Will Obama be a Clinton or a Carter?

[KingOrfeo]

And how will that be any different than their current strategy of abusing the filibuster in unprecidented ways?

It will add gloating.

 

[RightField]

I can't speak for everyone, but I loved Lou Costello, and I don't think he belongs on this list.

Think of Lou playing President and Abbott playing Rahm Emmanuel.

Now think of them together (Abbott and Costello) deciding what to do with the Economy...Abbott trying to explain his choices along these lines...."You can do what the Republicans want and return the money to the people that earned it or you could give it to the UAW and the SEIU who will just give it back to us on the form of campaign contributions"

 

[clutch1]

I can't picture Rahm giving Obama a Bud Abbott smack across the face, can you?

Also mustard was made for the hot dog.

 

[RightField]

I can't picture Rahm giving Obama a Bud Abbott smack across the face, can you?

Also mustard was made for the hot dog.

lol...maybe not, maybe so.

Picture Obama as Lou and Michelle as Abbott...now can you picture the smack across the face?

Picture her explaining to him how he should go to Chicago for his birthday while she goes to Spain to meet the king.

 

[overthebow]

Just so long as he isn't another Bush.

Oh, yeah, you can go fuck yourself.

 

[RightField]

Just so long as he isn't another Bush.

Oh, yeah, you can go fuck yourself.

It is psychologically interesting that so many of you liberals are filled with animosity and hate. Why do so many of you resort to personal attacks? Is it the recognition that the modern liberal philosophical foundation is again showing itself to be a complete failure and that classical liberalism is ascendant again?

 

[Loring2]

At what ...

Certainly not in intelligence. I think even the RWs here must concede that Obama is way smarter than Reagan was.

Contradicting himself depending on the audience he's talking to ?

 

[overthebow]

It is psychologically interesting that so many of you liberals are filled with animosity and hate. Why do so many of you resort to personal attacks? Is it the recognition that the modern liberal philosophical foundation is again showing itself to be a complete failure and that classical liberalism is ascendant again?

You are obviously not done fucking your self.

Go back and finish the job.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Where's the option for Ill. Douche?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Certainly not in intelligence. I think even the RWs here must concede that Obama is way smarter than Reagan was.

Reagan wrote his own material.

Obama was all about the affirmative action...

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

It is psychologically interesting that so many of you liberals are filled with animosity and hate. Why do so many of you resort to personal attacks? Is it the recognition that the modern liberal philosophical foundation is again showing itself to be a complete failure and that classical liberalism is ascendant again?

In the minority, they never had to defend their positions, they only attacked, so they never developed any skills other than the slogan and the ad hominem, whereas we had to learn and come of with something a tad bit smarter than "I'm rubber...,"

They just "know" everything instinctively 'cause they were born "smarter" than us and Obama is the proof.
__________________
Contemporary leftists, on the other hand, view their opponents as people you send off to the Gulag, unworthy of any respect, deserving of any kind of low blow, no matter how foul. So you accuse Goldwater of insanity, slander Justice Thomas as a sexual monster, casually publish plays, books, and films calling for the assassination of President Bush, and assault the first serious Republican female candidate at her weakest point -- her family. And of course, you scream to high heaven if any form of turnabout occurs in your direction, as in the case of the Obama family, which was declared "off limits" early in the presidential campaign, at the same time that Palin's family was being stretched on the media rack.

This style of political loathing has become effectively innate. It has been systemized to such a degree as to become integral. Modern liberalism cannot do without it. An entire structure has been erected on the basis of political hatred, and from that structure a whole new strategy has arisen.
J.R. Dunn

Promiscuous charges of bigotry are precisely how our current rulers and their vast media auxiliary react to an obstreperous citizenry that insists on incorrect thinking.

Resistance to the vast expansion of government power, intrusiveness and debt, as represented by the Tea Party movement? Why, racist resentment toward a black president.

Disgust and alarm with the federal government's unwillingness to curb illegal immigration, as crystallized in the Arizona law? Nativism.

Opposition to the most radical redefinition of marriage in human history, as expressed in Proposition 8 in California? Homophobia.

