Dick Morris Says, "Democrats Are Tanking"

[unregistered]

 

[Frizzle_Fry]

Big shocker...

 

[islandman]

Very insightful analysis.

In that same vein, I'm having a half-sandwich and soup combo for lunch.

 

[JohnnySavage]

Very insightful analysis.

In that same vein, I'm having a half-sandwich and soup combo for lunch.

What'd you do with the other half of the sandwich?

 

[islandman]

What'd you do with the other half of the sandwich?

I sent it to Dick Morris COD.

 

[unregistered]

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Blt W/koolaid

 

[JohnnySavage]

I walked over and talked to the boys at the construction site across the street. I really wish I had brought my black lunch box with me.

 

[Karen Kraft]

They've lost 21% of their supporters since Obama was elected. Check this out:

http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/democrats-are-tanking-dick-morris-tv-lunch-alert/

Don't kid yourself.

The inner city ballot-stuffers, the union thugs, and the public employees will storm out aplenty on election day. You can lose 20% of your base if 10% of the loyal vote eight times each.

 

[Disgustipated]

I haven't decided on lunch yet. I might intercept IM's COD to Dicky.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Take it with a grain of salt....

Dick Morris has made quite a comfortable career for himself by routinely predictin' Doom! 'n Gloom! on the Democratic party.

 

[KingOrfeo]

The inner city ballot-stuffers . . .

You can't be that ignorant any more, so you must be a liar.

 

[Wrong Element]

Hmmm. Didn't Vetteman talk up another provocative Dick Morris comment recently? Yes, I believe he did...wonder how that one turned out?

Personally, I don't think the Obama ego is capable of facing any such reality were it to become true:


Fmr. Clinton Adviser: 'Very Possible' Obama Will Bow Out of Presidential Race - For Now


In an interview with conservative radio icon Sean Hannity, former President Clinton adviser and campaign manager Dick Morris stated that, after speaking with a Democratic strategist, he thinks it is “very possible” that President Obama might acquiesce to requests from the Democratic leadership in Congress and bow out of the 2012 race, leaving the door open for him to return sometime in the future.

“I asked a top Democratic strategist the other day and he thought that it was possible that, in January, Harry Reid comes to Obama and says, ‘Look you cost us control of the House last year, you’re going to cost us control of the Senate this year. For the good of the party you have to step aside’” said Morris.

“And, then, (Obama) pulls a Lyndon Johnson, he says ‘I’m fighting to solve the recession, and problem is because of partisanship and my re-election people reject everything I say because of partisanship, so I’m going to not run for president and focus my full time attention on solving this recession’ and then go out popular,” Morris added.

The strategy proposed here is an interesting one. With his approval ratings at an all time low, Obama is looking at a very high likelihood of a defeat in the 2012 elections and forecasters, using the examples of the 2011 special elections in New York City and Nevada, have forecast a very high probability of losses across the nation for the Democratic Party because of Obama.

A withdrawal by President Obama, with a statement that the reason he’s bowing out is to solve the recession, would likely allow the Democratic Party to recover some of its popularity and allow the president to present himself as rising above the partisan fights in Congress with a higher goal in mind. This would help the Democrats to better portray the Republicans, and especially the Tea Party, as the stubborn, non-compromising party uninterested in truly solving the nation’s problems.

Morris added that he thinks that this strategy could also set up Obama for a presidential run in a later election.

“The twenty second amendment does not preclude non-consecutive terms, he is young, (he could) preserve himself as a possible candidate down the road” said Morris. “We’ve seen how Bill Clinton is much more popular now then he was when he was leaving office, same with Jimmy Carter.”

Intriguing as that possibility is, however, non-consecutive presidential terms have only happened once before in American politics, though they have been attempted by a few former presidents. The only president to successfully serve non-consecutive terms was Democrat Grover Cleveland who won election in 1884, lost in 1888, and won in 1892.

http://cnsnews.com/blog/grant-m-dah...ible-obama-will-bow-out-presidential-race-now

Oops.

 

[zipman]

Don't kid yourself.

The inner city ballot-stuffers, the union thugs, and the public employees will storm out aplenty on election day. You can lose 20% of your base if 10% of the loyal vote eight times each.

Ah, the old multiple votes accusation. Of course it has never even come close to being validated.

Good of you to adopt it early to soothe the pain of the upcoming GOP defeat.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Hmmm. Didn't Vetteman talk up another provocative Dick Morris comment recently? Yes, I believe he did...wonder how that one turned out?






Oops.

He should know better by now than to get his news/editorials from CNS.

 

[unregistered]

 

[RobDownSouth]

Ah, the old multiple votes accusation. Of course it has never even come close to being validated.

Good of you to adopt it early to soothe the pain of the upcoming GOP defeat.

I've challenged numerous conservatives numerous times to give us evidence of widespread vote fraud in the past 50 years. They always counter with evidence of voter REGISTRATION fraud, which is an altogether different thing.

(Not to them, of course. It sounds similar so it must be similar, sorta like hot dogs and dogs).

 

[rosco rathbone]

Dick Morris lol. Next you'll be telling us that Pat Cadell recommends that the Democrat Party swing right to avoid alienating centrists.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Dick Morris lol. Next you'll be telling us that Pat Cadell recommends that the Democrat Party swing right to avoid alienating centrists.

If you go look it up, Pat Cadell sounds a lot like Morris...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Ah, the old multiple votes accusation. Of course it has never even come close to being validated.

Good of you to adopt it early to soothe the pain of the upcoming GOP defeat.

Hasn't been disproved either.

As I had to point out in another thread in which Democrats tried to prove there was no such thing by selective linking, if you go to the government and look it up, the first thing they admit is that there have been no comprehensive studies of the matter.

 

[rosco rathbone]

If you go look it up, Pat Cadell sounds a lot like Morris...

You don't say!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You don't say!

He's on the radio with some frequency...



It could turn around if the economy is truly turning around, but the 2010 election does not look like an aberration if you get to examining voting and party registration trends.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Hasn't been disproved either. DERP DERP DERP!

Good ole AJ, with his degree in "logic and mathmatics" (sic), trotting out his trusty Onus Probandi logical fallacy ("I need not prove my claim, the burden is on you to prove it false!")

Shift that burden of proof! HAW HAW!

Mama always said AJ and Intellectual Dishonesty goes together like peas 'n carrots....

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Good afternoon.




Still trying to master adult discussion?

Very good. Carry on. We'll let you know if you accidently get it right...

 

[cookiejar]

I just like to hear him talk. He could recite Mother Goose and I'd listen.