Republicans may pay dearly for alienating poor voters with their campaign of hate.

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
You've been telling this segment of Americans to get lost. Now they may find themselves... at the ballot box. You've alienated Blacks and Hispanics, and you've alienated the poor.

Think long term... 2010 may be the year that you jump the shark. If you even get that far...

http://www.dailyrecord.com/article/20100722/UPDATES01/100721098/Welfare+agencies+see+wave+of+voters

Welfare agencies see wave of voters

The recession that impoverished millions of Americans is producing a side effect: new voters.

Lawsuits by voting rights groups in Missouri and Ohio have led hundreds of thousands of people to file voter registration applications at welfare agencies, as mandated by the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, or the "motor voter" law. Cases pending in Indiana, New Mexico and other states, as well as new Justice Department guidelines, probably will boost those figures.

Voting rights advocates say millions of low-income people could be registered this way. A U.S. Election Assistance Commission report in 2007-08 showed 21 states registered less than 1 percent of voters at welfare offices. Only Vermont, Tennessee and New York registered more than 4 percent that way.

An increase could help President Obama and his party. A USA TODAY/Gallup Poll in June showed 55 percent of Americans with incomes less than $20,000 like Obama's performance, tied for his best showing among income groups.

Those numbers could influence elections. Nearly 90 percent of registered voters cast ballots in 2008, according to the Census Bureau. Republican John McCain won Missouri by 4,000 votes in 2008.

The Census Bureau says 71 percent of eligible Americans were registered to vote in 2008, but only 64 percent of those with family incomes less than $20,000 did so. "When you're on food stamps, your primary concern is where your next meal is going to come from," says Nicole Kovite of Project Vote, one of the litigants.

The 1993 law requires most states to offer voter registration at motor vehicles offices, social services agencies and other sites. More than 2.6 million people filled out voter registration applications at public aid offices in 1995-96, or 6.3 percent of all applicants. The number dropped below 1 million by 2007-08.

Donetta Davidson, who chairs the Election Assistance Commission, sees ample reason for the lawsuits. "I think these groups have a reason to holler 'foul,' " she says. "Things fall through the cracks, and you don't want to disenfranchise your voters."

Jason Torchinsky, a former Justice Department lawyer in the Bush administration, says liberal groups want welfare offices to replace the work of ACORN, a coalition of anti-poverty groups that disbanded this year after allegations of voter fraud.

"With the demise of ACORN, the left needs somebody to pick up that function," he says.
 
Why are you a racist? Why are you a wife-beater?




You've been telling this segment of Americans to get lost. Now they may find themselves... at the ballot box. You've alienated Blacks and Hispanics, and you've alienated the poor.

Think long term... 2010 may be the year that you jump the shark. If you even get that far...

http://www.dailyrecord.com/article/20100722/UPDATES01/100721098/Welfare+agencies+see+wave+of+voters

Welfare agencies see wave of voters

The recession that impoverished millions of Americans is producing a side effect: new voters.

Lawsuits by voting rights groups in Missouri and Ohio have led hundreds of thousands of people to file voter registration applications at welfare agencies, as mandated by the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, or the "motor voter" law. Cases pending in Indiana, New Mexico and other states, as well as new Justice Department guidelines, probably will boost those figures.

Voting rights advocates say millions of low-income people could be registered this way. A U.S. Election Assistance Commission report in 2007-08 showed 21 states registered less than 1 percent of voters at welfare offices. Only Vermont, Tennessee and New York registered more than 4 percent that way.

An increase could help President Obama and his party. A USA TODAY/Gallup Poll in June showed 55 percent of Americans with incomes less than $20,000 like Obama's performance, tied for his best showing among income groups.

Those numbers could influence elections. Nearly 90 percent of registered voters cast ballots in 2008, according to the Census Bureau. Republican John McCain won Missouri by 4,000 votes in 2008.

The Census Bureau says 71 percent of eligible Americans were registered to vote in 2008, but only 64 percent of those with family incomes less than $20,000 did so. "When you're on food stamps, your primary concern is where your next meal is going to come from," says Nicole Kovite of Project Vote, one of the litigants.

