Ever try to talk with a Liberal? Don't...

And Lord knows she probably isn't strong enough to hold up half a dozen spare tires of distortion searching for your reality zone either, not to mention the ensuing nausea were she able to succeed. Ya big dunce:rolleyes: :D

SwineDownSouth has no reality zone. He lies to himself, and believes it.
 
His buddy Miles does too. Did you see Miles' commentary today about how high school age girls can be "controlled"?

i finally went back and read the quote. i fail to see how you draw predator out of that. i read control as 'under the legal responsibility of the parents.' to be honest, miles' posts have never really interested me.
 
As usual, we see the Amicus Support Group cheering on his impeccable logic as he once again proves that a One Man/one Woman Definition of marriage is the only possible definition of marriage by telling us that One Man/One Woman marriage is the only logical definition of marriage. Circular logic much? Petitio Principii?

Even as he yells, "Red Herring" to dismiss a comparative argument, even as he uses logical fallacies as his only argument.

Yep, he's a great debater. Cheer him on, cheer him on because he's RIGHT.

*yawn*

~~~

A shame Kbate was born with a twat...there is a mind behind all the fluff, just screaming to escape the female cage she is locked in.

Never ever a word of substance; always attack the man....wish we could do it between the sheets...just once....for six hours

well at least her avatars are classy

amicus:rose:
 
Both men had the children as a result of a proper one man/one woman union but their wives died and because the children were doomed anyway because they were no longer in a one man/one woman protective household, the men got together to suffer their doom as an improper supportive unit.

~~~~

I call you a liar. Document that!

Amicus VERITAS:rose:
 
One day I'm going to meet Amicus and hug him. Not just because I believe he was never hugged as a child but because I'd like to rub my liberal all over him, also my bisexuality. I wonder if he would go up in flames?

It's worth a try.

~~~

i don't hug fat. odiferous women with warts.

ami

:)
 
If you even walked near the Radiant Protective Aura of a man possessing the Self Assured Masculinity and Palpable Intellectual Ability of an Amicus, your 'Bi" would fly from your "bisexuality" instantly and you would immediately present yourself for insemination and marriage.

~~~

You bet your sweet ass...well said, sugarplum, I resemble those remarks...heh:)

der ami:rose:
 
Why would you need a lawyer for a self published e-book vanity project? :confused:

~~~

Personal slander and libel are actionable even should it be written on your dinner napkins, also known as toilet paper

When the queers start accusing me of loving women, they are really fucked.

Amicus
 
~~~

Personal slander and libel are actionable even should it be written on your dinner napkins, also known as toilet paper

When the queers start accusing me of loving women, they are really fucked.

Amicus

Does anyone else think this post says what I think it says?
 
I didn't expect any of the usual suspects to have the courage or the ability to respond to my Post #27, a response to Phelia's inquiry.

We got instead the usual personal attacks from those unable to express their meagre thoughts in any other fashion.

For those who watch, this again is evidence that the Left cannot support or defend any of their Utopian dreams of a perfect society if only t hey had complete control of everyone and everything.

It also supports my assertion that the Gauche is without morals, ethics, honor, value or respect for humanity; that they hate true masculinity and femininity, but advocate some brave new world concept of unisex where only the neutered live.

I read somewhere that there is a video of Neci giving head to a horse. Is that true?

Amicus
 
Amicus and the Government Motors billboard. All we need is Ishdork and we'd have a hat trick of grumpy old fools posting on a porn board while waiting to die.
 
...because it is impossible.

Liberals, from your common swamp water Democrats to a hard boiled Marxist, are all, each and every one, 'true believers', with apologies to Etic Hoffer, like Jesus Freaks, they have their faith and nothing with reason, logic or rationality can breach the wall of simpering socialism.

The first reason why one cannot converse with them is that they have no moral foundation. Not only that, but they are proud of it. Even worse, for those with a moral fondation, they hnder and harass anyone who dares claim a moral imperative as a truth. To them, there are no truths, self evident or not.

"We just disagree", not a bad song, but it is the theme song of the left, "There ain't no good guys, there ain't no bad guys...."

No moal foundation, no right or wrong, no good or evil, no black and white....only shades of grey. They can butcher a baby for fuck their brother in the ass and who is to say it is right or wrong?

Any person with morals and ethics; that's who can say it is evil. And explain why.

If they have the courage to confront me at all, they will come whining and claim that they do have a moral system but it depends on where you are in your monthly curse as to whether it is right or wrong; and that it is relative and subjective and everyone has their own code of conduct and none is better than the other.

Truly sad.

So...the first reason you can not and should not talk to a liberal lefty is that they have no honor at all, because they have no values, because values depend upon right and wrong, good and evil. So don't even try to talk with them, not worth the effort and you will get no where.

The second reason....the entire left of the spectrum of political thought 'believe' that the conduct of an indiviudal or a group within a social arena is determined by what is best for the group as a whole.

That is to say that in China, forced abortion is moral, in Britain and Canada, rationing medicine to the old is right and moral because it serves the greater good of the group.

In America is is moral to give an eight year old child a condom without parental consent. For the overall good of society, of course. I mean they are gonna have sex at ten anyway, so why not make it safe sex for the kiddies? Group or social, 'values', determined by the needs of the group or society.

What is wrong with that picture?

Groups have no values, they are mobs. Society is an abstract, it does nol exist in reality. No? Touch it, asshole!

Values, morals, ethics, right and wrong, good and bad are all, and only, defined by the individual with the fundamental value being life itself...individual life.

The Left are cowards; all of them. With no rules of moral conduct, they can never be held responsible for their own actions; they always blame it on social conditions and environments, never themselves.

How can one compromise with these people in order to coexist?

You can not.

They have to go.

Amicus Veritas
Oh, hell's bells.

How many times do I have to tell you that "Amicus Veritas" makes no sense?

Every time you sign a post like that you're saying, "I'm an idiot, so what I say is probably dumb."

Fucking tool.
 
in his dreams.

so amicus, why were you discussing sex with children on a poetry forum?
 
~~~

Personal slander and libel are actionable even should it be written on your dinner napkins, also known as toilet paper

It's good that you have a lawyer then to proofread your derp for legally actionable blood libel.

At least someone is reading your dyspeptic rants, even if you do have to pay him/her to do so.
 
Back
Top