Justice for Trayvon??

[IrezumiKiss]

*looks above, sniffs air*

Whew! Racist shitstain's making up for lost time! Who slipped him a mickey?

 

[BotanyBoy]

The first part of your post makes zero logical sense. The entire basis for the state's claim that he was guilty of murder was that he did NOT act in self defense.

What I mean is he doesn't have to prove it was self defense, the state has to prove it was murder.

Is it perfect? No, but it's a lot better than the "Lynch whitey!!" pro vigilante shit Irez advocates.

 

[Wrong Element]

Ok. I disagree with you. So let's try another angle, because I'm genuinely trying to gauge where you stand. Theoretically, do you see the exploitability in the laws as currently written? Let's say I have a problem with someone. I confront that person in a public space but with no witnesses. I start to verbally accost that person. Maybe I even assault him/her physically, but not anything that would leave a mark. That person fights back and I sustain injuries. I am not in fear of my life, but I'm fucking pissed, and I'm carrying a legally concealed weapon, and I shoot that person dead. I lie and say it was self defense. The only evidence is my injuries and my testimony. Should I be put on trial? Are the laws designed to uphold justice in this circumstance?

Little Bill Daggett: "Well sir, you are a cowardly son of a bitch! You just shot an unarmed man!"

William Munny: "Well, he should have armed himself."


I think their answer for you will be: Get a gun. We're in the Wild West.

 

[Busybody]

Little Bill Daggett: "Well sir, you are a cowardly son of a bitch! You just shot an unarmed man!"

William Munny: "Well, he should have armed himself."


I think their answer for you will be: Get a gun. We're in the Wild West.

clearly, WE is another SCHMUCK who didn't bother watching the trial evidence

 

[Ishmael]

Ok. I disagree with you. So let's try another angle, because I'm genuinely trying to gauge where you stand. Theoretically, do you see the exploitability in the laws as currently written? Let's say I have a problem with someone. I confront that person in a public space but with no witnesses. I start to verbally accost that person. Maybe I even assault him/her physically, but not anything that would leave a mark. That person fights back and I sustain injuries. I am not in fear of my life, but I'm fucking pissed, and I'm carrying a legally concealed weapon, and I shoot that person dead. I lie and say it was self defense. The only evidence is my injuries and my testimony. Should I be put on trial? Are the laws designed to uphold justice in this circumstance?

That is a theoretical possibility is virtually every state of the union. Self defense is recognized in every state, not just the state of Florida. And contrary to the opinion of some, the "Stand Your Ground" law played no part in this case at all.

And under your scenario you truly would be fairly charged with 2nd degree murder because of the long contentious relationship you have set up. The investigators would have you under a microscope for that very reason.

Is it possible you'd get away with it? Well, anything is possible but not probable. You see you are trying to orchestrate a scenario. A scenario in which the other party, your target, behaves in a 100% predictable manner and the odds of that happening in real life begin to approach 0%. There will be an unanticipated slip up along the way.

Ishmael

 

[IrezumiKiss]

but it's a lot better than the "Lynch whitey!!" shit Irez advocates.

When did I advocate that?

Oh yeah...I didn't.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwb6x5Aj9q1qbdif3o1_250.gif

Stop smoking that hi-grade shit for at least two hours out of your life and go eat a lobster roll, dudebro. I'm buying.

 

[Busybody]

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/roddy-white-apologizes-saying-george-zimmerman-jurors-kill-163111365.html

 

[Busybody]

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/roddy-white-apologizes-saying-george-zimmerman-jurors-kill-163111365.html

Roddy White ✔ @roddywhiteTV

All them jurors should go home tonight and kill themselves for letting a grown man get away with killing a kid


11:03 PM - 13 Jul 2013

3,467 Retweets 1,332 favorites

 

[IrezumiKiss]

^^^

bwahahahahahahahahaha

linked image fail.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdns33XjG31qgfax7.gif

 

[phrodeau]

Make up your mind yellowneck.