The 1993 law requires most states to offer voter registration at motor vehicles offices, social services agencies and other sites. More than 2.6 million people filled out voter registration applications at public aid offices in 1995-96, or 6.3 percent of all applicants. The number dropped below 1 million by 2007-08.

Donetta Davidson, who chairs the Election Assistance Commission, sees ample reason for the lawsuits. "I think these groups have a reason to holler 'foul,' " she says. "Things fall through the cracks, and you don't want to disenfranchise your voters."

Jason Torchinsky, a former Justice Department lawyer in the Bush administration, says liberal groups want welfare offices to replace the work of ACORN, a coalition of anti-poverty groups that disbanded this year after allegations of voter fraud.

"With the demise of ACORN, the left needs somebody to pick up that function," he says.
 
You mean they had the poor to lose?


You big dummy...

Considering that red states are larger consumers of federal tax dollars, I'm thinking yes.

But this has been shown to you before many times.

per a report published by the Tax Foundation for FY 2005..

Top 10 states receiving the most in federal spending per dollar of federal taxes paid (red states in bold):
1) DC $5.55
2) New Mexico $2.03
3) Mississippi $2.02
4) Alaska $1.84
5) Louisiana $1.78
6) West Virginia $1.76
7) North Dakota $1.68
8) Alabama $1.66
9) South Dakota $1.53
10) Kentucky $1.51

The next 10?
11) Virginia $1.51
12) Montana $1.47
13) Hawaii $1.44
14) Maine $1.41
15) Arkansas $1.41
16) Oklahoma $1.36
17) South Carolina $1.35
18) Missouri $1.32
19) Maryland $1.30
20) Tennessee $1.27


Of the top 20 states receiving the most federal tax money per dollar paid 15 are red states.
Link to the report published in October 2007. http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/266.html
 
What the hell does that have to do with anything?




Example:

In West Virginia, everything is named after Ronald Reagan?
 
Example 2

Missouri is a PURPLE State.



Been that way since the 1840's...

You and firespin need to learn that the latest stat that you just pulled out of your ass doesn't EVER tell the entire story...

Fawkin' peas in a pod you two...
 
Yo, yo, yo, LT.



Your posse is here, U_D, firespin, ThrobdownSouth.

Now you can have a decent conversation with people of like intellect!
 
Well, it’s very simple. We have horrible leadership and the trolls want others to pay more in taxes to support horrible leadership. UD, Luke, Alan Harper all want other people to pay for their way of life….some even claim to have a desire to work…which I really doubt. What these people want is more government and less free enterprise. since they have failed in corporate America their only missing in life is to land an obama job. They know that obama is in trouble and the only way to support the dream is to insure some how democrats stay in spending power.



What the hell does that have to do with anything?




Example:

In West Virginia, everything is named after Ronald Reagan?
 
Missouri is a PURPLE State.



Been that way since the 1840's...

You and firespin need to learn that the latest stat that you just pulled out of your ass doesn't EVER tell the entire story...

Fawkin' peas in a pod you two...

Yup, pulled out of my ass. :rolleyes:

Backed of course by research.
 
Well, it’s very simple. We have horrible leadership and the trolls want others to pay more in taxes to support horrible leadership. UD, Luke, Alan Harper all want other people to pay for their way of life….some even claim to have a desire to work…which I really doubt. What these people want is more government and less free enterprise. since they have failed in corporate America their only missing in life is to land an obama job. They know that obama is in trouble and the only way to support the dream is to insure some how democrats stay in spending power.

Just one misinformed statement after another, complete with making claims about your "enemies" that are hopeful speculation on your part.

Nothing new from you Jen. Just the same tired old speculative regurgitation of right wing-nut talking points.

Tell us again how there are SO many jobs out there that those lazy fucking unemployed people just won't take.
 
Stats in a vacuum really don't mean a thing.




In the red states the BLUE cities are densely packed with the poor and usually wield a lot of political power.

KC and St. Louie tend to dominate the Missourah legislature...

Same thing in KANSAS with KC and Wichita.

