Booted Out of the Tea Party!!!

[amicus]

I am not all that good at utilizing the 'social networks' that are available, but, I made an effort to promote Operation E Drop, an effort to provide free Ebooks to service men and women overseas.

So...when I went to log into my page at the Tea Party Patriots, I found I had been suspended!

Go figure!

No you aren ot allowed to promote or advertise your books on the site. There were numerous complaints. We make it very clear when you sign up that this is not allowed.

"This forum is for tea party activists only of all nations to discuss issues or legislation that fall under Tea Party Patriots three core values. (Limited government, fiscal responsibility, free markets). No discussions on social issues are allowed. You must adhere to those topics or your posts will be deleted . We don't allow advertising by anyone or campaigning by candidates. Advertising includes promoting another web site or posting information about items you are trying to sell. No profanity is allowed and advocating violence will not be tolerated. We will not tolerate racism. No attacks on other posters are allowed. This is our private blog for our tea party activist members only. We have the right to set the rules. If you don't follow the rules, you will be suspended without warning. Do you understand and agree to abide by these rules and do you state that you are a tea party activist that agrees with our core values ? "

To:
"Debbie Dooley" <debbie0040@yahoo.com>

No, thank you, my core values include the right of free speech and there are no limits on that.

You do a disservice to those who truly understand and have spent a lifetime advocating basic American values...forbidden to discuss social issues, are you joking?

I have no desire to be a part of any such pretend patriotic organization. I spent 30 years on talk radio and television speaking to those basic issues and I have no intention of being censored by some new upstart conservative voice without any credentials at all.

I remain

Amicus, a true patriot.

~~~

Now just what is it when a far left site, like this one, advocates censorship, and lo and Behold! So to does the far right!

Who are these fucking people on the left and the right who insist upon controlling free speech?

Seeing as how here and there they are both Cunts, I wonder what that says?

Bite me!

Amicus a free speech advocate and an American!

 

[Lady Reiha]

You said "jokintg?"




Ah well. Shrug it off and move on. ♥

 

[bronzeage]

The bastards.

I've been searching to find a person who will admit to being a tea party member and had no luck at all.

Now the first one who confesses membership doesn't meet their standards.

 

[amicus]

You said "jokintg?"




Ah well. Shrug it off and move on. ♥

~~~

I don't recall see you here before, but I fixed the typo, thank you.

Amicus

 

[amicus]

The bastards.

I've been searching to find a person who will admit to being a tea party member and had no luck at all.

Now the first one who confesses membership doesn't meet their standards.[/QUOTE]

~~~

Yeah, I figured folks here might get a kick out of me being booted off a so called conservative blog.

Social Issues, obama care, abortion, gay marriage and Down Sydrome children, not allowed? I should have said 'go fuck yourself', but, ahm, profanity is not permitted...go figure!



thanks...

ami

 

[Stella_Omega]

You should start your own forum for blithering egocentrics. Make the rules there, and enforce them.

Maybe Scouries will join, and the two of you can talk about the wonders of yourselves ad nauseum without fear of dissent-- or agreement for that matter, since the two of you will be the only people there and you wouldn't read each other's posts. You can talk about underage girls and he can talk about fucking his mother.

 

[sr71plt]

Your books are about underage sex and your political views are cockamamy. What made you think the tea party was going to tolerate that?

You're both dense and a deadbeat.

 

[Lady Reiha]

~~~

I don't recall see you here before, but I fixed the typo, thank you.

Amicus

I am here, there and everywhere. It's been a while since I've bounced into the AH.

 

[bronzeage]

The bastards.

I've been searching to find a person who will admit to being a tea party member and had no luck at all.