Opposition to a 15-story Islamic center and mosque near Ground Zero? Islamophobia.

Now we know why the country has become "ungovernable," last year's excuse for the Democrats' failure of governance: Who can possibly govern a nation of racist, nativist, homophobic Islamophobes?

Note what connects these issues. In every one, liberals have lost the argument in the court of public opinion. ... What's a liberal to do? Pull out the bigotry charge, the trump that preempts debate and gives no credit to the seriousness and substance of the contrary argument.
Charles Krauthammer

I can add one Mr. Krauthammer:
Opposition to man-made Global Warming models? Denier. Creationist.
Another now...
Opposition to any of the Obama-Pelosi-Reid legislation? Tea bagger.
A_J, the Stupid

 

[RightField]

You are obviously not done fucking your self.

Go back and finish the job.

Just another step in the long road to illuminating the barren path to ruin that's called modern liberalism.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

It used to be called Socialism until Socialists gave Socialism a bad name...

 

[RightField]

It used to be called Socialism until Socialists gave Socialism a bad name...

Did you read the article by the German economics professor lamenting the "transformation" of America? He said that the world doens't need another anemic European economy, they need a vibrant and growing America. He also said that Obama is turning his back on the very things that made America great. "Hope and Change" is almost bankrupt.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Yes.





Must be the Austrian School...

SOmeone, QUICK!, remind Obama again that Austrian "ess knot a languwage..."

I need to see if I can find the one with the German intellectual bemoaning the fall of her beloved East Germany...

 

[jeninflorida]

He'll be a reagan.

but Ragan was voted out last night on big brother.

the only reason why Clinton had a good economy, was due to high tech. if you remove technology, Clinton would have sucked just as much as Monica.

why can't you fools see that? What did Clinton do? sure, he did some interns....but really, you think Clinton was responsible for the economy?

Richard, stop drinking so much of the jim jones juice

 

[jeninflorida]

obama will go down in history....below Carter. can't wait for the Leno to use obama as the butt of jokes....as obama is an ass

You are obviously not done fucking your self.

Go back and finish the job.

 

[Beco]

Well, that's the thing. So far, we've seen no sign they will. Other than "No!" they don't really have an agenda to run on. They haven't even said how they would address unemployment. So, if they do win . . . nothing productive is likely to get done.

Supposedly they're workign on it and will present in a month. Other than that, no real message from the Republicans other than, Obama sucks

 

[NaughtyTiffany]

I like Obama. He's hot

 

[jeninflorida]

Supposedly they're workign on it and will present in a month. Other than that, no real message from the Republicans other than, Obama sucks

only one message is needed, stop spending.
with a p.s. obama sucks but not in a Monica kind of way

 

[mercury14]

obama will go down in history....below Carter.

We're all pretty sure you've never heard of most presidents. 'Scuse us if we don't put much faith in your rankings.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Reagan wrote his own material.

Doubtful.

 

[RightField]

Doubtful.

Long after he became President, someone dug up his notes from when he ran a radio program. His notes were long and detailed explanations of his positions on the issues of the day. Many of those same topics were the ones he faced as President. He'd done his homework and it was proved through his many position papers. I believe that these papers were published as a book, though I didn't track it close enough to go purchase the book.

With the ongoing liberal umbrage with his Presidency and the descriptions of him as an "amiable dunce", it was quite a revelation to find these detailed notes in his own handrwriting. It showed that he was thoroughly versed on the topics he faced and held firm positions based on extensive thought and research.

The facts are unequivocal, he led our nation out of the malaise of Carter and ushered in a period of tremendous economic growth and revitalized our "pride" in America. Along the way, he also put to bed the cold war. Compare that to Carter, or, for that matter, Obama and the sinking level of confidence that the nation has in his ability to lead.

 

[Slowlane]

He's a bigger looser than Carter and a bigger lyer than Clinton.

 

[Luk]

He's a bigger looser than Carter and a bigger lyer than Clinton.

Maybe, but I bet he can spell "loser" and "liar". Hard to take an insult seriously when you do shit like that.