How can democrats, liberals, leftwingers and women be so stupid?

[Ulaven_Demorte]

~~~

Not that anyone is reading or doing the research, but in reading the preface to both charts your referenced above, one can observe the manipulation of raw data that is uploaded to agencies around the world six different versions in one month, all with different predictions.

The first assumption, by presentintg NOAA data, is that the agency with without an agenda, is wrong. It is a government agency with a political agenda, like every other government agency.

******

"« Another Scary IPCC Climate Change Bomb Defused - Scientists Say Greenhouse Gas Fear Overblown | Main | The Embarrassing & Total Collapse of The IPCC's Antarctica Alarmist "Science" »


"Science" By Lubchenco's NOAA: Fake Global Warming By Changing Historical Temperature Data


To promote the global warming scare, Jane Lubchenco's NOAA continuously changes past temperature records to create fake warming - on a monthly basis

When one starts working with temperature data from various climate research agencies, one begins to notice rather bizarre style of science that would likely qualify as fraud in the mind of a normal person. "

Your source information is faulty, thus your conclusion are in error and, once again, you are wrong.

amicus

*****

Edited to add:

CO2 Science



. Mission Statement
________________________________________
The Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change was created to disseminate factual reports and sound commentary on new developments in the world-wide scientific quest to determine the climatic and biological consequences of the ongoing rise in the air's CO2 content. It meets this objective through weekly online publication of its CO2 Science magazine, which contains editorials on topics of current concern and mini-reviews of recently published peer-reviewed scientific journal articles, books, and other educational materials….

As noted by Wofsy (2001), however, the rate of CO2 accumulation in the atmosphere over the past two decades "has stayed the same or even declined slightly,"…

Additionally, one must question the emphasis on CO2, at an average of 380 ppm over the past centuries, is the least of the the so called 'greenhouse gases' in the atomosphere.

You might also ask why such individuals and groups are pushing the faulty science of global warming when there is no such thing that is caused by man?

What is there to gain by promoting false information? Control is what they want, to control the activities of man and direct those activities in an acceptable manner for the communal left concept of existence.

Maniind is not to be controlled and directed by these wet lipped deviant intellectuals, mankind, you and I, are to be free to driect our own lives to our own happiness. Not some asinine Marxist goal that no rational person wants any part of.

amicus veritas

So it's all just a big multinational conspiracy? With scientists working independently all over the world "in on it"?

*laugh*

I wasn't aware that Alex "nutjob" Jones had a Lit account.

 

[phrodeau]

You became one.

Eat me.

 

[amicus]

So it's all just a big multinational conspiracy? With scientists working independently all over the world "in on it"?

*laugh*

I wasn't aware that Alex "nutjob" Jones had a Lit account.

~~~

You have difficulty understanding the motive behind agreeing with the uS EPA and getting of money in grants or in outright gifts to governments if only they....?

The US of A wants you to do something, wise leaders usually never quiblle...you've not heard of the IPCC and Hockey Stick scandal where thought to ber reputable scientists lied their asses off for a few dollars more?

That is a classic avoiadance argument, attempted ridicule of your oponent, omg you are stupid enough to think it is a conspiracy?

asshole

amicus

 

[amicus]

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/08/world/world-climate-change/index.html[/QUOTE

~~~

Using CNN as a source? Are you kidding me?

That fucking network is so left it is all most right...

amicus

 

[amicus]

Most Americans Favor Action on Climate Change

~~~

Your source is a fucking ivy league college and a sociology paper?

"A large majority of Americans now say global warming should be a priority for the president and Congress, according to a new report by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. "


Jesus Christ man, you should be ashamed...oh, right, liberals feel not shame...

fucking moron

amicus

 

[HAL_9000]

Billions of years of carbon sequestration...

In a mere century the release of millions of tons of previously confined CO2.

"It's a natural process!"


Except that humanity isn't natural.

 

[amicus]

Billions of years of carbon sequestration...

In a mere century the release of millions of tons of previously confined CO2.

"It's a natural process!"