Now the first one who confesses membership doesn't meet their standards.[/QUOTE]

~~~

Yeah, I figured folks here might get a kick out of me being booted off a so called conservative blog.

Social Issues, obama care, abortion, gay marriage and Down Sydrome children, not allowed? I should have said 'go fuck yourself', but, ahm, profanity is not permitted...go figure!



thanks...

ami

You hate children with Down's Syndrome, too? I should have known.

 

[amicus]

I don't hate any children for anything, ever.

You misread me somehow, it is the limp left that aborts 7 out of 10 Down syndrome children and, if they could, would probably abort a child who was to be born deaf or blind.

It is a great sadness when a child is born less than perfect, but the child still has life, the greatest and most fundamental value of all.

I am fortunate that all 8 of my children were born healthy and thrived, and to care for a retarded child is a great undertaking and I applaud those who value life and worship it.

Amicus

 

[sr71plt]

I'm still laughing hilariously that you posted here that even the tea party has rejected you. You are a bottomless pit of cluelessness.

 

[michchick98]

I am not all that good at utilizing the 'social networks' that are available, but, I made an effort to promote Operation E Drop, an effort to provide free Ebooks to service men and women overseas.

So...when I went to log into my page at the Tea Party Patriots, I found I had been suspended!

Go figure!



To:
"Debbie Dooley" <debbie0040@yahoo.com>

No, thank you, my core values include the right of free speech and there are no limits on that.

You do a disservice to those who truly understand and have spent a lifetime advocating basic American values...forbidden to discuss social issues, are you joking?

I have no desire to be a part of any such pretend patriotic organization. I spent 30 years on talk radio and television speaking to those basic issues and I have no intention of being censored by some new upstart conservative voice without any credentials at all.

I remain

Amicus, a true patriot.

~~~

Now just what is it when a far left site, like this one, advocates censorship, and lo and Behold! So to does the far right!

Who are these fucking people on the left and the right who insist upon controlling free speech?

Seeing as how here and there they are both Cunts, I wonder what that says?

Bite me!

Amicus a free speech advocate and an American!

So now I wonder, based on what you quoted, if they'd consider their flooding of ABC's internet and phone voting for Bristol Palin on DWTS one of their three core values: "Limited government, fiscal responsibility, free markets."

Doesn't seem like helping Bristol advance to the finals of a reality TV show would really fall under any of those "core values."

Yeah, I know, it wasn't the same forum, but still. Okay, okay, I get it. "The show's been over for a six weeks now, get over it! Move on!"

Give 'em hell, amicus. Happy New Year.

 

[michchick98]

Social Issues, obama care, abortion, gay marriage and Down Sydrome children, not allowed? I should have said 'go fuck yourself', but, ahm, profanity is not permitted...go figure!



thanks...

ami

Well, since you were already kicked out....

Just sayin'

 

[bronzeage]

I don't hate any children for anything, ever.

You misread me somehow, it is the limp left that aborts 7 out of 10 Down syndrome children and, if they could, would probably abort a child who was to be born deaf or blind.

It is a great sadness when a child is born less than perfect, but the child still has life, the greatest and most fundamental value of all.

I am fortunate that all 8 of my children were born healthy and thrived, and to care for a retarded child is a great undertaking and I applaud those who value life and worship it.

Amicus

Your sequence was "obama care, abortion, gay marriage and Down Sydrome children," I know your feelings about the first three.

How would you feel if a gay couple chose to adopt a retarded child? You know, all in the spirit of valuing and worshiping life and all that stuff.

 

[Liar]

Heh, that did seem a bit harsh of them. It wasnt like you were spamming them with sour dough recipes and porn.

That being said, its their forum and their rules apply. If they want to have stupid rules and be anal about them then so be it. Its not about free speech, but about the privilidge of their podium.

Here nobody gets kicked out for being off topic. Merely scoffed at.

 

[bronzeage]

Heh, that did seem a bit harsh of them. It wasnt like you were spamming them with sour dough recipes and porn.

That being said, its their forum and their rules apply. If they want to have stupid rules and be anal about them then so be it. Its not about free speech, but about the privilidge of their podium.

Here nobody gets kicked out for being off topic. Merely scoffed at.

In the Republican Party hierarchy, the Tea Party is seen as the low level easily influenced and poorly informed members. The party leaders are very careful about who provides the influence and the information.

