Public Display - For Exhibitionists & Voyeurs

Status
Not open for further replies.
Any of these that are 'public' but without onlookers could simply be safe, secluded spots they were taken.

To be truly 'Public Display', we need to see a gathering of onlookers.:)
 
Any of these that are 'public' but without onlookers could simply be safe, secluded spots they were taken.

To be truly 'Public Display', we need to see a gathering of onlookers.:)

:) ZZZ .,, I do agree with You on this .,, I will stop posting immediately.
 
:) ZZZ .,, I do agree with You on this .,, I will stop posting immediately.

Since we are evidently getting into semantics (why I have no idea), regardless of the amount of onlookers, the fact that they are in public and pose in any fashion for the camera, establishes it as a "Public display."
 
Naturalism/Nudism just doesn't appeal to me. What's fun about flashing is being naked where you aren't supposed to be naked. When you take the taboo out of nudity you also take out the fun. Plus, from these nudist resorts for some reason make me think of concentration camps.

On a related note, I very much support the traditional notion that a guy who sleeps with a lot of girls is a stud and a girl who fucks a lot of guys is a filthy dirty cum dumpster. I oppose those who oppose this blatant double standard. Please don't take away my scarlet letter!

ETA: Oops, I meant to post this in the Nudism/Naturism thread, but I guess it applies to this topic too.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top