Except that humanity isn't natural.[/QUOTE]

~~~

You gave away one of the deep dark secrets of statists everywhere..."Humanity isn't natural..." oh, really?

Just like the garden of eden, eve tasted of the tree of knowledge...she broke from faith and belief and began to use rational thought as a guide. for that she was ejected from paradise...


you dumb fuck liberals hate mankind because we think and act ratiionally and all you can do, like the fatithful christians, is read and believe...theirs is the bible, yours, das kapital, except you never read it you just sucked it up by osmosis, you shithead...

This is important, folks, althugh I make light of it with this idiot, but the avarice towards those who use reason and rationality to determine moral action comes about because the left is and always has been, back to Plato, of a hive mentality wherein individual thought is not accepted, only the collective is worshipped.

They really don't get it, or me, and you shold know that, they are really that stupid and limited in their thinkingl if it is not approved by the groupl it doesn't exist.

These pukes have no individual existence, none at all, I think they even hold hands as they take a dump, to frightened to be alone, ever...

yean, so mankind is not natural, huh?

I didn't think anyone could really be that stupid.. I admit...I was wrong, you are more than stupid...I need a better word...

amicus

 

[phrodeau]

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/08/world/world-climate-change/index.html[/QUOTE

~~~

Using CNN as a source? Are you kidding me?

That fucking network is so left it is all most right...

amicus

~~~

Your source is a fucking ivy league college and a sociology paper?

"A large majority of Americans now say global warming should be a priority for the president and Congress, according to a new report by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. "


Jesus Christ man, you should be ashamed...oh, right, liberals feel not shame...

fucking moron

amicus

You want to forget the facts and criticize the sources instead? You want to compare highly acclaimed and long-established institutions of information with the stuff you copy from a mail-order pamphlet you learned about in an ad on the back page of Survivor Magazine?

 

[Sean Renaud]

~~~

For those with no past and no future, you have a small point.

Let me attempt to educate you, just a little, too much might kill you. Traditional, aka, natural, is where a woman chooses a man to impregnate her based on his ability to provide for and protect her and her child.

If the society is isolated and there are too many males, then the woman accepts the support of several. If, on the other hand, too many females, each is shared; gut these are exceptions and do not break the rule. Are you still with me or shall I repeat that for you, slowly?

Secondly, there is a very good reason to have children; children are, by definition, the only path to human happiness.

Nowl..you do have to have some small understanding of nature and nature's imperatives to understand, so I will spell it out for you.

The first is that life will struggle to survive in any environment.

Second, behind survival of the individual, is survival of the species, i.e., reproduction. Beginning to see the light?

Exrtrapolate then, that the purpose of life is to reproduce, that and nothing more, save the strong survive, the weak do not. (you lose)

That being self evident and axiomatic, then fulfillment of that imperative to reproduce, is the definition of human satisfaction, e.g. happiness.

And that, you dimwitted statist is the reason to have children.

There is more, but you will have to pay.

amicus

Children are the only path to happiness? You're insane. Worse you don't hold up to your own ideals that people are individuals with individual souls and goals. You believe we are as collective as the worst socialist ever born.

You claim that reproduction is the only way to survive but like the rest of your thoughts are iffy at best. The fact is that mankind has advanced beyond such petty things. Or to use a famous phrase "any fool can make a baby, but it takes a man to be a father." You however have shown you believe the exact opposite. You don't believe that your teachings and philosophy are more important than your sperm. You don't realize that you are Ayn Rand's child far more than your own mother's and that you've gained more from the Founding Fathers than your own father.

Ami, I love you. I love you because you are the perfect example of what's wrong with your philosophy and by example you make everybody who doesn't call you a fool look foolish.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

~~~

You have difficulty understanding the motive behind agreeing with the uS EPA and getting of money in grants or in outright gifts to governments if only they....?

The US of A wants you to do something, wise leaders usually never quiblle...you've not heard of the IPCC and Hockey Stick scandal where thought to ber reputable scientists lied their asses off for a few dollars more?

That is a classic avoiadance argument, attempted ridicule of your oponent, omg you are stupid enough to think it is a conspiracy?

asshole

amicus

No moron, I think that you're stupid enough to think that it's a conspiracy. Apparently, based on your statements, you do.

 

[amicus]

Children are the only path to happiness? You're insane. Worse you don't hold up to your own ideals that people are individuals with individual souls and goals. You believe we are as collective as the worst socialist ever born.

You claim that reproduction is the only way to survive but like the rest of your thoughts are iffy at best. The fact is that mankind has advanced beyond such petty things. Or to use a famous phrase "any fool can make a baby, but it takes a man to be a father." You however have shown you believe the exact opposite. You don't believe that your teachings and philosophy are more important than your sperm. You don't realize that you are Ayn Rand's child far more than your own mother's and that you've gained more from the Founding Fathers than your own father.

Ami, I love you. I love you because you are the perfect example of what's wrong with your philosophy and by example you make everybody who doesn't call you a fool look foolish.

