Republican piss me off

[Very_Bad_Man]

WTF is wrong with these fucking people.

They are now against birth control and Va wants to pass this fucked up abortion bill. this abortion bill forces doctors to do an ultra sound in a veiled attempt to guilt the mother into not aborting. they are shameless.

Under the Republican view we will soon be plagued with unwanted children. spreading STD"s at an alarming rate due to no condoms. Oh yeah they expect people not married to abstain from sex . with their plan to outlaw abortion women will soon find themselves bleeding to death from their visit to the back alley midwife armed with a coat hanger.

Hey republicans take your religious dogma and shove it up your midevil close minded rectums.

 

[busybody..]

we need MORE coloreds around

so the PAROLE OFFICERS and CORRECTIONS OFFICERS will always have work

whats so hard to get?

 

[JohnnySavage]

Seems like men should be required to have a prostate exam prior to receiving a Viagra prescription. Fair is fair.

 

[KRCummings]

Seems like men should be required to have a prostate exam prior to receiving a Viagra prescription. Fair is fair.

You just like having your ass fingered.

 

[richard_daily]

Seems like men should be required to have a prostate exam prior to receiving a Viagra prescription. Fair is fair.

You're turning busybody on.

 

[JohnnySavage]

You just like having your ass fingered.

Who doesn't?

 

[KRCummings]

Who doesn't?

Yeah, good point.

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

Who doesn't?

not me.

exit only

 

[JohnnySavage]

not me.

exit only

Nobody believes that.

 

[mercury14]

Laws requiring TSA pat-downs over clothing? That's clearly a government overreach and a violation of privacy and an outrageous violation of personal freedom.

Laws requiring a seven-inch camera to be inserted into a woman's vagina and forcing her to hear something she chooses not to hear? Well that's no violation at all! Republicans say it's perfectly within the rights of government to vaginally explore its' women. And if the law violates medical ethics? Doesn't matter, the Republican Party platform is more important than ethics.

This is the Republican vision of small government ladies and gentlemen.

 

[mercury14]

In case anyone has not seen vaginal ultrasound wands, they're a little bit thinner than a cucumber. It then has to be inserted into the vagina five to seven inches, filling it completely. The doc then locates the woman's cervix and presses up against it, which most women find uncomfortable.

The Republican Party says that it's the government's right to mandate this procedure for whoever it wants. If they can mandate such a thing prior to a perfectly legal abortion it's also in their power to require one prior to taking out a bank loan.

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

Laws requiring TSA pat-downs over clothing? That's clearly a government overreach and a violation of privacy and an outrageous violation of personal freedom.

Laws requiring a seven-inch camera to be inserted into a woman's vagina and forcing her to hear something she chooses not to hear? Well that's no violation at all! Republicans say it's perfectly within the rights of government to vaginally explore its' women. And if the law violates medical ethics? Doesn't matter, the Republican Party platform is more important than ethics.

This is the Republican vision of small government ladies and gentlemen.

TSA pat downs is not a violation of anybodies rights. Flying is private enterprise and if you choose to fly you abide by their stipulations. The real problem with the TSA is employing people with no true aptitude for the job who cannot apply common sense to the job. Example: seizing a child's cupcakes because the icing by definition is a gel type substance that could be explosives. These types of ridiculous actions are what make the TSA offensive.

 

[mercury14]

TSA pat downs is not a violation of anybodies rights. Flying is private enterprise and if you choose to fly you abide by their stipulations. The real problem with the TSA is employing people with no true aptitude for the job who cannot apply common sense to the job. Example: seizing a child's cupcakes because the icing by definition is a gel type substance that could be explosives. These types of ridiculous actions are what make the TSA offensive.

Not disagreeing.

 

[Liar]

Laws requiring TSA pat-downs over clothing? That's clearly a government overreach and a violation of privacy and an outrageous violation of personal freedom.

Laws requiring a seven-inch camera to be inserted into a woman's vagina and forcing her to hear something she chooses not to hear? Well that's no violation at all! Republicans say it's perfectly within the rights of government to vaginally explore its' women. And if the law violates medical ethics? Doesn't matter, the Republican Party platform is more important than ethics.

This is the Republican vision of small government ladies and gentlemen.

Virginia has right of conscience law.

I can't wait for a doctor with a spine to use that to refuse doing this nonsense.

 

[Sean Renaud]

TSA pat downs is not a violation of anybodies rights. Flying is private enterprise and if you choose to fly you abide by their stipulations. The real problem with the TSA is employing people with no true aptitude for the job who cannot apply common sense to the job. Example: seizing a child's cupcakes because the icing by definition is a gel type substance that could be explosives. These types of ridiculous actions are what make the TSA offensive.

Except the TSA isn't a private company. It's government. So you're not abiding by their stipulations it's a government thing. I agree with you in spirit but your facts are wrong.

