Who is winning the post creation race?

[DVS]

OK, this is just for fun. But aren't the best jokes those with a little truth to them?

Voting is private and also multiple choice.

Update:
This should be THREADS created, not posts. Although I think the same person would win, either way. And you can also select your own if you want, by posting their name. It's no sin to start a thread. Well, maybe we should all try some gum.

 

[Kikori]

Just his whining about "Kill yourself" puts Bloved far in front.

Ethics of casual BDSM, 1828
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1860
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1864
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1866
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1869
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1870
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1873
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1877
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1899
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1905
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1925
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1927
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1932
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1936
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1938
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1940
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1945
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1947
Bloved!, 46
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1949
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1951
BLoved!, 57
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1962
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1965
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1966
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1973
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1976
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1989 (How dare he disrespect my birth year with his spam!? XD)
Ethics of casual BDSM, 1991
Bloved seeks Beloved - Ontario, 15
Isolation, 34
Does BDSM facilitate a haven for abusers, 56
Isolation, 57
Ethics of casual BDSM, 2205
Ethics of casual BDSM, 2207
A few tips for Submissives questing, 34
Ethics of casual BDSM, 2231
A few tips for Submissives questing, 51
A few tips for Submissives questing, 57
What does a dom risk, 16
What does Love-based BDSM look like, 128

Aside from him, Daddy and chy have good streaks going. :d

 

[Keroin]

I voted for gum.



You jump started my curiousity, DVS, and I had to go check...109 threads, since Jan 2009...

 

[Kikori]

... So we're talking about topics created, not posts made?

 

[DVS]

... So we're talking about topics created, not posts made?

Yes, my mistake. Threads created.

 

[WriterDom]

Keroin! Only because BLoved hasn't posted any naked pictures yet.

 

[DVS]

Keroin! Only because BLoved hasn't posted any naked pictures yet.

Oh! Very good point.


But, naked pictures of BLoved?

 

[midwestyankee]

Keroin! Only because BLoved hasn't posted any naked pictures yet.

Sweet Jeebus, man....don't give him any ideas.

 

[Keroin]

Sweet Jeebus, man....don't give him any ideas.

Like giving a pack of matches to a two year old.

 

[sinnocence]

But, naked pictures of BLoved?

Gross.

 

[FloggingMolly]

I'd never seen orange jelly (jello?) in reverse...

til now

 

[satindesire]

*pops her head in*


Gum! *Squeal!*




*Runs off*

 

[Stella_Omega]

Gum, motherfuckers.

 

[Bette_coquette]

No naked pictures of bloved! His mustache makes me vurp just a little.

 

[Homburg]

Gum.

I have Dluded on ignore, so I see exactly zero of the panoply of threads he's apparently created.

 

[Stella_Omega]

Gum.

I have Dluded on ignore, so I see exactly zero of the panoply of threads he's apparently created.

bummer man, there have been some good discussions on the side, as always happens.

 

[chy_girl]

Keroin! Only because BLoved hasn't posted any naked pictures yet.

Sweet Jeebus, man....don't give him any ideas.

No, no, no... If he posted nekked pics we could start our own version of a "save the subbies" campaign with really good posters.

I'd never seen orange jelly (jello?) in reverse...

til now

*offers napkin*

 

[Homburg]

bummer man, there have been some good discussions on the side, as always happens.

Yeah, I just got tired of seeing all the drek, so I ignored him. That meant that the threads to which I was subscribed I still saw other people posting, but only saw him when someone quoted him. It does mean that I've lost out here and there, but it is a price I pay to not see 300 Dluded threads.