Woman Dumps Boyfriend With Cancer But Still Wants His Super Bowl Tickets

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/trendin...-cancer-still-wants-super-bowl-171734088.html

Still looking for Super Bowl tickets? You may be in luck, but you're going to have to work for them. Jason Elia told ESPN 97.5 in Houston that he is giving his tickets to the person who gets him the most Twitter followers. Elia, a television writer who lives in Nashville, spent $8,000 on two tickets to Super Bowl XLVI in Indianapolis at Lucas Oil Stadium. He was going to take his football-loving girlfriend to the big game, but his plan went kaput. On November 7, he found out he had bladder cancer. When he told his girlfriend, she dumped him. In an interview with Trending Now, Elia said his girlfriend "could not handle the stress of having a boyfriend with cancer." To make matters worse, Elia was planning to propose to her on Christmas. Perhaps the cruelest twist of fate is that his ex-girlfriend still wanted the Super Bowl tickets. According to Elia, his ex-girlfriend says the tickets are rightfully hers because he bought them with her in mind. Well not only is Elia not giving her the tickets, he also held a contest to get rid of them.
 
I honestly think that legally she should get them. He bought them as a gift for her. She left him because he had cancer and she told him she wouldn't be able to support him and didn't want to be a bitch by pretending. Harsh, but true. I'd be pissed- and I would have sold them. But I think, legally, she gets them. But, if she takes it to court, the morality of the case is going to be taken into account, even though it isn't supposed to. "Cancer" is a buzzword. The jury hears that and she's hung. She should let it go. And he should count himself lucky that he dodged a bullet.
 
so ..Newt doing this...twice... is also "patriarchal oppression"?...or does it not count because he has a penis?

I know I'm not the only one asking this, but how the fuck is that man getting laid that consistently. He must give out platinum cards like candy. Because it's not his fucking looks.
 
so ..Newt doing this...twice... is also "patriarchal oppression"?...or does it not count because he has a penis?
Actually I and millions of others call this woman's move a NEWT GINGRICH move. I was protesting the way he dumped his cancer-stricken wife back when I was a Republican. Back then I didn't even know he dumped another wife for another illness as well.

In fact, I believe 'Gingrich' is now a popular slang term listed to describe someone who forgets the whole "in sickness and in health" thing.
 
I honestly think that legally she should get them. He bought them as a gift for her. She left him because he had cancer and she told him she wouldn't be able to support him and didn't want to be a bitch by pretending. Harsh, but true. I'd be pissed- and I would have sold them. But I think, legally, she gets them. But, if she takes it to court, the morality of the case is going to be taken into account, even though it isn't supposed to. "Cancer" is a buzzword. The jury hears that and she's hung. She should let it go. And he should count himself lucky that he dodged a bullet.
I hope she loses. I hope someone puts a bullet in her head and angry feminists around the world bitch and cry about it. If she gets hit by a bus I will buy a get well card for the bus.
 
I hope she loses. I hope someone puts a bullet in her head and angry feminists around the world bitch and cry about it. If she gets hit by a bus I will buy a get well card for the bus.


and yet you wonder why people call you a misogynist
 
well considering that he still holds the tickets. He bought them with the two of them in mind, going to the game together. He never handed the ticket over to her as a gift. Therefore I don't think she has a leg to stand on. Anyway you look at it, its going to cost her more then $4,000 dollars to fight it in court, if she wanted to.

I think they are his to do what he wishes with them. If it had been a gift for her, he would have given her the ticket. There are so many ways this can go.

I was just thinking if she really wants the ticket, then why doesn't she win the contest.
 
and yet you wonder why people call you a misogynist
It's no different than Sharon Osborne laughing and making jokes about a man being castrated.

Well, actually it is different. I'm male. It's only bigotry when males laugh at shit like that. :rolleyes:
 
It's no different than Sharon Osborne laughing and making jokes about a man being castrated.

Well, actually it is different. I'm male. It's only bigotry when males laugh at shit like that. :rolleyes:

actually..it's very different.. everyone who says it makes it different

what makes it different in this case is that Sharon said it once


if you had said it once....we could attribute it to you being an idiot like her... but you didnt stop at once.. you go on and on about what you would like to say or do to women.......when it's repeated enough, it becomes a telling feature about how you feel about women
 
actually..it's very different.. everyone who says it makes it different

what makes it different in this case is that Sharon said it once
And when challenged on it and had to apologize, she laughed out loud about the incident as if she had nothing but contempt for people who were offended by it.

So by your logic if you call someone a nasty hooknosed jew and then laugh at the audience while choking out something that could only be called an apology by the biggest stretch of the imagination... that makes you not an anti-Semite. Gotcha.

if you had said it once....we could attribute it to you being an idiot like her... but you didnt stop at once.. you go on and on about what you would like to say or do to women.......when it's repeated enough, it becomes a telling feature about how you feel about women
I'd love nothing better than to see women knocked down from their arrogant, self-righteous perch to realize they're flawed just like the rest of us mortals, and they don't deserve any more gender privileges than anyone else.

Only when the last gold digger, male basher and damsel in distress is bred out of the gene pool will guys like me stop coming along.
 
And when challenged on it and had to apologize, she laughed out loud about the incident as if she had nothing but contempt for people who were offended by it.

So by your logic if you call someone a nasty hooknosed jew and then laugh at the audience while choking out something that could only be called an apology by the biggest stretch of the imagination... that makes you not an anti-Semite. Gotcha.


I'd love nothing better than to see women knocked down from their arrogant, self-righteous perch
to realize they're flawed just like the rest of us mortals, and they don't deserve any more gender privileges than anyone else.

Only when the last gold digger, male basher and damsel in distress is bred out of the gene pool
will guys like me stop coming along.

has she continued to make these comments? that's another difference between you and her.. she has stopped.. you have not

and as for the racist screed.. that's false equivalency.... because if we even take it to that extreme.. you have continued your telling commentary about women.. just because you haven't apologized..doesn't make you less of a misogynist.......nice attempt at deflection though
 
I honestly think that legally she should get them. He bought them as a gift for her. She left him because he had cancer and she told him she wouldn't be able to support him and didn't want to be a bitch by pretending. Harsh, but true. I'd be pissed- and I would have sold them. But I think, legally, she gets them. But, if she takes it to court, the morality of the case is going to be taken into account, even though it isn't supposed to. "Cancer" is a buzzword. The jury hears that and she's hung. She should let it go. And he should count himself lucky that he dodged a bullet.

I think you can apply the same case law as an engagement ring. Legally the ring is a promise to get married and does not become the womans till that contract is complete.

He bough the tickets for his girlfriend. As she is no longer his girlfriend, she can no longer claim the tickets.

She would lose regardless of the morality of the case.
 
I think you can apply the same case law as an engagement ring. Legally the ring is a promise to get married and does not become the womans till that contract is complete.

He bough the tickets for his girlfriend. As she is no longer his girlfriend, she can no longer claim the tickets.

She would lose regardless of the morality of the case.

except...she was never his girlfriend it seems

unless you consider Jodi Foster to be the girlfriend of john Hinckley
 
except...she was never his girlfriend it seems

unless you consider Jodi Foster to be the girlfriend of john Hinckley
Well, we don't know that either. Looks like a he said she said thing.

All we know is that he's a drama queen who tells his sob story to anyone who wants to hear, and hangs hot her name in public. That's not the big man thing to do whatever sort of bitch she is.
 
Back
Top