- Joined
- Apr 10, 2001
- Posts
- 66,709
Well, that's sort of a trick question, and you haven't exactly stated your position, merely your opposition to mine. I will make a few assumptions here, and if I'm incorrect, I sincerely apologize, and I don't say that facetiously.
What I am gathering is your solution; continuing on the path that we're on, will lead to the sub-Saharan desert growing by leaps and bounds.
I don't think that advocating a corporate "benefactor" model will do much to promote humanitarian welfare in either the short term, or the long term.
Let me ask you this; how much will corporations have to spend to find a replacement planet? Just give an educated guess.
The sentence in enlarged font is incorrect. I think a change is required, but where you require a fundamental shift in humanity to achieve your goals - a shift that has never happened on a global scale in our history - my change is focused centrally on using economic drivers to change our behaviour. In other words, you want people to do the right thing all the time. I want to incent people to do the right thing because that's where the money is. It speaks to our nature instead of a requiring forced re-write in order to preserve humanity.