Grow a mind, dumbass.

 

[BotanyBoy]

When did I advocate that?

Oh yeah...I didn't.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwb6x5Aj9q1qbdif3o1_250.gif

Stop smoking that hi-grade shit for at least two hours out of your life and go eat a lobster roll, dudebro. I'm buying.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=46888338&postcount=161


http://awesomegifs.com/wp-content/uploads/king-watch.gif



Oh man....lobster rolls sound goooooooooooooooooooooooood. All I got it some chop che and some hot dogs =\ fuck I don't want to go to the store. but if I do that means....
http://foodriotradio.com/wp-content/uploads/Kraft-Mac-and-Cheese.jpg
http://webtrax.hu/myfacewhen/faces/lineart-memes/fuck-yea.jpg

 

[Busybody]

No one cares about BLACK DEAD KIDS

The whole ZIM this is about KEEPING hate alive....so that the COLOREDS are riled up and stay stuck on the plantation...NO ONE REALLY GIVES A FLYING FUCK ABOUT DEAD BLACK "KIDS", NO ONE

Why doesn’t it count when black 17 year olds are killed in Chicago by other blacks?



Hey Jackass!

Eighteen

In light of the not guilty verdict in the George Zimmerman trial, on Friday we asked the following question:

“How many male, black 17 year olds have been shot and killed in Chicago since the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman shooting incident?”

The answer is 18.

18 male, black 17 year olds have been shot and killed in Chicago since 2/26/12. We’d wager that few, if any, could name a single victim or shooter.

Now let’s take the absurd to the extreme and cast a wider net:

First, include all races, 21.

Then add females, 22.

Throw in all causes of death, 24.

Add in all teenagers (13-19), 140.

And finally, expand the timeline back to 2008, 541.

541 teenagers have been murdered in Chicago since 2008 and expect for maybe a few higher profile cases, no one could name them nor probably much cares.

Read more at http://iowntheworld.com/blog/#t2T6KUS9HK1Bdpd6.99

 

[IrezumiKiss]

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=46888338&postcount=161


http://awesomegifs.com/wp-content/uploads/king-watch.gif



Oh man....lobster rolls sound goooooooooooooooooooooooood. All I got it some chop che and some hot dogs =\ fuck I don't want to go to the store. but if I do that means....
http://foodriotradio.com/wp-content/uploads/Kraft-Mac-and-Cheese.jpg
http://webtrax.hu/myfacewhen/faces/lineart-memes/fuck-yea.jpg

I don't see no lynching advocation in that, brah.

http://mrwgifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Leonardo-DiCaprio-Shrug-Reaction-Gif.gif

Get that lobby roll with extra tartar and mayo.

 

[BotanyBoy]

I don't see no lynching advocation in that, brah.

http://mrwgifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Leonardo-DiCaprio-Shrug-Reaction-Gif.gif

Get that lobby roll with extra tartar and mayo.

Seriously? You love the idea of a killer taking justice into his own hands and killing Zimmerman.....

http://i1205.photobucket.com/albums/bb434/Violetmouseful/849e06a751688c2acc4aa89b427f33e8_zpsc6ca6332.jpg

http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x254/gekrepten_2007/academyawards5.gif

Love it, love it.

You wouldn't support a mob doing the same??

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Seriously? You love the idea of a killer taking justice into his own hands and killing Zimmerman.....



You wouldn't support a mob doing the same??

That's not "lynching," guy. That's not even advocating anything.

I'm appreciating the wryly on-point satire of a image joke over topical social matters using a popular television series as a motif.

Kinda similar to what the shitstain contingent here was chuckling over when this was done last year:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploads20/2012+04+24+humor+21335423211.jpg

Get it?

GET IT? SEE WHAT THEY DID THERE?

 

[Beco]

Grow a mind, dumbass.

now, now....name calling is beneath you guys,...

