JackLuis
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Posts
- 21,881
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We need a new word entirely. "Slut" has always had a bad meaning.
It started out meaning a woman who didn't keep her house clean.
Then for a while it meant the woman who cleaned someone's house. Go figure.
It has never meant "a woman who of her own will chooses how to have sex, when and with whom-- and how often," and it is never going to. Too many people continue to use it to mean "a woman who has no sexual autonomy." You just can't reeducate enough people.
Good luck with that one.
I've been using it way too much, I typically use the term "adventurous" in mixed company, occasionally, "experienced".
"An experienced woman".
Experience me baby!
Hey look a plot bunny for the idiots over in the non con section! So a girl in the slut walk gets separated and ends up in a dark alley and gets raped repeatedly! I'd say she eventually likes it but then that would take the fun away for the rapists in training out there.![]()
A slut to me is just a chick that likes sex and objectification/humiliation, and/or, is confident enough to have a sense of humor about being a "slut", and I don't think it's synonymous with promiscuity necessarily, I think it has more to do with letting the walls down and allowing yourself to get into it
Heh. there's been a lot of discussion about calling these demonstrations "slutwalks" at all, because of the absolute probability that ironic hipsters would jump on the word and consider this permission to use it just as it has always been used.
Personally, I don't see how it can possibly be reclaimed. It's a term of denigration, and never will be anything else.
The walks themselves, however... Gorgeous!
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/About/General/2011/5/9/1304949153420/SlutWalk-007.jpg
My understanding is that this started in Canada after a policeman told a group of students that women shouldn't dress like "sluts" if they didn't want to get sexually assaulted.
“I wonder what a feminism designed by men would look like?”
A quick little parody by some blogger I stumbled upon while checking out the reactions on the net—but is it a parody?![]()
Isn't the (maddening to women) real issue that most men wouldn't bother to design it at all?
Sounds just about right...but what if she throws her assailant to the ground, rips off his pants, and stuffs his now-flacid "man"hood in her "womanhood." He screams in fear, and she slaps him, demanding he "get hard or get hurt." He finds he likes the thrill of being mounted and hit, and he eventually gets stiff. She finishes, and climbs off, leaving him huddled in the alley, sobbing softly as he tries to ease his aching, unerupted organ?
Hmmm intriguing concept. However, the problem there is most of the Non con audience is men and that would be insulting to their manhood! Every one knows a "real" man can rape and degrade any woman he wants too! Or at least that's what the big fat virgin slob living in his mom's basement fantasizing about hurting women thinks anyway.
Sorry if I am being subtle about my feelings here. I will try to be more direct next timelast post on the topic I promise!
I understood your aim, and mine was precisely to turn the tables on the middle-aged boys in their Mom's basements by giving them a real "slut."![]()
That's why they're scared of those nasty girls in the first place!! Some of them can be as tough and demanding as... well as their mom! uh-oh incest non con mother/son plot bunny coming up! Quick to the story ideas forum!
Good idea, but keep a good hold on your age guidelines as you run...![]()