yet another attempt at internet censorship

Stella_Omega

No Gentleman
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Posts
39,700
Tell Obama And Dodd: No Backroom Dealing, No New SOPA

Dear Stella:

They still just don't get it. Chris Dodd -- the head of the Hollywood Lobby -- is bragging that he's working on a new insider deal to push through SOPA-like legislation.

He had this exchange with the Hollywood Reporter this week:

THR: Are there conversations going on now?

Dodd: I'm confident that's the case, but I'm not going to go into more detail because obviously if I do, it becomes counterproductive.

THR: Did you feel personally blindsided by Obama over SOPA?

Dodd: I'm not going to revisit the events of last winter. I'll only say to you that I'm confident he's using his good relationships in both communities to do exactly what you and I have been talking about.

Hollywood and Obama should've learned: No form of censorship will be acceptable to Internet users, and we're fed up with corrupt, back-room deals that are driven by the rich and well-connected.

Any major Internet policy changes should be negotiated in the light of day,so the millions of people who'd be affected can have their say too.


Please tell President Obama to reject Hollywood's backroom deals -- just add your name.
(We'll send the White House an email with the petition text.)

You can read Techdirt's take on the revelations over here.
 
Last edited:
Done.

Not sure how much support can be gained from here though. As the paypal debacle(which directly affected authors) showed, there's more talkers than doer's here.
 
Done.

Not sure how much support can be gained from here though. As the paypal debacle(which directly affected authors) showed, there's more talkers than doer's here.

Ever consider people may fill out petitions and just not talk about it? Geez.

Done.
 
Last edited:
Signed
I count in this apparently underhanded nonsense, even if I ain't in the USA.

But I'd be most interested to know just how an imposition of [some sort of] censorship would apply to the rest of the known world.
 
Last edited:
I question what exactly we are being asked to sign up for? What exact legislation is to be opposed?

Personally I think that Internet pirates should pay for the content they steal and pay the royalties they have evaded.

I don't see why ISP's should be treated differently to any other publisher.

Once those safeguards are in place there should be no further censorship and no material excluded that would not already be excluded by existing laws.

Clearly the original Sopa went ridiculously over the top but some regulation is going to happen.
 
I question what exactly we are being asked to sign up for? What exact legislation is to be opposed?
...
Clearly the original Sopa went ridiculously over the top but some regulation is going to happen.
We are asking that any legislation concerning internet piracy prevention not be done in closed rooms, and NOT be authored by a corporation which has already tried to create legislation antithetic to public freedoms of speech.
 
We are asking that any legislation concerning internet piracy prevention not be done in closed rooms, and NOT be authored by a corporation which has already tried to create legislation antithetic to public freedoms of speech.

Thank you for the clarification.
 
Back
Top