Demos Bailing on Obama

Who gives a shit what the hilljacks and their 4 electoral votes think? The best part of West Virginia all emigrated to Ohio, whereupon it became the worst part of Ohio.

That implies one part of Ohio is any better than another part of Ohio. Ohioians should be PROUD one or several of God's people emigrated to the lesser lands and brought with them their gifts and talents.
 
I seldom discuss race here. But when I do I believe it's critical to talk about language. It's a powerful thing. I don't fear talking about words like nigger and neither should you. If people on GB have shamed you for handling that term then you were simply trolled.

I have two social work degrees and mega-hours of classes on race relation, discrimination of all sorts, group psychology, social psychology etc. I'm no stranger to having honest discussions about such things. But that's not what this thread is for. We're supposed to be bashing Obama on the economy... or something.
 
I seldom discuss race here. But when I do I believe it's critical to talk about language. It's a powerful thing. I don't fear talking about words like nigger and neither should you. If people on GB have shamed you for handling that term then you were simply trolled.

I have two social work degrees and mega-hours of classes on race relation, discrimination of all sorts, group psychology, social psychology etc. I'm no stranger to having honest discussions about such things. But that's not what this thread is for. We're supposed to be bashing Obama on the economy... or something.

Who are you talking to?
 
I seldom discuss race here. But when I do I believe it's critical to talk about language. It's a powerful thing. I don't fear talking about words like nigger and neither should you. If people on GB have shamed you for handling that term then you were simply trolled.

I have two social work degrees and mega-hours of classes on race relation, discrimination of all sorts, group psychology, social psychology etc. I'm no stranger to having honest discussions about such things. But that's not what this thread is for. We're supposed to be bashing Obama on the economy... or something.

gee "Lt Col"....all your accomplishments and degrees....WOW

we are impressed























































DUMMY:rolleyes:
 
LIB LOONS.....instead of acknowledging problems with Obama and hoping that he better himself


just attack their OWN


DUMMIEZ:D
 
Whose head, among the august resident commentators on this board, will be the first to explode if Mittens fails to capture the Presidency?
 
None of us expect NIGGER to lose

None of us believe Romney will be ANYTHING but NIGGER lite

None of us believe YOU and YOURS will allow Romney, should a miracle happen, get anything DONE


I know, lets talk WAWA
 
That implies one part of Ohio is any better than another part of Ohio. Ohioians should be PROUD one or several of God's people emigrated to the lesser lands and brought with them their gifts and talents.

And the Ohio meth industry is all the better for it.



Whose head, among the august resident commentators on this board, will be the first to explode if Mittens fails to capture the Presidency?


Oh, when that happens, they will all "remember" Mitt was a RINO all along, and thus the election was not a judgment on them. This is thoroughly predictable.

Here's what I don't get. If all Democrats hate Obama, and all Republicans hate Obama, then the guy ought to be polling down there with the Constitution Party candidate. Instead, he seems to still be leading the national polls. Perhaps someone can explain this paradox to me.
 
Panic sets in at the White House


It’s been a tough couple of weeks for President Obama, one of those stretches where everything seems to go south at once. The economy is soft, his poll numbers are down, and Europe has the markets on edge; Romney is even beating him in the money race. What was once hailed as personal confidence — or condemned as arrogance — is long gone. Panic has set in, and it’s making Team Obama do strange and disturbing things.

In Wisconsin, the result was merely a bit of comic relief. Fearful of making a personal appearance in a losing cause, Obama couldn’t even bring himself to phone it in. Instead, he packed the power of the presidency into a 95-character tweet endorsing Tom Barrett’s challenge to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker. Barrett, a plainspoken former congressman, is far too nice to speak the truth: Thanks for nothing.



Next came a more pronounced gaffe: Obama’s statement at a press conference that “the private sector is doing fine.” Panic can make anyone say crazy things, but blurting out irrational statements isn’t exactly ideal for a president of the United States.

Aides tried desperately to walk things back, but the damage was done precisely because it revealed an element of truth about Obama — that he views the government as the critical source for economic activity in America. That’s why the core of his “jobs” program consists of more infrastructure spending and bailouts for state and local governments.



