I call Bullshit on The Tea Party

[Sean]

Jesus, here's the other worst offender.

 

[MeeMie]

I know, but it's fun to watch him try and defend himself without a c+p. For instance, according to MM, McCain was made Rep candidate because thousands of Dems registered as Republicans in the closed primaries.

Sean, I've explained this in depth to you previously ... including links for your own research. You are too closed minded to consider that primary elections are not all closed. I will not be wasting my time explaining any more.



I do not favor 'open primaries', and neither should any thinking conservative.
They do not work to the advantage of conservatives. They allow Democrats, who lack all sense of fair play, decency and honesty to make mischief and "help" Republicans choose bad candidates, as they did during the 2008 GOP Presidential race. Without cross voting Democrats, McCain would not have won the nomination.

Open-primaries for Presidential primaries should be voided. Votes cast in such would not be accredited in our conventions. Party chairs would be required to demonstrate that only Republicans were involved in selecting the states delegates.

Michael Steele has done NOTHING to fix the abuses of 2008, leaving us even more open to cheating by the loonies in 2012. Democrats will vote for another bad candidate in the GOP primary to defeat any authentic Conservative who has momentum in 2008.

 

[Sean]

Sean, I've explained this in depth to you previously ... including links for your own research. You are too closed minded to consider that primary elections are not all closed. I will not be wasting my time explaining any more.



I do not favor 'open primaries', and neither should any thinking conservative.
They do not work to the advantage of conservatives. They allow Democrats, who lack all sense of fair play, decency and honesty to make mischief and "help" Republicans choose bad candidates, as they did during the 2008 GOP Presidential race. Without cross voting Democrats, McCain would not have won the nomination.

Open-primaries for Presidential primaries should be voided. Votes cast in such would not be accredited in our conventions. Party chairs would be required to demonstrate that only Republicans were involved in selecting the states delegates.

Michael Steele has done NOTHING to fix the abuses of 2008, leaving us even more open to cheating by the loonies in 2012. Democrats will vote for another bad candidate in the GOP primary to defeat any authentic Conservative who has momentum in 2008.

No, dickhead, you claimed that thousands of dems had registered as Reps in the closed primaries. You provided no links to back that up, merely a link to Google.

 

[MeeMie]

No, dickhead, you claimed that thousands of dems had registered as Reps in the closed primaries. You provided no links to back that up, merely a link to Google.

A doubting man should do his own research when he refuses to believe what was explained fully. I merely sent you in the correct direction.

Not only did I demonstrate how the process worked, but also confirmation from my own experience as a Board of Canvassers worker.

When you finally stopped making yourself look like a fool, I figured that you did the research and learned something.

Yet, here you are again spouting off like an imbecile.

 

[Sean]

A doubting man should do his own research when he refuses to believe what was explained fully. I merely sent you in the correct direction.

Not only did I demonstrate how the process worked, but also confirmation from my own experience as a Board of Canvassers worker.

When you finally stopped making yourself look like a fool, I figured that you did the research and learned something.

Yet, here you are again spouting off like an imbecile.

You are utterly full of shit.

 

[MeeMie]

You are utterly full of shit.

Checks watch ... Friday night's boozing continues into the wee hours

Well that explains a lot.

 

[Sean]

Checks watch ... Friday night's boozing continues into the wee hours

Well that explains a lot.

Just bumped a thread for you.
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=638805&highlight=registered

 

[MeeMie]

Here you go douche bag -

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30054861&postcount=165

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30055683&postcount=18

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30055804&postcount=23

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30056412&postcount=56

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30056522&postcount=58



You are the only person insisting that primaries are closed. Even in those cases, as GC attempted to explain to you, it is very simple to change affiliations before and after the primaries.

But just go ahead and have another bubbly.

