How can democrats, liberals, leftwingers and women be so stupid?

[unregistered]

 

[Sean]

Actually, I did give some support to Newt, midget.

The first speaker ever to be reprimanded for ethics violations? Newt who was ousted by his own party because he was a liability? That Newt?

 

[cjh]

That's cuz people like you don't give a shit, don't have the wherewithal to give a shit about anything except the here and now. Adults and parents have to worry, they have a stake in the future. The communist you voted for has a stake in the future too, but his view of command order economics was repudiated when the Iron Curtain came down. He was a dope smoking chump at the time and probably doesn't remember.

So, do fuck off with your childish inner city bullshit.

I'm an adult. I'm a parent. I have the "wherewithal to give a shit."

I do give a shit. That's why I hope my offspring don't have to live in the society you would champion.

That's why I work to try to help prevent that from happening.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

That's cuz people like you don't give a shit, don't have the wherewithal to give a shit about anything except the here and now. Adults and parents have to worry, they have a stake in the future. The communist you voted for has a stake in the future too, but his view of command order economics was repudiated when the Iron Curtain came down. He was a dope smoking chump at the time and probably doesn't remember.

So, do fuck off with your childish inner city bullshit.

"Inner city bullshit?"

You live more of a Lay-Z-Boy lifestyle than I ever have or will.

Bitch, step off and go back to derping your old white male suburbanite fears of the "other" while playing Cold War with your G.I. Joe green soldier men like the perpetually strapped and pressed 1950s-era schmuck you were born into.

What a fucking relic you are.

 

[dan_c00000]

That URL is blocked.

How annoying! Let's try this.

http://grist.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/climate-flowchart_final2.jpg?w=900

 

[RobDownSouth]

Actually, I did give some support to Newt, midget.

You are one lying sack of Marine Corps shit.

I challenged you several times to go on record with your candidate of choice last year.

After 25 or so primary debates, you still whined that you "didn't know enough about the candidates" to endorse one.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean]

What can I say, the pickings were slim, the lesser evil. I certainly wasn't going to come out for a Marxist, like you might.

I'd love to see a Marxist in the White House. Can't se it happening in my lifetime, though.

You know Newt was the prime mover for the biggest expansion of socialist healthcare in US history, right?

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[KingOrfeo]

The communist you voted for . . .

You mean, Middle-Man?

http://thismodernworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/TMW2011-07-20colorlowres.jpg

 

[KingOrfeo]

To the public at large, the global warming hoax is a dead issue, as it should be.

Most Americans Favor Action on Climate Change

Your source is a fucking ivy league college and a sociology paper?

My source is a recent public-opinion poll. If you don't like that one, here's another. You won't find one that says any different. And BTW, why does "ivy league" raise your denial-alarm?

WASHINGTON (AP) — Nearly 4 out of 5 Americans now think temperatures are rising and that global warming will be a serious problem for the United States if nothing is done about it, a new Associated Press-GfK poll finds.

Belief and worry about climate change are inching up among Americans in general, but concern is growing faster among people who don't often trust scientists on the environment. In follow-up interviews, some of those doubters said they believe their own eyes as they've watched thermometers rise, New York City subway tunnels flood, polar ice melt and Midwestern farm fields dry up.

Overall, 78 percent of those surveyed said they thought temperatures were rising and 80 percent called it a serious problem. That's up slightly from 2009, when 75 percent thought global warming was occurring and just 73 percent thought it was a serious problem. In general, U.S. belief in global warming, according to AP-GfK and other polls, has fluctuated over the years but has stayed between about 70 and 85 percent.

The biggest change in the polling is among people who trust scientists only a little or not at all. About 1 in 3 of the people surveyed fell into that category.

Within that highly skeptical group, 61 percent now say temperatures have been rising over the past 100 years. That's a substantial increase from 2009, when the AP-GfK poll found that only 47 percent of those with little or no trust in scientists believed the world was getting warmer.

This is an important development because, often in the past, opinion about climate change doesn't move much in core groups — like those who deny it exists and those who firmly believe it's an alarming problem, said Jon Krosnick, a Stanford University social psychologist and pollster. Krosnick, who consulted with The Associated Press on the poll questions, said the changes the poll shows aren't in the hard-core "anti-warming" deniers, but in the next group, who had serious doubts.

 

[phrodeau]

(edited)

Humans like the temperature as it is now.

You obviously weren't in Australia in January.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

My source is a recent public-opinion poll. If you don't like that one, here's another. You won't find one that says any different. And BTW, why does "ivy league" raise your denial-alarm?

Ivy League schools are just hotbeds of communist neo-Marxist Lberals of course. You're much better off getting your climate change facts from Alex Jones.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

What a fucking turd you are.

That's the best you got? Referencing your closet scat fetish?

http://i.imgur.com/JoWlG.gif

 

[KingOrfeo]

You say global warming is a scam, then say it's warming on Mars.

Those statements are incongruent.

Is the Earth warming or not?

Oh, that again . . .

It has been hotter in the past so it is just cyclical

While it is true that there have been cyclical patterns of temperature changes throughout our planet's history, this does not mean that causes are unknown, unknowable, or all the same. The application of the scientific method is great for working out cause/effect relationships. Scientists have managed to link several warming and cooling cycles in the geologic history to specific causes. They have also shown that the modern warming is due to the added output of humans burning fossil fuels and destroying carbon sinks.

The existence of previous warming cycles does not negate the seriousness of the current one. These previous cycles destroyed a great deal of life on the planet, and if similar effects occurred today they would probably destroy all of human civilization, along with the humanity that created it. This does mean that the earth itself will survive, but that no denialist would be around to gloat.

Global warming has more to do with the sun than the earth

Changes in the sun have not been responsible for recent climatic trends; there has not been any significant change in the total energy output of the sun since we have started measuring it, and no changes in the sun or sun phenomenon correlate with increased temperatures. One thing that can change is small perturbations in the orbit of the earth that draw the planet closer or further from the sun. These perturbations might be linked to the start of several of the major climate changes in the geologic history of the earth. Nonetheless, the actual change in temperature due to these orbital changes is small and the large scale changes are due to feedback loops localized to earth pushing things in one direction or another.

There is no evidence that such an orbital shift is happening now, but even if it has, it can only explain a very small percentage of the increase in global temperature. This issue was also a point of contention in the Soon and Baliunas controversy.

It must be the sun because Mars and Pluto are warming too

Many of the planets and moons in our solar system are big enough and geologically active enough to have both an atmosphere and a climate. In any given system there will be some planets increasing in temperature and some decreasing in temperature. This is due to changes in the localized climate, just as it is with earth. The causes are different for each planet and have little to no bearing on each other.

Even if the sun does have a role, it is not likely that our own activities are helping the situation. It would actually be even more incentive to temper our works, because anthropogenic activity combined with solar activity obviously equals even higher rates of warming.

 

[CandiCame]

I'd really like some anime.

I'm not shocked.

Here's some bishoen slenderman that's been sitting around my folder a while.

http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs70/f/2012/235/8/d/slenderman_with_a_face_by_takocos-d5c40yq.jpg