 

[amicus]

Your sequence was "obama care, abortion, gay marriage and Down Sydrome children," I know your feelings about the first three.

How would you feel if a gay couple chose to adopt a retarded child? You know, all in the spirit of valuing and worshiping life and all that stuff.[/QUOTE]

~~~

Bit of a strange day for me, bronzeage, not that it matters, but my youngest daughter is going back to college after an European tour and helping a sister who gave birth in August, and the little twit is late, but just called, be an hour or so yet and I am anxious to see her.

Most non gays and Americans in general, are tolerant of alternate life styles and I am one of them, 'live and let live', until the alternative life style intrudes upon my turf.

Because I know that a normative sexual environment, heterosexual, is essential to the proper development of a child, and since adoption is s State sanctioned institution, I am opposed to any adoptions by same sex parents.

I am also opposed to public schools teaching toleration for the homosexual lifestyle and equality under the law equitable to heterosexuals, because it enters doubt in a child's mind concerning his or her own sexuality.

There is no evidence of a 'gay gene' a discussion we had here years ago; thus, it is a chosen lifestyle that has become more convenient in a half century of change in the social structure.

If one can employ objectivity as one assesses the changes, it becomes a challenging exercise to determine just where society is headed and if it will be a good change or not.

Tranditional marriage and family structure are under intense pressure to change into something else, but what?

One thing that troubles me, hypothetically, is the vitriolic hatred expressed by a few here towards any one that questions their chosen lifestyle and speaks in defense of conventional social more's. I can understand the pressure many are under and have been under, to continually justify their lifestyle, but the total lack of civility and personal attacks, indicates a degenerating juxtaposition of differing points of view.

Amicus

 

[sr71plt]

You reap what you sow, Ami. Beyond that, you really, really are a disgusting cyber person.

 

[bronzeage]

Your sequence was "obama care, abortion, gay marriage and Down Sydrome children," I know your feelings about the first three.

How would you feel if a gay couple chose to adopt a retarded child? You know, all in the spirit of valuing and worshiping life and all that stuff.[/QUOTE]

~~~

Bit of a strange day for me, bronzeage, not that it matters, but my youngest daughter is going back to college after an European tour and helping a sister who gave birth in August, and the little twit is late, but just called, be an hour or so yet and I am anxious to see her.

Most non gays and Americans in general, are tolerant of alternate life styles and I am one of them, 'live and let live', until the alternative life style intrudes upon my turf.

Because I know that a normative sexual environment, heterosexual, is essential to the proper development of a child, and since adoption is s State sanctioned institution, I am opposed to any adoptions by same sex parents.

I am also opposed to public schools teaching toleration for the homosexual lifestyle and equality under the law equitable to heterosexuals, because it enters doubt in a child's mind concerning his or her own sexuality.

There is no evidence of a 'gay gene' a discussion we had here years ago; thus, it is a chosen lifestyle that has become more convenient in a half century of change in the social structure.

If one can employ objectivity as one assesses the changes, it becomes a challenging exercise to determine just where society is headed and if it will be a good change or not.

Tranditional marriage and family structure are under intense pressure to change into something else, but what?

One thing that troubles me, hypothetically, is the vitriolic hatred expressed by a few here towards any one that questions their chosen lifestyle and speaks in defense of conventional social more's. I can understand the pressure many are under and have been under, to continually justify their lifestyle, but the total lack of civility and personal attacks, indicates a degenerating juxtaposition of differing points of view.

Amicus

Since you know that " a normative sexual environment, heterosexual, is essential to the proper development of a child", how do you account for all the homosexuals who were born and raised in a heterosexual homes?

 

[colddiesel]

You should start your own forum for blithering egocentrics. Make the rules there, and enforce them.

.

Remind us Stella, who tried to achieve just that a few months back.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Since you know that " a normative sexual environment, heterosexual, is essential to the proper development of a child", how do you account for all the homosexuals who were born and raised in a heterosexual homes?

And also, what, exactly does Ami consider "his turf," because it looks like he thinks MY life and MY children and MY marriage are somehow his turf.

