Republican House Plan Vs. PelosiCare

Xplorr7

Literotica Guru
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Posts
1,350
The Republican plan does not call for a government insurance plan but rather attempts to reform the system by creating high-risk insurance pools, allowing people to purchase health insurance policies across state lines and instituting medical malpractice reforms.

Cost - according to Congressional Budget Office (CBO):
GOP Bill $61 billion Vs. $1.05 trillion cost for PelosiCare.

CBO additionally found that the Republican provision to reform medical malpractice liability would result in $41 billion in savings and increase [government] revenues by $13 billion by reducing the cost of private health insurance plans.”

The report found that rates would drop by 7-to-10 percent for small business, and by 5-to-8 percent for the individual market, where it can also be difficult to find affordable policies.

The Congressional Budget Office Wednesday night released its cost analysis of the Republican health care plan and found that it would reduce health care premiums and cut the deficit by $68 billion over ten years.

What’s in it? Well, some popular, noncontroversial items:

The Republican plan has adopted some of the more modest Democratic provisions. It too would make it easier for young adults to remain on their parents’ health policies. It also would end the controversial insurance practices of imposing annual or lifetime limits on benefits and of canceling coverage after a policyholder becomes sick.

And rather than give more power to the federal government to address the nation’s healthcare problems, the Republican plan looks to states, market forces and individuals.

Their bill would provide aid to the states to form “high-risk” insurance pools that would cover people — including those with preexisting conditions who cannot get coverage through their jobs or in the individual market. The GOP bill also would provide incentive grants for states that reduce premiums and the ranks of the uninsured.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/category/contentions/page/2

Please consider this vs. the government taking over 17% of the US economy.

Btw - like how is the H1N1 vaccine is going (aka Obama's Katrina)??
 
CBO says GOP plan covers 3 million of the uninsured, leaving 52 million to continue to be uninsured.
 
CBO says GOP plan covers 3 million of the uninsured, leaving 52 million to continue to be uninsured.

Even Obama had to admit the number was more like 30 and Nancy's plan doesn't cover all of them; that's the pre-planned mission-creep...
 
CBO says GOP plan covers 3 million of the uninsured, leaving 52 million to continue to be uninsured.

52 million? You need to check in with your supreme Kool Aid server. Even he had the legendary uninsured number at 30 million last time the fictitious number came up. (Remember when he had to remove the number of illegals for political purposes?)

PS - if Obama and his cronies cared in a non-political way about the uninsured, why are they waiting until 2013 for the blessed reform plan to take effect?? Waiting that is, with no provision for "all those dying in the street every day due to no insurance?"
 
52 million? You need to check in with your supreme Kool Aid server. Even he had the legendary uninsured number at 30 million last time the fictitious number came up. (Remember when he had to remove the number of illegals for political purposes?)

PS - if Obama and his cronies cared in a non-political way about the uninsured, why are they waiting until 2013 for the blessed reform plan to take effect?? Waiting that is, with no provision for "all those dying in the street every day due to no insurance?"

Make up your mind. Do you care about the uninsured or not?
 
CBO says GOP plan covers 3 million of the uninsured, leaving 52 million to continue to be uninsured.

3 million isn't even enough to cover the uninsured in Texas alone.

Not to mention that one of the most important facets of health reform (eliminating the ability for insurance to be denied due to pre-existing conditions) is not even IN this excuse for a plan.
 
Then again, it doesn't reward the tort crowd the way Nancy's does...




I mean Obama's.




It's Obama's plan ;) ;) *nudge* *nudge*

(... at least until it goes bad, then it's ALL Nancy's... )
 
Drixx, you're even dumber than I thought you were. Why don't you break down the demographics of those 54 million for us? Maybe you'll learn something.
 
Drixx, you're even dumber than I thought you were. Why don't you break down the demographics of those 54 million for us? Maybe you'll learn something.

Why don't you, Miles?
 
Drixx, you're even dumber than I thought you were. Why don't you break down the demographics of those 54 million for us? Maybe you'll learn something.

Let's see, they're people and there's 54 million of them.
 
We have to find that one that explodes the myth of having an army of uninsured. A large number of them were people who were uninsured for just a short period between jobs. Of course that number who are without jobs and without insurance is growing now that we have the disasterous democrats business-crushing policies in place.
 
The lead post for this thread is really remarkable. Not something you find in the mainstream press, but real nevertheless.
 
The Republican plan does not call for a government insurance plan but rather attempts to reform the system by creating high-risk insurance pools, allowing people to purchase health insurance policies across state lines and instituting medical malpractice reforms.

Cost - according to Congressional Budget Office (CBO):
GOP Bill $61 billion Vs. $1.05 trillion cost for PelosiCare.

CBO additionally found that the Republican provision to reform medical malpractice liability would result in $41 billion in savings and increase [government] revenues by $13 billion by reducing the cost of private health insurance plans.”

The report found that rates would drop by 7-to-10 percent for small business, and by 5-to-8 percent for the individual market, where it can also be difficult to find affordable policies.

The Congressional Budget Office Wednesday night released its cost analysis of the Republican health care plan and found that it would reduce health care premiums and cut the deficit by $68 billion over ten years.

What’s in it? Well, some popular, noncontroversial items:

The Republican plan has adopted some of the more modest Democratic provisions. It too would make it easier for young adults to remain on their parents’ health policies. It also would end the controversial insurance practices of imposing annual or lifetime limits on benefits and of canceling coverage after a policyholder becomes sick.

And rather than give more power to the federal government to address the nation’s healthcare problems, the Republican plan looks to states, market forces and individuals.

Their bill would provide aid to the states to form “high-risk” insurance pools that would cover people — including those with preexisting conditions who cannot get coverage through their jobs or in the individual market. The GOP bill also would provide incentive grants for states that reduce premiums and the ranks of the uninsured.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/category/contentions/page/2

Please consider this vs. the government taking over 17% of the US economy.

Btw - like how is the H1N1 vaccine is going (aka Obama's Katrina)??

Wow - you would think these differences would be publicized better. Significant.

Interesting - if snide - comment about H1N1 vaccine.
 
Back
Top