Your take on the King hearings...

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

you have all the lines though!

And a lure!

 

[Liar]

As far as the percentages go, I believe they're underestimated. And the only reason we aren't manning the shore batteries is because they don't have the means to confront us directly................yet.

I already responded to the why of the hearings. There are Muslims out there that are secular. They need a voice and support and this is one way of giving them voice. From that voice perhaps support will follow.

What we've learned are that there are secular groups out there. That they are raising a red flag too, and that they want to fight this plague back just as much as we do. And we've heard a lot of bullshit from those that have their head in the sand. They served their purpose as well. Sure as hell brought attention to the hearings.

Ishmael

Is the word you're looknig for really "secular"? Islam is after all a reigion. What we're looking for is non violent, non extremist Muslims that adhere to the secular law of the land and separation of chuch and state (which by the way is more than can be said about lots of Christian groups, but that's another discussion. ).

But anyway... So you say these hearings are all about giving voice and support to the good Muslim communities out there? (be they secular or not, but you know what I mean) The main critisism seems to be that instead of doing that, the gist and rhetoric of what is going down is about chastising and casting undue suspícion on them for not being actively anti exstremist enough.

So my question from a few posts up is still relevant:

Does the American citizen Abdullah Mohammed have any greater responsibility to denounce, root out and defeat Islamic Extremism than the American citizen Bob Smith?

And if so: Why?

 

[blunt_trauma]

And a lure!

you're waiting for me to nibble?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

I'm teasing with my line tipped with vibrant allure...





If that fails to work, I have my trusty red-wiggler ready for the hook.

 

[blunt_trauma]

I'm teasing with my line tipped with vibrant allure...





If that fails to work, I have my trusty red-wiggler ready for the hook.

another of pete's happy customers?
this has suddenly all gone horribly wrong.
can't we just shag?

 

[Saint Peter]

another of pete's happy customers?

That was uncalled for!

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

I think that's illegal in all but ArKansas, but we can run a trot line...





I have a hung gar for a catfish breakfast.

 

[blunt_trauma]

That was uncalled for!

wha'???

 

[blunt_trauma]

I think that's illegal in all but ArKansas, but we can run a trot line...

I have a hung gar for a catfish breakfast.

:insert oyster/pearl metaphore:

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

That was uncalled for!

Petey, Duck hunting is Suwndawe...




Calls scare the beaver.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

:insert oyster/pearl metaphore:

I was this close to a giant catfish/oyster catch, but it got away.




The best ones always do...

 

[Ishmael]

Is the word you're looknig for really "secular"? Islam is after all a reigion. What we're looking for is non violent, non extremist Muslims that adhere to the secular law of the land and separation of chuch and state (which by the way is more than can be said about lots of Christian groups, but that's another discussion. ).

But anyway... So you say these hearings are all about giving voice and support to the good Muslim communities out there? (be they secular or not, but you know what I mean) The main critisism seems to be that instead of doing that, the gist and rhetoric of what is going down is about chastising and casting undue suspícion on them for not being actively anti exstremist enough.

So my question from a few posts up is still relevant:

Does the American citizen Abdullah Mohammed have any greater responsibility to denounce, root out and defeat Islamic Extremism than the American citizen Bob Smith?

And if so: Why?

I see you couldn't resist taking a shot at Christians.

No, that is what the media and the naysayers are telling everyone that's what the hearings are about.

Yep. Because the hub of this activity is the Mosque and Bob Smith doesn't go to, or could get in, the Mosque.

And I suggest you do some reading concerning Islam. It is unique among the great religions in that it DOES NOT recognize secular law.

Ishmael

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

He's an Oik...

 

[blunt_trauma]

:insert something else: please.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

:insert something else: please.

Was that stink-bait before it was inserted?



I think we should troll for largemouth now...

 

[blunt_trauma]

Was that stink-bait before it was inserted?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Maybe I fished the wrong hole...




How 'bout over there in the weeds?

 

[Saint Peter]

You might want to pull that stainless hook out first.

 

[blunt_trauma]

weeds???

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

You might want to pull that stainless hook out first.

I'll fire up my electric ass-master and locate some hot tuna!

weeds???

Well, they do seem to be groomed...

It's just that the waters looked so choppy and untamed, able to hold the big ones...

 

[blunt_trauma]

Well, they do seem to be groomed...

It's just that the waters looked so choppy and untamed, able to hold the big ones...

nice save! i'm sure you narrowly escape many nights on the sofa.

...how big?

 

[where]

OK, I get the parody thread, but surely the title should be "your take on the King's Speech"?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

nice save! i'm sure you narrowly escape many nights on the sofa.

...how big?

HOW BIG???





:holds hands wide:

It was this big before it got away!

Now, don't laugh at the size of the one in my creel, it's very tender, even juicy, eating at that size...

 

[Liar]

I see you couldn't resist taking a shot at Christians.

I'm taling a shot a double standards. Call it what you wish.

 

[blunt_trauma]

HOW BIG???

:holds hands wide:

It was this big before it got away!

Now, don't laugh at the size of the one in my creel, it's very tender, even juicy, eating at that size...

the one that got away.
in a splash, it was gone.