For months, the White House has been assuming that the economy would be humming by Election Day. Caught flat-footed by the recent slowdown, they have nothing to offer but reheated leftovers from the 2009 stimulus — proposals that not even the Democratic-controlled Senate has passed. Add to that the fact that they will only add to our crushing debt; no Congress will raise taxes in an election year. Memo to the president: The solution to too much debt is not more debt.


Panic-driven responses aren’t just silly or embarrassing; they can be dangerous too. With no good economic news in sight, the White House has embarked on a mission to burnish the president’s national-security credentials. In their desperation to write a compelling narrative for their candidate, Obama’s operatives appear to have disclosed highly classified information.

Washington without leaks would be like watching the Weather Channel for more than 10 minutes: monotonous and repetitive, with very little new information. But exposing national security secrets has always been a sensitive issue for both parties.

When filmmakers were given special access to details of the Bin Laden raid, the protests were mostly Republican. When a Pakistani doctor was imprisoned because his identity was exposed in a New York Times article sourced to administration officials, the concern became bipartisan. The most recent leaks involve highly classified plans to undermine Iran’s nuclear program — and appear to have come directly from the White House. That has most everyone in Congress calling for an investigation.



Unfortunately, America’s chief law enforcement officer has big problems of his own. Attorney General Eric Holder is already facing contempt of Congress charges for failing to turn over documents related to a dubious federal anti-gun-running operation. Now, rather than appointing an independent counsel to investigate the national-security leaks, he’s handed responsibility to two political appointees.

The same Democrats who demanded an independent counsel in the Valerie Plame case during the Bush administration have gone strangely silent.

Grilled last week before a Senate Committee, Holder awkwardly proclaimed, “I heard the White House press officer say yesterday that the president has absolute confidence in me.” The only thing that could have made that statement more damning would be if the president had tweeted it.



None of these mishaps would be telling on its own. Taken together, they expose a White House and a campaign that are adrift, out of momentum, and out of touch. With five months to go, the election could easily go either way. But for Obama, potential downsides loom large, especially as economic forecasts keep getting revised downward.

As Mike Tyson famously observed,
“everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face.”

Then the panic sets in.



http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2012/06/17/sununu/9MkcXV2CD5SQz3fWXlfX9M/story.html
 
another RACIST


It’s not just West Virginia Democrats who are jittery over appearing to be in line with the national Democrats: Mark Critz, a congressman from Pennsylvania, will also not attend this year, reports the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.
 
The Bradley Effect

Read about it



Why President Obama Will Lose in a Landslide





Wayne Allan Root is a former Libertarian Vice-Presidential nominee and a Las Vegas oddsmaker. Root states up front that he won’t vote for either Obama or Romney. Being a Libertarian, his first choice is Ron Paul, but since Paul is not running as a third-party candidate, Root’s going to vote for Libertarian Presidential candidate Gary Johnson. Even so, Root thinks Romney will win in a landslide.

He presents some interesting historical facts that he says point to “a resounding Romney victory.” In 1980, Root points out, “Reagan was losing by 9 points to Carter. Romney is right now running even in polls.” Root offers the following on popular voting blocks to back up his landslide claim:

1. Black voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. His endorsement of gay marriage has alienated many black church-going Christians. He may get 88% of their vote instead of the 96% he got in 2008. This is not good news for Obama.











2. Hispanic voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. If Romney picks Rubio as his VP running-mate the GOP may pick up an extra 10% to 15% of Hispanic voters (plus lock down Florida). This is not good news for Obama. [Editor's Note: Obama’s latest immigration ploy could affect the Hispanic vote. How Romney responds will make a difference.]

3. Jewish voters. Obama has been weak in his support of Israel. Many Jewish voters and big donors are angry and disappointed. I predict Obama’s Jewish support drops from 78% in 2008 to the low 60s. This is not good news for Obama.

4. Youth voters. Obama’s biggest and most enthusiastic believers from 4 years ago have graduated into a job market from hell. Young people are disillusioned, frightened, and broke — a bad combination. The enthusiasm is long gone. Turnout will be much lower among young voters, as will actual voting percentages. This not good news for Obama.