~~~

That is civil, if a bit snarky throughout...

As a younger man and student of life, I would have put forth that the acquisition of knowledge would give man the happiness and fulfillment for a lifetime. I might have said a successful career in any field, a work or works of art put before and appreciated by others, might give one satisfaction.

And I would be partially correct in all of them, but not wholly.

Even though the vast majority of our populatin lives in metropolitan areas, far from the pull of nature, it still calls out to them as they trek to the pristine hinterland they so carefully preserve.

If you have ever held a newborn infant in your arms are realizxed the total dependcy that child lives under, you might have felt that awesome imperative that nature place in us all...the urgent desire to have and protect and love such a replication of ones' self.

No doubt women more than men, and watch them coo ovef a baby no matter whose it might be.

They say at death, a man ejaculates in one last effort to continue his line...I dunno about that, but it fits in terms of the survival of species and the maintenance of the life of the individual.

This is something so fundamental, so primitive in those ancient parts of the brain, and so urgent that it cannot be denied. Well, of course it can, you can have an hysterectomy or a vasectomy and settle the issue physically for the time being. But the psychological imperative remains regardless.

I quoted and noone like that statistic that the only women whose birth rate increased was those between 40 and 44 years of age...those who put off child birth as long as they could, but then felt it was worth the risk to bear a child.

To mek that in effect, confirms my argument in a small way.

But the purpose for which I gather those facts, was to counter the faulty and phony over populatiion guru's who may have ruined thousand or millions of young female lives by convining them not to start a family and add to the population.

Everyone seems to applaud the decrease in teen births, not I, I think the younger, within reason, the better. As a woman reaches her prime at age twenty five (do the research) she becomes so set in her ways that she makes a poor mother. The working mother is also a travesty in child raising.

I know I will get some of you to cnsider my premise and perhaps even one to follow it, change their lifeplan, go find a man and get with the program...I was once told when I first began lecturing, that even if I changed the mind of only one person, it was an accomplishment and I should appreciate it.

So, Sean Renaud;43497401, who ever and whatever you are, I am not the fool, I rather think you might be. Perhaps a suggestion on what replaces motherhood and a family and all that it entails?

amicus

 

[Sean Renaud]

God I love a good check mate and this is amongst the best. You didn't even attempt to refute anything I said really other than to claim again that children are the only path to happiness. I've held newborns. My siblings and cousins are much much older than I am. I mean I have cousins older than my mother they simply don't do it for me. I actually don't like children much at all. That however isn't the point.

The point being of course that you simply fabricate facts.

 

[amicus]

What, you are frightened that one of your cohorts here will see you penned a civil response and take your membership away?

When a liberal exhausts its mental capacity to conceptualize,it always asks for numbers, facts, not realizing that such things are drawn from abstractions.

Who cares about your family or what you think about children? Absolutely no one and it is not relevant to the discussion, but the liberal emo approach to all things. "I feel therefore it is..."

A take on Descartes, "I think therefore I am", he got it backwards, "I am thereforee I think" would be accurate.

Just because you think it does not make it so, tough lesson for you to learn.

No one seems much impressed with the eighty percent of this current generation that will remain single all their lives. I suppose dating services will flourish?

It must be a bitter pill to swallow, all you selfish altruiists who think only of yourselves and then find you have lost the option to create a family.

Those communal families don't seem to last very long, if that is your thinking, but then again, neither do traditional ones anymore.

