

Because someone is wrong on the internet and they should not defend themselves or allow others to do so.

Wings, I've really had it with your "Please, you're hurting people by speaking the truth" while you can't read the truth and you just want to be pissed off about something that didn't happen 20 years ago.

Really. Not my problem. I believe you the first time that you have a hurtful past. But when you keep coming into the damned thread telling other to shut up. Do you know you could stop coming here?
 
You said he RAN A BDSM CYBER SITE.


You are fucking lying and it's ridiculous.
 
Why? Because a random internet citizen who already hates me said so, THAT'S why!

I doubt anyone hated you before this thread. I certainly didn't and still don't. But what you did is disgusting and your arrogance about it is even worse.
 
You said he RAN A BDSM CYBER SITE.


You are fucking lying and it's ridiculous.

You don't think this could be on "ran around on" and not "ran"? No? Where's the original quote and please don't just cut it to suit your needs like Sonny.

You don't get to decide that, and you certainly don't get to decide that only your version of events - which you don't actually know and I do - are the only ones spoken.

You don't have any moral high ground here, you're just deciding something that's not true and you're not only using your personal story to prove that you're right, but you're actually encouraging people to decide with you and quell all dissent.

It's spectacularly hypocritical.
 
Back
Top