Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do thoughts in stories require quotations? I have been writing without them. I am a new writer and not all that great on grammar and punctuation. Any where I can learn more?
The "Vic TG School of What Looks Best" has all monologue, dialogue, and multilogue in quotes whether spoken or internal contained in double-quotes such that italics can remain available for such things as whispering and stress.
For example, I came across a line in a story of mine that I always liked (doesn't happen terribly often) that would have been ruined if italics were monologue:
She had gotten wet watching her brother! which admittedly isn't the most original line nor the most interesting, but it was quite fascinating in context. Since the story is written in non-partial third-person, it's apparant that the author not the character is distributing this information. If the character, it would've red, "I had gotten wet...!" With the line in quotes, italics are still available to denote stress or whispering. If we're forced to use solely italics, then, I had gotten wet...! Which either has double-italics (stress used on italicized words that end up removing them altogether) or is still all italics which doesn't leave room for italic inflection.
Transfering a quote over from a thread that was closed into this:
"I agree, in the states, publishers widely recognize the CMS, but it's hardly universal, even within that context.
P.S.
With Chicago in the title, I'm surprised anyone from New York uses it, lol."
The point is that there is an authority recognized and adhered to in the main for fiction style by nearly every U.S. publisher, and it is the Chicago Manual of Style. So, whether or not someone wants to follow that style in their writing for Literotica, standards do exist (the statement was that there probably are no standards on rendering thoughts in text) and they aren't based on what city someone is from (or amateur writers' personal quirks and failure to research standards) .
I don't see it. Why is it so difficult to understand the value of the CMS? If anyone wants to grow in their writing, then following publisher's guidelines would be a smart way to go.
But what do I know, eh?
It's a blind leading the blind thing. And folks thinking they know when they don't and can't be bothered to learn--because it's so much easier to pretend.
It's one thing to choose not to learn and develop; it's quite another to set yourself up as some sort of guru in something you only know enough about to be dangerous to everyone around you.
ML & SR -
CMS (or at least my edition - 13th I think) leaves room for either quotes or italics for internal dialogue. Which way do you two lean?
-PF
ML & SR -
CMS (or at least my edition - 13th I think) leaves room for either quotes or italics for internal dialogue. Which way do you two lean?
-PF
I still like the italics... .
Italics is my preference. But I don't have the new CMS.
I guess you aren't asking about sexual orientation.
My tacit understanding is that, of the three of us, I'm the only one that likes women.![]()
What about SR's wife?
Does she like women too?
Sorry SR, I didn't realize you played both sides of the pitch. Must have made for some interesting single days.
What about SR's wife?
She seemed to enjoy our 40th wedding anniversary well enough.![]()
How exactly is someone a little bit gay
Please, don't stop there. Details. Give me details.![]()
The answer is that everyone is more than a bit bi. Some just catch on before others--and thus have the extra enjoyment of it.