Age thirty five and you are all done with life, eh?

such a deal

amicus

 

[mercury14]

What, you are frightened that one of your cohorts here will see you penned a civil response and take your membership away?

When a liberal exhausts its mental capacity to conceptualize,it always asks for numbers, facts, not realizing that such things are drawn from abstractions.

Who cares about your family or what you think about children? Absolutely no one and it is not relevant to the discussion, but the liberal emo approach to all things. "I feel therefore it is..."

A take on Descartes, "I think therefore I am", he got it backwards, "I am thereforee I think" would be accurate.

Just because you think it does not make it so, tough lesson for you to learn.

No one seems much impressed with the eighty percent of this current generation that will remain single all their lives. I suppose dating services will flourish?

It must be a bitter pill to swallow, all you selfish altruiists who think only of yourselves and then find you have lost the option to create a family.

Those communal families don't seem to last very long, if that is your thinking, but then again, neither do traditional ones anymore.

Age thirty five and you are all done with life, eh?

such a deal

amicus

How did you spend your socialist Social Security check this month and how is your socialist Medicare eye post-op care going?

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

When a liberal exhausts its mental capacity to conceptualize,it always asks for numbers, facts, not realizing that such things are drawn from abstractions...

Most people with an IQ over room temperature recognize that the exact opposite is true: abstractions are drawn from facts. You would have learned this had you stayed in high school.

Just because you think it does not make it so

^^^Probably the most ironic comment to ever escape your pie hole.

 

[Sean Renaud]

What, you are frightened that one of your cohorts here will see you penned a civil response and take your membership away?

When a liberal exhausts its mental capacity to conceptualize,it always asks for numbers, facts, not realizing that such things are drawn from abstractions.

Who cares about your family or what you think about children? Absolutely no one and it is not relevant to the discussion, but the liberal emo approach to all things. "I feel therefore it is..."

A take on Descartes, "I think therefore I am", he got it backwards, "I am thereforee I think" would be accurate.

Just because you think it does not make it so, tough lesson for you to learn.

No one seems much impressed with the eighty percent of this current generation that will remain single all their lives. I suppose dating services will flourish?

It must be a bitter pill to swallow, all you selfish altruiists who think only of yourselves and then find you have lost the option to create a family.

Those communal families don't seem to last very long, if that is your thinking, but then again, neither do traditional ones anymore.

Age thirty five and you are all done with life, eh?

such a deal

amicus

Still you fail you make a point. Of course none can be made but you like to hear yourself talk. The current generation is the future, we win simply because we can wait you out. Try again.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

My my, the liberal spittle slinging is a downright bio-hazard in here.

Can't hold a candle next to the daily derp drool from the fuzzy facial rectums of you yappy conservatives, though.

 

[butters]

~~~

Attempting to lower my verbiage to the liberal level of incompetence, I brake for all you HIV positive addicts who live off the healthy, I brake for all the queers whose assholes are falling out from misusel I brake for all the confused pervents who can't navigate the sexual identify bridge to sanity.

amicus

just break and be done with it

 

[amicus]

Still you fail you make a point. Of course none can be made but you like to hear yourself talk. The current generation is the future, we win simply because we can wait you out. Try again.

~~~

As if waiting ever won anything...passive verb

wait until they round you up and make lard out of you


amicus

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean Renaud]

~~~

As if waiting ever won anything...passive verb

wait until they round you up and make lard out of you


amicus

Waiting never won anything? I see you're not a business owner. What else are you lying about?

 

[bra_man69]

Waiting never won anything? I see you're not a business owner. What else are you lying about?

Coach what have you ever won? You're not a business owner yourself and yes we all know you lie.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

There's one fuzzy facial rectum that beats all, and that's the horribly distended prolapsed example you flap to voice your opinion.

Since we're going with this theme, with the racist shitstain company you keep perpetually boosting your own craptastic spoor with their special eau de pathetique, toilet paper rolls doubling as napkins make the perfect dinner table compliment to your jowl stoma.

 

[mercury14]

Using CNN as a source? Are you kidding me?

That fucking network is so left it is all most right...

amicus

You realize that CNN wasn't actually involved in the study, right? Just because a network reports something doesn't mean the journalist did the thing they're reporting on.