D.C. votes for marriage equality

Beco

I'm Not Your Guru
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Posts
57,795
D.C. votes for marriage equality
by Jen Colletta36 mins 37 secs ago | The City Council of Washington, D.C., overwhelmingly approved a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in the district this week.

The council voted 11-2 Dec. 1 to approve legislation introduced in October by openly gay Councilmember David Catania that would extend full marriage rights and benefits to same-sex couples.

As per normal procedure, the council will have to vote a second time on the legislation, which is expected to take place Dec. 15, and the bill will then be sent to D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty, a marriage-equality advocate. Congress then would have a 30-day period to enact a joint resolution disapproving the law, which would have to be signed by President Obama in order to thwart the legislation. Without a Congressional resolution, the bill will automatically become law.

If the bill passes, D.C. will become the first jurisdiction below the Mason-Dixon line to allow same-sex marriage. Such unions are currently legal in Massachusetts, Vermont, Connecticut and Iowa, and will begin in New Hampshire Jan. 1.

“Today’s vote is an important victory not only for the gay and lesbian community but for everyone who supports equal rights,” Catania said in a statement Tuesday. “Gays and lesbians bear every burden of citizenship and are entitled to every benefit and protection that the law allows. Whenever 11 out of 13 councilmembers vote to support any issue, it indicates that there is strong support for the issue among our constituents.”

The only councilmembers opposed to the bill were Yvette Alexander and Marion Barry, the thrice-divorced former mayor of D.C.

The council passed legislation in the spring that allowed D.C. to recognize same-sex marriages performed legally in other jurisdictions.

The marriage-equality measure drew intense national debate in the past few weeks after the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of D.C. announced it would put a stop to its social services if the bill passed.
 
Gotta love the Catholic church: Treat gays as human beings and we'll leave the orphans and homeless to rot on the streets.
 
Youd think the guys in the church would be all about gay marriage anyhow....what with their passion for alter boys and all.
 
I assume this will be voided by Congress. But it's an expression of the will of the people of the District.
 
Gotta love the Catholic church: Treat gays as human beings and we'll leave the orphans and homeless to rot on the streets.

They were opposed because the bill said that anyone receiving city money had to recognize gay marriages - which meant the Church would have to offer health care and the like to the spouses of their gay employees.

There is lots of money to be made on the poor in DC and no doubt one of the Mayor's college roommates will step up and form a company to take the money the Church doesn't want.
 
They were opposed because the bill said that anyone receiving city money had to recognize gay marriages - which meant the Church would have to offer health care and the like to the spouses of their gay employees.

There is lots of money to be made on the poor in DC and no doubt one of the Mayor's college roommates will step up and form a company to take the money the Church doesn't want.

They tried the same shit over here when the civil partnerships act was being debated. One of the few times our yellow bastard government showed some balls and stood up to them.
 
They tried the same shit over here when the civil partnerships act was being debated. One of the few times our yellow bastard government showed some balls and stood up to them.

If you feed at the public trough, you eat what's served. City money always has strings attached, and if the Church doesn't like those strings, they don't have to take the money. I have no doubt some new "charity" will step in and take over the soup kitchens and homeless shelters.
 
Back
Top