Are Liberals the New Squares?

4est_4est_Gump

Run Forrest! RUN!
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Posts
89,007
By Roger L Simon

This title of this article is tendentious because, in truth, I already know that liberals are the new squares. Not only that – they’re terminally out of it.

But first, let’s roll back. Some time ago, for these web pages, I wrote of the Death (not the Birth) of the Cool [1]. This was picked up and amplified recently, and graciously, by Ed Driscoll [2]. As men of “a certain age,” as the saying goes, Ed and I remember Miles and Thelonious [3] – the days when cool was cool and pot was a reefer.

Those days are not only gone, they’ve faded so far in the rear view mirror that not even the slightest ghost remains, only some imaginary version of an imaginary version. Cool is dead and now liberalism is the squarest of the square.

I mean – do you think Deborah Wasserman-Schultz is hip? This is one of the meanest things I’ve ever put in print or online, but that’s the girl who was standing in the corner at the sixth grade cotillion and you said, “Oh, no. Do I have to dance with her?”

And how about the great Obama himself – he and his “choom” friends [4] twenty years too late to the party, replaying Bob Dylan and company in Hawaii long after the Band burned old Dixie down. It’s all a bad chapter from David Brooks’ already-predictable-whe- published Bobos in Paradise [5]. The minute rebellion goes middle class, there’s nothing less rebellious. It’s all as boring as a Volvo.

So we are in an era of desperation. A certain class of people who staked their lives on being cool ever since high school — whenever that was, the sixties, the seventies, the eighties, who knows — are beginning to be confronted with the truth – that their ultra-conventional received wisdom, that which they thought was cool, is a bunch of hooey. (I was one of them [6], so I know.)

Of course, most can’t countenance this. They continue to believe that government spending is cool, that it is a good thing (how square is that?), but out of the corner of their ears they are beginning to hear a different song:

Libertarians are the cool guys.

Libertarians?

What does that mean?

Oh, yes, that’s a word for conservatives who wanted to get girls at parties.

Well, it probably was. But times have changed on that too and nearly everyone with half a brain is kind of a libertarian now, at least partly. The rest, like Paul Krugman [7], are out of it.

The Washington Post, the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times are squaresville. Even the Village Voice is squaresville. If the East Village Other (remember that?) still existed, it would be terminally square. The Village itself is square – now just another shopping mall.

I guess it’s to be expected – that the cool grew up to be square. Hell, even evangelicals are hipper than liberals now. (I used the word Hell deliberately, even though it isn’t cool.)

Now here’s the thing: Liberals are beginning to realize they’re not hip anymore. They won’t admit it, but they do. Witness Obama’s behavior with the press. He’s sweating like Nixon – and that’s definitely not hip. (On second thought, Nixon was finally hipper than Obama.)

And Jay Carney? Would you call him hip? And what about Biden? Has there ever been a soul so square?

What makes modern liberalism the mess that it is today is that it is mainly composed of people who desperately wanted to be cool in high school – wanted to be Abbie Hoffman or Eldridge Cleaver – but never were. Their longing – this need to be Abbie – has clouded their thinking and their ability to perceive reality, placing us all in a mess along with them.

Meanwhile, Bob Dylan became a conservative [8].
http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2012/06/19/are-liberals-the-new-squares/?singlepage=true

▢ ▢ ▢ ▢ ▢ ▢
 
Just a minute ago the right was accusing Obama of being too cool. Now he's too square. I guess he's both at the same time.

And this makes sense in Republican-land, just like how Obama is a Muslim and a radical Christian at the same time.
 
Just a minute ago the right was accusing Obama of being too cool. Now he's too square. I guess he's both at the same time.

And this makes sense in Republican-land, just like how Obama is a Muslim and a radical Christian at the same time.

Cool as defined by the Left has now become square.


Obama is very cool, but it is a quaint, old-fashioned cool that might have died with Bill Clinton.
 
Originally Posted by mercury14 View Post
Just a minute ago the right was accusing Obama of being too cool. Now he's too square. I guess he's both at the same time.

And this makes sense in Republican-land, just like how Obama is a Muslim and a radical Christian at the same time


You have a real talent for saying stupid things that have no basis in fact.
 
COOL=RACIST



I know

The national association of COLORED (so called alleged) "people" said so

Hey I know

Bush dragged Byrd to his death:cool:
 
Originally Posted by mercury14 View Post
Just a minute ago the right was accusing Obama of being too cool. Now he's too square. I guess he's both at the same time.

And this makes sense in Republican-land, just like how Obama is a Muslim and a radical Christian at the same time


You have a real talent for saying stupid things that have no basis in fact.

COOL=RACIST



I know

The national association of COLORED (so called alleged) "people" said so

Hey I know

Bush dragged Byrd to his death:cool:

The big problem is, they won't fit in the round hole of freedom.

What has probably turned the tide are the economics of cool...


;) ;)
 
Liberals are the people who buy tickets to Heaven and Peruna Natural Elixir.

Libertarians are the people who attach chains to their wallets and grow pot out behind the crapper.

And Conservatives load 16 tons, get older and deeper in debt.
 
Originally Posted by mercury14 View Post
Just a minute ago the right was accusing Obama of being too cool. Now he's too square. I guess he's both at the same time.

And this makes sense in Republican-land, just like how Obama is a Muslim and a radical Christian at the same time


You have a real talent for saying stupid things that have no basis in fact.

You routinely quote the posts of people you have on ignore.
You really have some serious issues, Miles Ben Zonah.
 
That was a pretty uncool op ed.

Cool people don't yap about their own coolness. They act cool, and that's that.

Doing the blog equivalence of jumping up and down and squeaking "hey hey hey look at me I'm cool now yes I am and hey hey hey look at them they're square haha they're so square" is, well, quite the opposite.
 
Cool as defined by the Left has now become square.


Obama is very cool, but it is a quaint, old-fashioned cool that might have died with Bill Clinton.

It's too funny how an opinion piece by anyone online that matches how you want the world to be is instantly transformed into a new reality.
 
So if we're just talking about cool people and squares and such, I offer this question. Would you really 'hang out', "party" or "chill" with Sean Hannity, Mitt Romney, Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Rick Santorum or Sarah Palin?
 
Hannity is supposedly a pretty effable guy when hes not a whargarbling shill on TV. He just transmogifies into a derp twerp in front of a camera.
 
I'd go hunting with Sarah...



No one said Conservatives are cool. If fact, I said Obama was cool.

What is being said is that they're now squares.

Conservatives who want no change.

Hoping for 1968...

;) ;)
 
Back
Top