 

[Sean]

Here you go douche bag - still looking for the first thread.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30055683&postcount=18

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30055804&postcount=23

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30056412&postcount=56

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30056522&postcount=58



You are the only person insisting that primaries are closed. Even in those cases, as GC attempted to explain to you, it is very simple to change affiliations before and after the primaries.

But just go ahead and have another bubbly.

Where did I insist the primaries were closed? I even asked you how McCain managed to lose so many open primaries.

 

[Sean]

Here you go douche bag -

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30054861&postcount=165

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30055683&postcount=18

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30055804&postcount=23

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30056412&postcount=56

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30056522&postcount=58



You are the only person insisting that primaries are closed. Even in those cases, as GC attempted to explain to you, it is very simple to change affiliations before and after the primaries.

But just go ahead and have another bubbly.

And where is the evidence in any of those posts?

 

[MeeMie]

And where is the evidence in any of those posts?

Start here:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30054861&postcount=165

 

[Sean]

Start here:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=30054861&postcount=165

You saying it is evidence? Seriously?

 

[MeeMie]

You saying it is evidence? Seriously?

I'm saying that I told you to do your own research.

Here's an enlightening fact from the 2008 presidential election primaries:

"38% of Democrats crossed-over to vote Republican, compared to 13% of Republicans who crossed-over to vote Democratic."

Imagine that.

 

[Sean]

I'm saying that I told you to do your own research.

Here's an enlightening fact from the 2008 presidential election primaries:

"38% of Democrats crossed-over to vote Republican, compared to 13% of Republicans who crossed-over to vote Democratic."

Imagine that.

In other words, you have no evidence. Again.

 

[MeeMie]

Where did I insist the primaries were closed?

Short memory?

I know, but it's fun to watch him try and defend himself without a c+p. For instance, according to MM, McCain was made Rep candidate because thousands of Dems registered as Republicans in the closed primaries.

Have another bubbly.

 

[Sean]

Short memory?







Have another bubbly.

I didn't see the word "all" in there, did I miss it?

 

[MeeMie]

Here's a good one ..


What are the consequences of permitting crossover voting in presidential primaries? By investigating the extent, sources, and effects of crossover voting in the 2008 primaries, we find, it was common in the 2008 presidential primaries. John McCain was its beneficiary. The extent of crossover varied from primary to primary, depending on the openness of the electoral rules and the electorate’s long-standing party commitments.

 

[Sean]

Here's a good one ..


What are the consequences of permitting crossover voting in presidential primaries? By investigating the extent, sources, and effects of crossover voting in the 2008 primaries, we find, it was common in the 2008 presidential primaries. John McCain was its beneficiary. The extent of crossover varied from primary to primary, depending on the openness of the electoral rules and the electorate’s long-standing party commitments.

Here's a good one:

Extensive investigation has revealed that 98% of all people attending Tea Party rallies are also members of neo-nazi groups.

 

[MeeMie]

Oh my ... in Michigan ...

This -- and the fact that they are his natural constituency -- is why John McCain has been asking Democrats and independents to "cross over" and vote for him in Republican primaries.

 

[MeeMie]

See how easy it is to research, Sean.

Is your pillow calling? You're getting more lame.

 

[Sean]

Sarah Palin said today she will give a blowjob to any Democrat that votes Republican in the presidential election.

 

[MeeMie]

Here's a good one:

Extensive investigation has revealed that 98% of all people attending Tea Party rallies are also members of neo-nazi groups.

Yeah, look at all the neo-nazi groups:

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/04/tax-day-tea-par-3.html

 

[Sean]

You have still provided NO evidence to back up your original claim.

 

[MeeMie]

Sarah Palin said today she will give a blowjob to any Democrat that votes Republican in the presidential election.

Funny you should mention Sarah Palin ... this from a Boston liberal:


Naturally, with so much brain power and so many institutions of higher education here in the Hub, there’s an obvious question to ask: What did we Bostonians learn from Sarah Palin’s romp through town Wednesday for Boston Tea Party II?

Well, here’s what we learned.

