J
JAMESBJOHNSON
Guest
It has been 5 hours, and I have not needed a painkiller or nerve blocker!
I am officially amazed![]()
Its a wonderful intervention! And entirely natural and non-toxic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It has been 5 hours, and I have not needed a painkiller or nerve blocker!
I am officially amazed![]()
Sure. But his stuff was as unscientific as it comes. I don't intend to start shit, b/c what works for someone works.
What a completely strange experience!
Sure. But his stuff was as unscientific as it comes. I don't intend to start shit, b/c what works for someone works.
It has been 5 hours, and I have not needed a painkiller or nerve blocker!
I am officially amazed![]()
Back in the early 70s my math teacher taught me how to construct a rectangle from a square such that the area of the rectangle has more area than the original square. Whats more interesting, if you use a square sheet cake for the demonstration the volume of the rectangle cake is greater than the original square cake, tho the weight of each are equal.
Now! My teacher knew no explanation for how this works, and I remain clueless, but there is more cake than what you start with. The one measures 8x8 inches = 64 square inches, and the other is 5x13 inches = 65 square inches.
Congratulations!
For the first time in 23 years, I have no feeling (perception?) of pain in my back or upper legs!
I'm inclined to agree.
I am not running around clucking like a chicken.
But I am pain-free![]()
Are you sure you're not clucking.
Thats part of it. You don't even know you are clucking.
Are people around you giggling a bit.
If they are you just might be clucking like a chicken:
she lives in a rural area. I bet she is clucking right now.
Maybe she needs the eggs.
Back in the early 70s my math teacher taught me how to construct a rectangle from a square such that the area of the rectangle has more area than the original square. Whats more interesting, if you use a square sheet cake for the demonstration the volume of the rectangle cake is greater than the original square cake, tho the weight of each are equal.
Now! My teacher knew no explanation for how this works, and I remain clueless, but there is more cake than what you start with. The one measures 8x8 inches = 64 square inches, and the other is 5x13 inches = 65 square inches.
Either I'm the biggest dummy in the world, or you're leaving something out.
If you "arrange" 64 one-inch cubes into eight columns of eight rows, you have a single cube of 64 cubic inches.
If you remove three rows to achieve your new height dimension of 5 cubic inches you have physically removed 24 cubic inches (3 x 8), leaving you with a cuboid of 40 cubic inches (5 x 8). When you add those 24 cubic inches back into your new "sheet cake" they will only produce four columns five cubic inches high (4 x 5 = 20) with the final column being only four cubic inches tall, not five!
I believe the mistake you and your teacher made was to use plane geometry calculations to solve a solid geometry problem.
You should have used bricks instead of cake batter.
Your teacher could not explain how it works because it doesn't. He or she should be fired.
If you "arrange" 64 one-inch cubes into eight columns of eight rows, you have a single cube of 64 cubic inches.
If you remove three rows to achieve your new height dimension of 5 cubic inches you have physically removed 24 cubic inches (3 x 8), leaving you with a cuboid of 40 cubic inches (5 x 8). When you add those 24 cubic inches back into your new 5 x 8 "sheet cake" they will only produce four additional columns five cubic inches high (4 x 5 = 20) with the final 13th column being only four cubic inches tall, not five!
I believe the mistake you and your teacher made was to use plane geometry calculations to solve a solid geometry problem.
You should have used bricks instead of cake batter.
I have no idea where the extra inch comes from. The man who showed me the problem taught geometry from 1941 thru 1980 or so. He said he couldnt solve the puzzle. I've toyed with it for 35 years.
I have no idea where the extra inch comes from. The man who showed me the problem taught geometry from 1941 thru 1980 or so. He said he couldnt solve the puzzle. I've toyed with it for 35 years. You can cut a block of wood or whatever, and the extra appears once you re-assemble the pieces.
No. It doesn't.
But as long as we are talking about blocks of wood, perhaps you could loan us your head for conducting your suggested experiment.