 

[BotanyBoy]

GET IT? SEE WHAT THEY DID THERE?

Yea.......you took it way too seriously.

 

[Busybody]

Jesse Jackson Baffled By The Constitution: Trayvon Martin Denied Jury Of His Peers…




Yeah, Jesse, it is the defendant, not the victim, who’s entitled to an impartial jury.

Via Newsbusters:


JESSE JACKSON: Frankly, I am stunned over this race [?], this tremendous miscarriage of justice. When the jury says not guilty: he’s at least guilty of murder. An armed man, racially pursuing and profiling a young African-American boy, and kills him. And in this case, the prosecutor denied, should I say ignored the matter of race, and the defense denied this. But the fact of the matter is this is a pattern of behavior toward young African-American men, whether it is Grant in Oakland, or Diallo in New York or Trayvon Martin in Florida, and it’s very painful.

MSNBC: Reverend, I want to ask you about the make-up of the jury. You tweeted this after the verdict was handed down, you tweeted: ”The jury, no black and no men, was always suspect.” Do you feel this affected the outcome: the make-up of the jury?

JACKSON: Well, it was a stretch, trying to avoid the obvious. There was no–you speak of jury of your peers: there was no man on the jury—Trayvon was a black boy—there was no man, no black on the jury. So at least the idea of jury of your peers was a stretch all the while.

 

[Busybody]

New Black Panthers: Zimmerman Acquittal Means “War”…




Or as Eric Holder calls the Panthers, “my people.”

Via Aaron Klein:


The George Zimmerman verdict is a declaration of war that only the devil can applaud, according to the Twitter feed for the New Black Panther Party.

The Twitter account, managed by the group’s national chairman, Malik Zulu Shabazz, further urged followers to “take to the streets [and] stay there.”

“Were at war,” Shabbazz Tweeted. “Its (sic) silly and immoral to call for peace when war has been declared.”

The NBPP slammed what it called the “white mans (sic) justice system,” claiming the courts base their law on “the white is right theory.”

“Only a devil would applaud that verdict. Only natural born devil. By applauding that verdict you in fact admit that you are a devil,” wrote Shabbazz.

“The major problem with whites is they see white as exalted over others,” the Twitter feed added.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Yea.......you took it way too seriously.

http://images.wikia.com/glee/images/e/e3/Reaction_-_...,Puzzled_2.gif

What did I take "too seriously?"

The hilarious joke I'm laughing at with Dexter or the tasteless dog eating joke I'm contrasting it to?

 

[phrodeau]

New Black Panthers: Zimmerman Acquittal Means “War”…




Or as Eric Holder calls the Panthers, “my people.”

Via Aaron Klein:


The George Zimmerman verdict is a declaration of war that only the devil can applaud, according to the Twitter feed for the New Black Panther Party.

The Twitter account, managed by the group’s national chairman, Malik Zulu Shabazz, further urged followers to “take to the streets [and] stay there.”

“Were at war,” Shabbazz Tweeted. “Its (sic) silly and immoral to call for peace when war has been declared.”

The NBPP slammed what it called the “white mans (sic) justice system,” claiming the courts base their law on “the white is right theory.”

“Only a devil would applaud that verdict. Only natural born devil. By applauding that verdict you in fact admit that you are a devil,” wrote Shabbazz.

“The major problem with whites is they see white as exalted over others,” the Twitter feed added.

Why do you care what he says? Nobody else does.

 

[doubleover]

Protesters hit the streets of Chicago following the Zimmerman verdict.

No protesters hit the streets of Chicago following local murders.

Might get shot.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

derpp!

 

[Sean]

Why do you care what he says? Nobody else does.

Ah, the NBP. Four guys with berets and an internet connection causing fear in dumb white people since 2004.

 

[Byron In Exile]

How should we deal with those mentally defective people that get hold of guns?

Smear grease on their guns so they can't keep hold of them.