We learned that nobody is more intolerant and more illiberal than the angry faux-intellectual “leftists” who still infect Boston politics, media and academia like a nasty case of herpes that won’t go away.

I stopped calling them “liberals” years ago. Today’s so-called “liberals,” especially here in Boston, are nothing but angry leftist ideologues, not true liberals in the classical sense. Their unhinged reaction to Palin is proof.

Consider our lefty friends at the former newspaper turned big-government mouthpiece called The Boston Globe: “Palin has yet to show a shred of intellectual depth, nor much capacity for anything other than superficial analysis,” wrote one Globie Thursday.

Ahh, the profound “Palin is stupid” argument.

Ironic words from a publication that
a) fails to understand the basics of economics;
b) beats the racially divisive drum of identity politics with the wide-eyed lunacy of Keith Moon;
c) is a vapid mouthpiece for failed leftist ideology and ideologues; and
d) whose one tired solution to every social ill is “more government.”
Please, Globe. Learn to balance a budget or spare us the lecture.

But the attacks from the Globe were nothing like the anger we saw at The Weekly Dig, a local outlet here in Boston for crazy lefty causes. It ran artwork labeling Palin a “bitch,” a “moron” and a Nazi.

Apparently, in lefty circles, you’re a Nazi when you advocate less government, individual gun rights, Zionism and Christian values – you know, a complete contradiction of Nazism.

Those clever little lefties must be too bright for me.

Then there were the over-educated and ponytailed “moonbats” (the word for “crazy lefties” that’s common in Boston vernacular). They showed up Wednesday to assault members of an otherwise peaceful Tea Party. One moonbat was wrapped in a Cuban flag with the face of Che Guevara on it. Brilliant! The flag of a socialist hellhole that’s so poor and corrupt that people risk their lives to escape to the U.S. on leaky homemade balsa-wood boats, coupled with the image of a bloodthirsty commie revolutionary.

Personally, I’m still waiting for Michael Moore to defect so that he can go to one of Cuba’s world-class hospitals and get that stomach-stapling operation he so desperately needs. But then again, I’m probably not bright enough to comprehend the tolerant and sophisticated intellectual nuance of the Che-Cuba imagery.

Finally, a lefty friend of mine summed up her side’s feelings in a post on my Facebook page: “We hate Palin because she’s stupid.”

Again, the “stupid” argument.

I had to remind my lefty friend that “hate” conflicts with the alleged leftist ideals of open-mindedness, tolerance and love for our fellow man. It’d be a sad world, I said, if we shared our love only with people of a certain intellect. But as we all know, leftists are tolerant only on paper, not in practice. They’re tolerant only of those who agree with them.

And that’s the appeal of Palin to me: her very existence proves that today’s leftists are intellectual frauds.

Palin, as noted here last week, raised five children, rose from nothing and lived the role of citizen-politician. She fought corruption in both parties in her state. She battled big oil. She’s grown rich. She’s a symbol of female empowerment to millions of open-minded women. She brought home the bacon and fried it up in a pan.

Real liberals admire those qualities in a woman.

But see, Palin, as also noted here last week, didn’t go to Harvard. She hunts. She’s pro life. She deviates from the illiberal leftist dogma about the place of women in society.

So she’s ridiculed, even “hated,” by today’s intolerant leftists who merely pretend to be liberals.

The intellectual fraudulence of the left was on full display here in Boston this week, the city that once prided itself as the Cradle of Liberty, back when the city’s intelligentsia was comprised of real liberals.

In today’s Boston, the not-so-intelligentsia in the Harvard-Beacon Hill-Boston Globe moonbat alliance is comprised only of imaginary fake ”liberals.”

Yes, that’s right, I said it. They’re posers and pretenders.

We know they’re fake because, this week in Boston, stupid Sarah Palin exposed each and every one of them as intellectual frauds.

 

[Sean]

Still no evidence, huh?