Better Muslims than gays around my kids

Good, that particular post was loaded with poison laced sarcasm and if you weren't offended you are even dumber than you appear in the post I quoted.

I am in awe. Say the word and I'll be your love slave forever (okay, I admit I have an ulterior motive - I'm still seeking my elusive lifestyle - but that doesn't mean I'm not sincere).

You don't have much use for that catching more flies with honey nonsense, do you?
 
I am in awe. Say the word and I'll be your love slave forever (okay, I admit I have an ulterior motive - I'm still seeking my elusive lifestyle - but that doesn't mean I'm not sincere

:eek::(:(:(
 
I would rather have my kids live in a neighborhood with a lot of children from Islamic families than one with a lot of homosexuals.

Both Islamics and homosexuals have terrorist fringes (remember ACT-UP, anybody???), so that's not a reason to hate Islamics. 99.9% of Islamic Americans are law abiding citizens. Unlike gays, though, they are usually God fearing, pro-family values, normal Americans.

I would trust my kids with a teacher who happens to be a Muslim long before I would even consider letting them stay in a class with a homosexual teacher.

Gays make a neighborhood better....just saying
 
What is the origins of this thread of drivvle. Homosexuals are people. Heterosexuals are people. Homosexuals don't want to convert you to their world. Why must the "straights" invest so much energy trying to convert gays to the straight world? Is there not room for both? What are so many straights worried about? Will a gay person's homosexuality rub off on them? If it can then they weren't straight to begin with.

All the people who have been born with different pictures of themselves in their DNA have been putting up with the prejudices of the straight world all their lives. We finally have reached a point where those who are different are acceptable and now I read the absurdities in this thread. "Better muslims than gays around my kids." What the hell does that mean? Muslims include gays. Yes my mentally limited friends, gays can be Muslims and Muslims can be gays. So when you recruit Muslim teachers for your children how will you know if they are gay?

To my knowledge gays are not militant. Many people have fought for gay rights but in my memory not one straight was killed to further the gay life style. Can the Muslims say the same? Of course not. A strong majority of Muslims, I believe, are not blowing up non Muslims. But some Muslims are blowing up non Muslims. Gays are not blowing up straights.

So, what the hell is this thread about? Do people really believe people would have the DNA of heir unborn children altered to remove the "gay" part? A few major fools would do it but I can't see the average person doing something as foolish as that. Being gay in the 21 century is not the stigma it was just 25 to 50 years ago. And, in the future, I don't see people of normal and above intelligence caring about their offspring being gay or bi or TV or TS. We will look back at this ignorance and not believe we were ever so stupid.

You presume Gays are decent, God-fearing folks like everyone else. In fact, Gays are one more varmint after the chickens.

What I expect is a prenatal test for Gay and a quick flush of the problem.
 
I am in awe. Say the word and I'll be your love slave forever (okay, I admit I have an ulterior motive - I'm still seeking my elusive lifestyle - but that doesn't mean I'm not sincere).

You don't have much use for that catching more flies with honey nonsense, do you?

I'm a farmer, we catch flies with sticky strips hanging from the barn rafters. The flies land of their own accord, no reason to waste good honey.

If you find the gay lifestyle, please, please, please send some to me, I've been feeling a lot like a nearing-middle-age-mother of late and need something more if I'm to remain free and gay. My current partner will have to move to the green bedroom if you're to be my new love slave, but we've done that half a dozen times already so it's a "no biggie".
 
No, I am not building Rob up. Yes, it's offensive.

What is offensive in Rob's speech is the stereotyping, the generalization of a race.

You spoke generally and specifically, though.

You just likened being gay to being mental retarded. And you just called kbate an aberration to her face.

3 to 5% is an aberration.

ab·er·ra·tion (b-rshn)
n.
1. A deviation from the proper or expected course. See Synonyms at deviation.
2. A departure from the normal or typical: events that were aberrations from the norm.
3. Psychology A disorder or abnormal alteration in one's mental state.
4.
a. A defect of focus, such as blurring in an image.
b. An imperfect image caused by a physical defect in an optical element, as in a lens.
5. The apparent displacement of the position of a celestial body in the direction of motion of an observer on Earth, caused by the motion of Earth and the finite velocity of light.
6. Genetics A deviation in the normal structure or number of chromosomes in an organism.

This is the same problem that your side of the conversation has with the definition of words like racism and marriage. You do not give a shit what it means; it is just a way of ending a conversation by classifying any opposition as hate speech.

That is fucking pathetic.
 
;) ;)

You can choose to move to Missourah...

all together, you are an insignificant aberration.

kansas = 2.8 million
Missouri = 6 million

A mere 3% of america, unworthy of recognition at the federal level, possibly so few as to be a genetic defect we could breed out in a couple generations.
 