Also if letting a child through with cupcakes is allowed then terrorists will find away to make C4 cupcakes. Honestly we deal with so little terrorism in this country that only cowards and those who've been personally hurt and they're too close to the problem to be rational.

 

[unregistered]

 

[JoeRockStar]

TSA pat downs is not a violation of anybodies rights.

After your original rant about "rights", seeing you post this confirms you're a colossal idiot.

 

[subwannabe]

First off, you are making the same mistake that Left Wing Liberals and Right Wing Conservatives both do. The Republican party is made up of a lot of different people with different values. Right Wing nuts are a part of the Republican party, they do not represent the entire party. Same thing is true of the Left Wing nuts. They do not represent the entire Democratic Party. Most Republicans and Democrats aren't actually extreme and don't toe the line on extreme positions (like the ones you quoted). Case in point, John McCain was elected as the Republican nominee in the last presidential election even though he was despised by the Right Wing nuts. That is one reason though that he picked Sarah Palin as his running mate, to try appeasing the Right Wing Nuts. But, the fact that McCain did win the nomination proves that most "Republicans" are not the Right Wing Nuts that you describe or they would have nominated one of their own.

 

[Sean Renaud]

First off, you are making the same mistake that Left Wing Liberals and Right Wing Conservatives both do. The Republican party is made up of a lot of different people with different values. Right Wing nuts are a part of the Republican party, they do not represent the entire party. Same thing is true of the Left Wing nuts. They do not represent the entire Democratic Party. Most Republicans and Democrats aren't actually extreme and don't toe the line on extreme positions (like the ones you quoted). Case in point, John McCain was elected as the nominee in the last presidential election even though he was despised by the Right Wing nuts. That is one reason though that he picked Sarah Palin as his running mate, to try appeasing the Right Wing Nuts. But, the fact that McCain did win the nomination proves that most "Republicans" are not the Right Wing Nuts that you describe.

No. The Republicans are a tight knit enough group that we can look at the front runners (even if you go back to when there were a dozen of them) and make a statement about Republicans as a whole. Show me the front running democrat who's a radical atheist or a radical tree hugger or a radical commie. They don't actually exist. But Hermain Cain and Newt Gingrich are both real. Michelle Bachmann and Rick Santorum are both real.

McCain did win and Romney will likely win but that doesn't change the fact that the field is filled with crazy that you don't see an equivalent from on the Left.

 

[TexasWife25]

No. The Republicans are a tight knit enough group that we can look at the front runners (even if you go back to when there were a dozen of them) and make a statement about Republicans as a whole. Show me the front running democrat who's a radical atheist or a radical tree hugger or a radical commie. They don't actually exist. But Hermain Cain and Newt Gingrich are both real. Michelle Bachmann and Rick Santorum are both real.

McCain did win and Romney will likely win but that doesn't change the fact that the field is filled with crazy that you don't see an equivalent from on the Left.

^^^ this

 

[busybody..]

opps


Study: 99% Of Abortion Clinics Perform Ultrasounds Prior To Performing An Abortion…




But hey, why let facts get in the way of a good scare campaign?

Via Weekly Standard:


Liberals and the mainstream media have been denouncing a proposed ultrasound law in Virginia as akin to rape (Jon Stewart and Meghan McCain joined in the demagoguery last night). “[T]he law provides that women seeking an abortion in Virginia will be forcibly penetrated for no medical reason,” wrote Slate’s Dahlia Lithwick. But as Alana Goodman reported yesterday, Planned Parenthood clinics already require ultrasounds prior to performing surgical and drug-induced abortions. Today, Steven Ertelt reports on a 2003 study that found 99% of abortion clinics perform an ultrasound prior to performing an abortion. If there is “no medical reason” for these ultrasounds, as Lithwick and friends contend, then why are Planned Parenthood and other abortionists requiring them

 

[subwannabe]

There is a difference between who the voters are and who is running. McCain won because he was moderate and was elected by Republican "moderates". You are correct that most of the Republican candidates are Right Wing wackos but it is the voters who are the true Republican party, not the candidates and McCain won because most Republican voters are right of center but not Right Wing Nuts. Ditto Romney. I refer to "Republicans" as the voters, not the candidates.

 

[Peregrinator]

take your religious dogma and shove it up your midevil close minded rectums.

God baiter.

 

[exposingsecrets]

Seems like men should be required to have a prostate exam prior to receiving a Viagra prescription. Fair is fair.

I had heard you liked things poked around up there but have yet to uncover that in proof. I am going to keep poking around though. Lots of sources so I am sure something will "pop up".

 

[exposingsecrets]

not me.

exit only

VBM someone has been fibbing about their polished military record. Ever wonder who all has access to DD214's? I don't have to wonder because I know. There are a few other things I know as well. Want to come clean before show and tell day around here be my guest. If you get even close to the truth I will not have to get all the way to the truth.