mercury14
Pragmatic Metaphysician
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2009
- Posts
- 22,158
Because, as repeatedly demonstrated, when it comes to their goals and agenda, Democrats will tell any lie to get where they want to go and break any law to get what they want to get which is why we keep telling you that what you think what the law says is irrelevant, what matters is the regulations that Sebelius, who is currently running around breaking election law to campaign for Obama, will write to do what she thinks is best for her wards and what she interprets the intent of the law to be...
That is why you screaming that the article does not say a thing about your baby, the iPAB is a distraction, a misdirection, a red herring as one might say.
It is also clear that you will go out of your way not to understand that which is clear and evident because it is your guy, not a Republican.
We see that everything Romney says, to you, is a lie.
Cannot wait to see you guys go 180° again...
So the literal text of the law isn't a good source as to what's in the law?
Sibelius can't make death panels either. You're batting .000 on this topic again today.