Just an attempt to tone it down...

[Cruel2BKind]

I love porn, who on this site doesn't? One of my pet peeves is when a story is a bit (or more than a bit) over the top. Like when they describe a young skinny girl as having breasts literally the size of watermelons. The only real woman i've seen with breasts like that are older, often overweight, and often have given birth. The only young women with breasts like that have their boobies filled with packets of silicone gel, and if that's the case, specify.

Sorry, went off on a rant... But if anyone has pet peeves about over-the-topness, post them here and maybe that author who thinks that women have breasts the size of toasters will calm down.

 

[Tio_Narratore]

Two-Slice or Four? And can they accommodate bagels? Either way, those breasts are gonna be real hot once you turn them on.

 

[AlmostAlice]

Agreed, I've read stories that had cocks as wide as a coke can or wrist, which just made me go 'ehhh... no' and stop reading, unless it's for comic effect. Even if there are men with such huge penises I doubt it'd be at all pleasurable. Same with 'gallons of cum', though that's less of a turn-off.

 

[sr71plt]

You do realize that a lot of readers read these stories for the fantasy turn on, don't you?

 

[AlmostAlice]

Yeah, your mileage may vary as to the level of realism you like in your fantasies, and I'm not judging, it just breaks the suspension of disbelief for me personally.

 

[SamScribble]

In the world of eroticism, one person’s turn-on is another’s turn off.

I once met a graphic artist who made a reasonable living producing highly-detailed made-to-measure erotic illustrations. His clients got to specify pretty much every detail – who, what, where, and of course what size. And, having spent an interesting afternoon with him, flicking through the ‘file copies’ of his work, I can tell you that arousal was the furthest thing from my mind.

I don’t think written erotica’s any different. A good portion of the stories that I read – or try to read – on Lit leave me cold. But, every now and then ….

It’s different strokes for different folks – and I’m pretty sure that it always will be.

 

[_Lynn_]

I love porn, who on this site doesn't? One of my pet peeves is when a story is a bit (or more than a bit) over the top. Like when they describe a young skinny girl as having breasts literally the size of watermelons. The only real woman i've seen with breasts like that are older, often overweight, and often have given birth. The only young women with breasts like that have their boobies filled with packets of silicone gel, and if that's the case, specify.

Sorry, went off on a rant... But if anyone has pet peeves about over-the-topness, post them here and maybe that author who thinks that women have breasts the size of toasters will calm down.

There's porn on this site?

 

[Stella_Omega]

There's porn on this site?

Who knew!

But seriously, the writers who engage in watermelon-tit writing mostly don't bother to show up on the forums.

 

[TE999]

Any sex story that ID's the size of a woman's hooters and a guy's pecker in the first two paragraphs should be an automatic click of the back button for any reader with an imagination. IMO those stories are not unlike the stroker paperbacks of old and Letters to Penthouse.

 

[Noor]

Personally my favorite has always been the fit, thin woman with 44DDs. 44DDs make me think of a linebacker with implants. Seriously I am not a thin young thing and I am at best a 38 band size, a 44 would be like a man's suit jacket of 44 plus 6-7 inches tacked on the front.

Thin is a 32/34 band size. Also they tend to make the woman 5' 2" or 5' 3" and 120 lbs, at least 15 of which would probably be those 44DDs.

 

[estragon]

The "wanted poster" stories, with an exacting, detailed physical description of characters, is an instant turnoff. They read like a bad episode of "Quincy" or "CSI".