garbage can
North by Northeast
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2005
- Posts
- 57,302
Slander has never been considered freedom of speech.
But wait a sec.
I thought when Maher called Palin a cunt, it was freedom of speech
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Slander has never been considered freedom of speech.
The mind reels at the spinning going on in the thread.
I looked up this little hissy fit that people are having and most of the articles address your point. They say Obama should disassociate from them until they give the money back themselves or they are asking the superPAC directly to give it back.
Far as I saw they all concede that Obama can't give it back himself.
You may be of the opinion that it is "corporate welfare". But the FCC doesn't look at it that way.
You might want to take a look at this.
But wait a sec.
I thought when Maher called Palin a cunt, it was freedom of speech
And nobody gives a fuck about Limbaugh 'cept all you assholes on the left.
I think vetteman wants to start a campaign to boycott all of Bill Maher's sponsors. Too bad he has none.
1. Palin is a public figure.
2. The comment was not made on the public airwaves subsidized by tax payers.
3. Palin is a cunt.
Hey Phro, talking about boycotts, and I'm talking radio, do you recall the Republicans boycotting (or trying to boycott) any progressive liberal radio station..?.. ever....?...... I'm talking like... Doctor Laura, when they tried to get her off the air.
When did Maher call Palin a slut?
Most fundamentally, why the impulse to counter one outrageous stunt by rummaging through the archives in search of some supposedly offsetting outrageous stunt? Why not respond to an indecent act on its own terms, and then -- if there's another indecency later -- react to that too, and on its own terms?
Instead, public life is reduced to a revenge drama. Each offense is condoned by reference to some previous offense by some undefined "them" who supposedly once did something even worse, or anyway nearly as bad, at some point in the past.
Time to crank it down, RDS.
1. Palin is a public figure.
2. The comment was not made on the public airwaves subsidized by tax payers.
3. Palin is a cunt.
1. Of course, I forgot, it's okay to call a public figure a cunt.
You figure Michelle Obama is a cunt?
2. Of course, I forgot again, it's okay if Maher calls Palin a cunt on HBO.
3. Drixxy, your mind is fucked up.
1. Of course, I forgot, it's okay to call a public figure a cunt.
You figure Michelle Obama is a cunt?
2. Of course, I forgot again, it's okay if Maher calls Palin a cunt on HBO.
3. Drixxy, your mind is fucked up.
1. Of course, I forgot, it's okay to call a public figure a cunt.
You figure Michelle Obama is a cunt?
2. Of course, I forgot again, it's okay if Maher calls Palin a cunt on HBO.
3. Drixxy, your mind is fucked up.
Im not "ok" with it, however she is a public figure and what kind of country would we be if we weren't allowed to criticize/make fun of, our leaders?
I'm actually not really sure why there is so much outrage for Rush's statement, hes said lots of really horrible things before, thats his thing. He wants people talking about him so he goes out of his way to be outrageous. However, unlike Maher, Rush cant hide behind the title of "comedian".
Reallly good recap HERE.
That op-ed also discusses how whiny Republicans are playin' the victim card because Bill Maher went after poor defenseless Sarah Palin
Edited to add...THE MONEY QUOTE!
Obama cannot associate nor disassociate with them.
So two wrongs make a right? Is that what your birthmother instilled in you? Hmmm?
That doesn't actually answer my question. I want to know when and what specifically Maher said. Was it on his Friday Night show or was it part of his stand up routine or one of his movies. There is actually a difference.
*laughing*...... Uhhh, RDS, your cliché is about as dumb as.... "We want them to pay their fair share"... or how about this one, it goes back several decades.. "The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer".
Or a newer one..."Change we can believe in".....Yup "Hope and change"......![]()
Of course he can. All he'd have to do is publicly say so. That's what some of them are asking for. He can't control what they do with the money but he can say he doesn't agree with it.
Why don't you say what you mean instead of "hmmmmmmmm".
You are totally incapable of expressing a complete thought.
But liberals give a shit about everything Rush says because they know it's true.![]()