;) ;)
__________________
"Don't get stuck on stupid!"
Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré
 
Just one misinformed statement after another, complete with making claims about your "enemies" that are hopeful speculation on your part.

Nothing new from you Jen. Just the same tired old speculative regurgitation of right wing-nut talking points.

Tell us again how there are SO many jobs out there that those lazy fucking unemployed people just can't take because illegals hold them.

You needed a little help finishing that one...
 
Stats in a vacuum really don't mean a thing.




In the red states the BLUE cities are densely packed with the poor and usually wield a lot of political power.

KC and St. Louie tend to dominate the Missourah legislature...

Same thing in KANSAS with KC and Wichita.

;) ;)
__________________
"Don't get stuck on stupid!"
Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré

LMAO!

So your defense of red states suckling at the federal teat are the inner city poor dominating state politics?

You can't really be that stupid. It's an act right?
 
LMAO!

So your defense of red states suckling at the federal teat are the inner city poor dominating state politics?

You can't really be that stupid. It's an act right?

It stems from the power of incumbency, who gets to choose Congressmen and Senators, and which states are prone to keep reelecting and giving seniority to people like Robert Byrd who successfully brings home a disproportionate amount of pork to his "red" state...

I dispute totally your characterization of Red and Blue States.

It's as stupid as the economic faux metric of jobs saved and created.

And being called stupid by the likes of you is no badge of shame for anyone...
 
It stems from the power of incumbency, who gets to choose Congressmen and Senators, and which states are prone to keep reelecting and giving seniority to people like Robert Byrd who successfully brings home a disproportionate amount of pork to his "red" state...

I dispute totally your characterization of Red and Blue States.

It's as stupid as the economic faux metric of jobs saved and created.

And being called stupid by the likes of you is no badge of shame for anyone...

Ah, so it's all of the inner city poor that keep voting incumbents into office that make red states rake in disproportionate amounts of federal cash?

I don't think that you've thought this through much, or at all.

You can dispute reality all you want Cap'n. That doesn't make it not so.
 
Missouri is a PURPLE State.



Been that way since the 1840's...

You and firespin need to learn that the latest stat that you just pulled out of your ass doesn't EVER tell the entire story...

Fawkin' peas in a pod you two...

And Virginia has two democrat Senators.
 
Ah, so it's all of the inner city poor that keep voting incumbents into office that make red states rake in disproportionate amounts of federal cash?

I don't think that you've thought this through much, or at all.

You can dispute reality all you want Cap'n. That doesn't make it not so.

You're repeating yourself...
 
instead of following party lines...why not demand more?

your little charles rangel is in some hot water....and he doesn't like MSNBC


LMAO!

So your defense of red states suckling at the federal teat are the inner city poor dominating state politics?

You can't really be that stupid. It's an act right?
 
You're repeating yourself...

One way to reinforce the truth to the utterly benighted is to repeat it. Eventually you may see the light through your blindered eyes.

I'm not holding my breath though. It'll take you awhile to find an appropriate passage from the "Thinker", Malkin, or Limbaugh's latest rant to try to refute it.
 
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
U_D is more stupid than stupid...
 
Ah, so it's all of the inner city poor that keep voting incumbents into office that make red states rake in disproportionate amounts of federal cash?

I don't think that you've thought this through much, or at all.

You can dispute reality all you want Cap'n. That doesn't make it not so.

And what states have a disproportionate amount of Black folks? Hint, "What football conference sends around 10 of its 12 teams to bowl games every year?"
 
Just a note for you ignorant right wingtards out there.

It's a known fact that the poor vote less than other groups. you Republotards count on this every election cycle.

It's when that trend becomes no longer true that your asses are truly doomed. And this welfare voter registration thing may very well be the burning wick leading to that demographical powder keg laying under your flabby little asses.

55% of the <$20,000/year crowd still support Obama. Despite ALL the anti-Obama propaganda.

And I'm sitting at a downtown Starbuck's right now helping some guys write up neighborhood plans to get out the welfare AND Hispanic vote. Hell, we may very well defeat all three Republican hopefuls in California! :nana:
 
Back
Top