And of course nobody is pressuring traditional marriage to change. You want a traditional marriage have one, You want a traditional family structure, more power to you. Nobody is trying to make you illegal.

You want to interfere in My marriage because you think it's going to damage yours somehow? You know quite well who has hurt your marriage(s) and that would be your very own fuckface self.

 

[amicus]

Since you know that " a normative sexual environment, heterosexual, is essential to the proper development of a child", how do you account for all the homosexuals who were born and raised in a heterosexual homes?[/QUOTE]

~~~

To perhaps present my bonafide's, know that I studied alongside my daughter through four years of Psychology, another year of Graduate work, in addition to my own University education which included upper level courses in behavioral psychology and abnormal, clinical psychiatry..

Toss in a few dozen on air interviews with practicing psychologists and psychiatrists and University professors in the discipline.

'Normative' is a term liberals detest because it implies that there does exist a normal, rational approach to living that de-emphasizes the emotional or subject aspects of human existence.
\
If one views 'normative' in a subjective light, then the Liberals have a point as life and social conditions are ever changing. But if you view 'normative' from a studied, rational and objective attempt to comprehend human nature in a reality based scenario, then it is possible to arrive at some fairly stable conclusions.

how do you account for all the homosexuals who were born and raised in a heterosexual homes

I know, it took half a page to arrive at your question.

In a 'normative' heterosexual marriage, both the masculine and the feminine characteristics of the partners offers a balanced environment for child nurturing. Then the fun begins, there are dominating women and submissive men that may or may not reflect how they were separately brought up in a family situation. Flavor that with Oedipal and Electra complexes, a childs infatuation with a parent and the results can be almost anything.

A child learns quickly during the first eight years of life and during that same period, is most subject to influence from within and without the home.

Gender confusion, brought on by many variables, can produce an adolescent unsure of his or her sexuality. Add to that, two full generations of 'liberated' women, the feminist movement, changing roles in family relationships where both parents work outside the home, and you have a witches brew of possible outcomes.

That is not a hard and fast answer to your question, but perhaps it gives you an idea of the complexity of the subject.
\
To me, the serious problems arise when institutional influences are ambiguous, do not directly support the innate sexual nature of the individual child, but rather makes no value judgments and assumes an amoral, agnostic approach to the entire subject of human sexuality.

Daned daughter ain't here yet. I keep looking down the street...sighs...kids!

Ami

 

[Stella_Omega]

Oedipal and Electrical complexes, huh? In other words, you don't know shit from shinola.

 

[Handley_Page]

I am not all that good at utilizing the 'social networks' that are available, but, I made an effort to promote Operation E Drop, an effort to provide free Ebooks to service men and women overseas.

So...when I went to log into my page at the Tea Party Patriots, I found I had been suspended!

Dear Debbie,
I assume from your message that supporting our Troops in foreign parts is somehow unpatriotic ?

 

[Bebeslut]

I'd hardly say Literotica promotes censorship. Nor would I call it far left.
Each to his own interpretation, I guess.

I am not all that good at utilizing the 'social networks' that are available, but, I made an effort to promote Operation E Drop, an effort to provide free Ebooks to service men and women overseas.

So...when I went to log into my page at the Tea Party Patriots, I found I had been suspended!

Go figure!



To:
"Debbie Dooley" <debbie0040@yahoo.com>

No, thank you, my core values include the right of free speech and there are no limits on that.

You do a disservice to those who truly understand and have spent a lifetime advocating basic American values...forbidden to discuss social issues, are you joking?

I have no desire to be a part of any such pretend patriotic organization. I spent 30 years on talk radio and television speaking to those basic issues and I have no intention of being censored by some new upstart conservative voice without any credentials at all.

I remain

Amicus, a true patriot.

~~~

Now just what is it when a far left site, like this one, advocates censorship, and lo and Behold! So to does the far right!

Who are these fucking people on the left and the right who insist upon controlling free speech?

Seeing as how here and there they are both Cunts, I wonder what that says?

Bite me!

Amicus a free speech advocate and an American!