5. Catholic voters. Obama won a majority of Catholics in 2008. That won’t happen again. Out of desperation to please women, Obama went to war with the Catholic Church over contraception. Now he is being sued by the Catholic Church. Majority lost. This is not good news for Obama.

6. Small Business owners. Because I ran for Vice President last time around, and I’m a small businessman myself, I know literally thousands of small business owners. At least 40% of them in my circle of friends, fans and supporters voted for Obama 4 years ago to “give someone different a chance.” I warned them that he would pursue a war on capitalism and demonize anyone who owned a business…that he’d support unions over the private sector in a big way…that he’d overwhelm the economy with spending and debt. My friends didn’t listen. Four years later, I can’t find one person in my circle of small business owner friends voting for Obama. Not one. This is not good news for Obama.

7. Blue collar working class whites. Do I need to say a thing? White working class voters are about as happy with Obama as Boston Red Sox fans feel about the New York Yankees. This is not good news for Obama.

8. Suburban moms. The issue isn’t contraception; it’s having a job to pay for contraception. Obama’s economy frightens these moms. They are worried about putting food on the table. They fear for their children’s future. This is not good news for Obama.

9. Military Veterans. McCain won this group by 10 points. Romney is winning by 24 points. The more our military vets got to see of Obama, the more they disliked him. This is not good news for Obama.

Add it up. Is there one major group where Obama has gained since 2008? Will anyone in America wake up on election-day saying “I didn’t vote for Obama 4 years ago, but he’s done such a fantastic job. I can’t wait to vote for him today”? Does anyone feel that a vote for Obama makes their job more secure?

Forget the polls. My gut instincts as a Vegas oddsmaker and common sense small businessman tell me this will be a historic landslide and a world-class repudiation of Obama’s radical and risky socialist agenda. It’s Reagan-Carter all over again.

But I’ll give Obama credit for one thing — he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.


Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/5763/why-president-obama-will-lose-landslide/#ixzz1yMQ0TtSi
 
Eventually

Some will admit

That Obama is a cancer and not all those that avoid him are RACIST

Eventually

HOPEY-CHANGEY: Ga. Democrats can’t move tickets to Obama reception?



The Georgia Democratic Party’s fifty percent reduction in ticket costs for a reception next week in which Georgians can press the flesh with Barack Obama has prompted some Republicans to ask if the president’s fundraising operation is slowing.

A joint fundraising effort by the state party and the presidential reelect effort, the Atlanta reception was originally pushing three graduated ticket offerings: $10,000 to earn co-host billing, $1,000 for a sponsorship, and $500 for general admission.

But the state party emailed donors on Wednesday to say a new tier had been created for young professionals. This Gen44 offering, said to have limited availability, would run donors only $250 — half the original value of general admission chit.


Hmm.
 
The Abandon Ship List grows...

Another Dem. Congressman Refuses to Endorse Obama

President Obama's reelection problems continue in North Carolina, the state that's hosting this year's Democratic National Committee convention later this year. Congressman Mike McIntyre, a Democratic representative of North Carolina's Seventh Congressional District, is now refusing to endorse President Obama.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/another-dem-congressman-refuses-endorse-obama_647812.html
 
Missouri Senator McCaskill latest to bail on Obama...

Sen. McCaskill joins list of Democrats skipping national convention

http://www.latimes.com/news/politic...g-national-convention-20120626,0,846948.story

McCaskill was a key player for Obama in 2008; besides almost delivering the state of Missouri for him, she also addressed the National Convention last time, speaking just before Mrs. Obama.

”You can’t underestimate the importance of Claire McCaskill to this campaign,” senior Obama campaign adviser Anita Dunn said [during the 2008 campaign].

~

Obama narrowly lost Missouri in 2008– but by a margin of less than one percentage point– making it one of the closest states in the general election.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...partys-national-convention-continues-to-grow/

Unfortunately for the incumbent Statist-in-Chief, Mules approval rate him at just 39% and the state is solidly lined-up in the Republican camp this time.

Of course, McCaskill herself faces reelection this November - polls have her at best tied with her challengers, some putting her even 8 pts behind.
 
Back
Top