bitslinger
Really Experienced
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2003
- Posts
- 205
My humble suggestion is simply that Lit may be coloring the experience of readers by presenting a niche ad in an unrelated story. The ad in question basically says "It's okay, she's only my stepdaughter".
I realize that Lit needs to make money by selling ads. I am a died-in-the-wool capitalist and I know that web sites take money to run. However, I question the desirability of putting niche (dare I say possibly socially frowned apon niche) ads above stories that have no tags related to it.
Before authors of that type of story get up in arms, I have no desire to censor people writing or reading any story (provided everyone's of a legal age). I even realize that the actors in the advertised product are not even related in that way.
I just want to know if authors feel that ads might color a reader's view of a story before they've even read the first line. How do other authors feel about this?
Thanks
I realize that Lit needs to make money by selling ads. I am a died-in-the-wool capitalist and I know that web sites take money to run. However, I question the desirability of putting niche (dare I say possibly socially frowned apon niche) ads above stories that have no tags related to it.
Before authors of that type of story get up in arms, I have no desire to censor people writing or reading any story (provided everyone's of a legal age). I even realize that the actors in the advertised product are not even related in that way.
I just want to know if authors feel that ads might color a reader's view of a story before they've even read the first line. How do other authors feel about this?
Thanks
Last edited: