How's this new turn in foriegn policy working out?

They really care about their role of "The Fourth Estate" don't they? Especially when they sit around colluding with each other about the ambush questions they want to ask Romney, but never ask Obama. How they give him a pass on every single fuck up on his long list of fuck ups since being elected. Why aren't they pressing him on his foreign policy fuck ups, Obamacare? They know these subjects will harm in with the public. They are in his pocket, and so are you.

give it up

talking to ZIP et all, is like talking to a rock

:cool:
 
You are full of vetteshit.....

Many of them pay capital gains taxes.

"Many"?

A married couple, taking the standard income tax exemption (this means they don't itemize), do not pay capital gains taxes on the first $88,000 of adjusted gross income.

LINK

According to the Census bureau, 85% of all retiree households earned $75,000 or less in AGI in 2007 (last year available).

LINK

That's not very "many".

Derp.
 
So now we have testimony by US intelligence officials that Benghazi was indeed a terrorist attack and was months in the planning.

Kinda blows that whole 'spontaneous' and 'YouTube' based bullshit right out of the water. And that being the case, we're right back to harvesting the fruits of this administrations foreign policy.

Ishmael

"This administration's foreign policy?"

Really?
 
opps it is now a terrorist attack and not spontantious.....

Come about!!! Man the main sail!!! Prepare to change tack!!! all hands on deck!!!!
 
The administration lied to us from the git-go...



They knew it was a CIA op and that there was a mole.
 
So now we have testimony by US intelligence officials that Benghazi was indeed a terrorist attack and was months in the planning.

Kinda blows that whole 'spontaneous' and 'YouTube' based bullshit right out of the water. And that being the case, we're right back to harvesting the fruits of this administrations foreign policy.

Ishmael

I searched for proof of this, and haven't found any.

Testimony, by the way, is given in court or to judicial officials.
 
Did I not apologize? Unlike you, I can admit an error.

When I do make them, I'll own up to them. You make amazingly glaring errors like this quite often — because you're fed them and it's what you want to hear and the ones feeding you know you won't bother checking up elsewhere — and if you admit the fails (due to someone else pulling your card on it, not from self) it's a grudging admission if you admit them at all.

$500 billion zillion a day trip to India, anyone? :D

I searched for proof of this, and haven't found any.

You gotta admit, it sounded good, though, eh? ;)
 
When I do make them, I'll own up to them. You make amazingly glaring errors like this quite often — because you're fed them and it's what you want to hear and the ones feeding you know you won't bother checking up elsewhere — and if you admit the fails (due to someone else pulling your card on it, not from self) it's a grudging admission if you admit them at all.

$500 billion zillion a day trip to India, anyone? :D



You gotta admit, it sounded good, though, eh? ;)

Sounded credible for a moment, then I realized from where it came.
 
I searched for proof of this, and haven't found any.

Testimony, by the way, is given in court or to judicial officials.

you know what a PEDANTIC SCHMUCK is?


we all saw the TESTIMONY on TV.............

now go quibble with yourself!
 
It's the minutia that shows I'm paying attention, instead of burping and regurgitating Uncle Rush's hate speak

its shows you are a PEDANTIC SCHMUCK

and stop with teh BULL SHIT

HATE SPEAK crap.......:cool:
 
I searched for proof of this, and haven't found any.

Testimony, by the way, is given in court or to judicial officials.

here is more

PEDANTIC SCHMUCK


White House Begins Referring To Attack On Benghazi Embassy As A “Terrorist Attack”…




Now it’s “self-evident” or something.

Via The Hill:


The White House is now referring to an attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi, Egypt as a terrorist attack.

White House press secretary Jay Carney told the White House pool on Air Force One on Thursday that the attack, which occurred about a week earlier and resulted in the death of four American foreign service personnel, was a “terrorist attack.”

“It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack,” Carney said. “Our embassy was attacked violently and the result was four deaths of American officials. So, again, that’s self evident.”
 
here is more

PEDANTIC SCHMUCK


White House Begins Referring To Attack On Benghazi Embassy As A “Terrorist Attack”…




Now it’s “self-evident” or something.

Via The Hill:


The White House is now referring to an attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi, Egypt as a terrorist attack.

White House press secretary Jay Carney told the White House pool on Air Force One on Thursday that the attack, which occurred about a week earlier and resulted in the death of four American foreign service personnel, was a “terrorist attack.”

“It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack,” Carney said. “Our embassy was attacked violently and the result was four deaths of American officials. So, again, that’s self evident.”

Not testimony, but statements.
 
Yes, a TERROR ATTACK!

Not testimony, but statements.

pedantic schmuck:rolleyes:


BTW, PEDANTIC SCHMUCK

The definition of the word is MORE than you assert, PEDANTIC SCHMUCK

World English Dictionary



testimony (ˈtɛstɪmənɪ)







— n , pl -nies



1.

a declaration of truth or fact



2.

law evidence given by a witness, esp orally in court under oath or affirmation



3.

evidence testifying to something: her success was a testimony to her good luck



4.

Old Testament





a.the Ten Commandments, as inscribed on the two stone tables





b.the Ark of the Covenant as the receptacle of these (Exodus 25:16; 16:34)







[C15: from Latin testimōnium, from testis witness]
 
Back
Top