3 to 5% is an aberration.



This is the same problem that your side of the conversation has with the definition of words like racism and marriage. You do not give a shit what it means; it is just a way of ending a conversation by classifying any opposition as hate speech.

That is fucking pathetic.

1. the act of departing from the right, normal, or usual course.
2. the act of deviating from the ordinary, usual, or normal type.
3. deviation from truth or moral rectitude.

I can't help but consider your equating homosexuality to Down's Syndrome when I decipher how you used the word.

Blue eyes are becoming an "aberration."

Do you think parents will abort fetuses who show the genetic markers for blue eyes?
 
Democrats are slick in how they relentlessly re-define words and neuter original meaning so that communication becomes Babel, as Forrest says. Coining new words takes too long for their agenda.
 
I think you are going a little out of your way to take a shot at me and build Throb up.

I spoke generically, he spoke specifically.

You speak stupid.

And yet, both are equally offensive.

You're a disgrace just like Rob is.
 
Yesterday for my gay studies lecture, "How to Offend a Breeder," I decided that it would be more effective if I taught while only wearing rainbow painted tampons as a belt. That keeps their attention, pleases the radical feminists and has worked for almost 8 years in keeping my "edge'.

Afterward, I drink myself into a stupor and shout gay slogans at passerby just to let them know I'm still queer.

Breeder, I haven't heard that in many a-year! LOL
 
I can't help but consider your equating homosexuality to Down's Syndrome when I decipher how you used the word.

Blue eyes are becoming an "aberration."

Do you think parents will abort fetuses who show the genetic markers for blue eyes?

Look, you were already outed on playing the game. Anyone can play it; it is so easy...

Why did you rush to kbate's defense by attacking me with false definition and accusation equating my strict Scientific use of a word with a man who openly says that I fuck my own daughter?

Well, obviously it must be her sexuality. Gay people, in your opinion must be too fragile and delicate to speak for themselves, so you used affirmative homophile action to do that which she is simply incapable of, taking me to task for what you deem a "personal attack." As we all know, the lady is a fucking shrinking violet who will just turn the other cheek and meekly beg for another good bitch-slap...

So you are patronizing her based upon her sexual orientation.

Or maybe, it is her sex? Maybe your proclivity to misogyny forced you to rush to be her big strong man, because as the weaker sex, she obviously needs you to stand up to me...

Or, and this may be more the ticket, you are so fucking arrogant that you thought she was too st-st-st-stupid to "get" what you saw and needed to be told that she had been "insulted" because you are so bright that you can see behind the definition to drowse and divine the hidden implied intend of my overall generic point.

Now, there are three serious charges that you need to answer to because it is clear that you are a human piece of garbage, just like ThrobDownSouth, who went on a personal attack against kbate that was comprised of patronization, misogyny, and belittlement of her intelligence.
 
all together, you are an insignificant aberration.

kansas = 2.8 million
Missouri = 6 million

A mere 3% of america, unworthy of recognition at the federal level, possibly so few as to be a genetic defect we could breed out in a couple generations.

You left out Injun...


;) ;)
 
Look, you were already outed on playing the game. Anyone can play it; it is so easy...

Why did you rush to kbate's defense by attacking me with false definition and accusation equating my strict Scientific use of a word with a man who openly says that I fuck my own daughter?

Well, obviously it must be her sexuality. Gay people, in your opinion must be too fragile and delicate to speak for themselves, so you used affirmative homophile action to do that which she is simply incapable of, taking me to task for what you deem a "personal attack." As we all know, the lady is a fucking shrinking violet who will just turn the other cheek and meekly beg for another good bitch-slap...

So you are patronizing her based upon her sexual orientation.

Or maybe, it is her sex? Maybe your proclivity to misogyny forced you to rush to be her big strong man, because as the weaker sex, she obviously needs you to stand up to me...

Or, and this may be more the ticket, you are so fucking arrogant that you thought she was too st-st-st-stupid to "get" what you saw and needed to be told that she had been "insulted" because you are so bright that you can see behind the definition to drowse and divine the hidden implied intend of my overall generic point.

Now, there are three serious charges that you need to answer to because it is clear that you are a human piece of garbage, just like ThrobDownSouth, who went on a personal attack against kbate that was comprised of patronization, misogyny, and belittlement of her intelligence.

I don't think she's fragile at all.

I certainly know she's more intelligent than me. And you.

I just think you're a dick. And I explained why.

Rob is too. You're just no better than he is.

Need a hand to get back up on your high horse?
 
Back
Top