Is sex better for women?

[newtoforums]

http://www.femalemultiple.org/index.php?topic=47.0

http://www.malemultiple.org/index.php?topic=34.0

http://www.malemultiple.org/index.php?topic=130.0

Also worthy of mentioning is that women barely initiate, don't really desire men and foreplay is more about them ad that men can't really relax and let go during orgasms or get multiple orgasms from women. It'd be rare to find a woman who gave more than she took.

Well at least men have more nerves in their sexual organs.

 

[pinky_love]

Also worthy of mentioning is that w...so be able to have multiple orgasms:confused:

 

[newtoforums]

What does number of nerves have to do with multiple orgasms? The penis has 4000 nerves, the clitoris has 8000 nerves. But the foreskin has 10000-20000 nerves.

 

[pinky_love]

well surely the more feeling you have then the more sensitive it is and the more pleasure you would get but maybe im wrong im not a guy so i wouldnt know

 

[newtoforums]

Not really. because uncircumcised men have 24000 nerves compared to 4000 for those with no foreskins. you think men with foreskins have 6 times as many orgasms?

 

[newtoforums]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1949087.stm

 

[pinky_love]

Not really. because uncircumcised men have 24000 nerves compared to 4000 for those with no foreskins. you think men with foreskins have 6 times as many orgasms?

im no good at maths

 

[Eilan]

im no good at maths

If you look over the OP's previous threads, you'll see that he's an inept, small-dicked troll. It's completely pointless to attempt to engage him in any sort of worthwhile discussion.

 

[newtoforums]

If you look over the OP's previous threads, you'll see that he's an inept, small-dicked troll. It's completely pointless to attempt to engage him in any sort of worthwhile discussion.

Aww you hurt my feelings I don't care what dumb whores like you think. Its completely pointless to even consider your opinion valid.

 

[fire_breeze]

http://www.femalemultiple.org/index.php?topic=47.0

http://www.malemultiple.org/index.php?topic=34.0

http://www.malemultiple.org/index.php?topic=130.0

Also worthy of mentioning is that women barely initiate, don't really desire men and foreplay is more about them ad that men can't really relax and let go during orgasms or get multiple orgasms from women. It'd be rare to find a woman who gave more than she took.

Well at least men have more nerves in their sexual organs.

WHAT?!

 

[silverwhisper]

there's a reason i never reply to your threads, newtoforums. it's b/c you post leading questions supported by dubious "data", and you give off a tremendous sense of "i have an agenda!"

ed

 

[VelvetDarkness]

Also worthy of mentioning is that women barely initiate, don't really desire men and foreplay is more about them ad that men can't really relax and let go during orgasms or get multiple orgasms from women. It'd be rare to find a woman who gave more than she took.

Once again, you're deluded by the notion that your sorry experience of sex is incontrovertible fact. No amount of 'research' or 'discussion' is going to alter the fact that your patently a shit fuck with a gargantuan chip on his shoulder.

And I bet you still wonder why womankind isn't baying as one to suck your cock.

 

[Bandit58]

It'd be rare to find a woman who gave more than she took.

PFFFFT

 

[newtoforums]

Once again, you're deluded by the notion that your sorry experience of sex is incontrovertible fact. No amount of 'research' or 'discussion' is going to alter the fact that your patently a shit fuck with a gargantuan chip on his shoulder.

And I bet you still wonder why womankind isn't baying as one to suck your cock.

I always wonder why dumb bitches like you answer if you have nothing valuable to say. Nothing will change the fact that everything you post is useless. And your last point is stupid. I never said anything of the sort. But what would someone like you know? You're the one with the chip on your shoulder. You're the one lying about what I wrote and reacting with emotion. I didn't expect more from you though.

And your previous threads prove my assertions right. Now go insult someone else so you feel better about your pathetic life.

 

[Palba_Noruda]

I had thirty orgasms in the last minute and my partner had way fewer. Clearly sex is better for me. Ding!

 

[Eilan]

Also worthy of mentioning is that women barely notice me, don't really desire me, and I've never experienced foreplay because self-sex is my only sexual experience and I can't really relax and let go because it's so hard for me to jerk off and keep my head up my ass at the same time. It'd be rare to find a noninflatable human woman who actually wants to have sex with me.

Well at least I have a pillow to hump.

Fixed your post.

 

[Miss_Misaki]

I'm reminded of the Greek personage Tiresias, who was called upon by the gods to determine who enjoys sex more:

"Tiresias was once out on a walk, when he saw two snakes mating. He sat there watching for hours, when the snakes sensed his presence. Since they did not want to be disturbed, they attacked him. Tiresias managed to kill the female, and at the same moment he killed her, he turned into a woman.

As a woman Tiresias became a prostitute of great fame for seven years. Then, one day, the episode with the snake was repeated, but this time Tiresias killed the male, and so turned back into a man.

When Zeus and Hera had a disagreement on which sex enjoys the most pleasure during intercourse they decided to let Tiresias judge, since he had experienced both. Hera insisted men enjoy sex more, while Zeus claimed the opposite. Tiresias then said, that if sexual pleasure could be put on a scale from one to ten, then men were at one, and women at three times three.
This angered Hera so much she blinded Tiresias, but Zeus gave him inner sight (wisdom and the ability to see the future) and extended his life with seven generations."

That was the Greeks' take on the age-old question, I guess.

 

[JohnMBrowning]

Reluctant to post on what may be a troll thread, but I have an opinion, completely unbacked by anything empirical (almost by definition so, since only Tiresias knows for sure).

I think better for women. The many orgasms in a sex session is one huge component. For men sex involves a lot of grit-your-teeth, hold-back, "endurance tests." (Except this test is not at all grim. ) I am very jealous that women can relax and just come again and again, with the same pleasure potential each time.

Additionally, I think sex for women is much more "multidimensional," and engages their entire body (skin, to be specific). That makes the experience much more sensual, literally, and following from that, in the psychological sense also. For men it's "one-dimensional" - it's all about the dick.

A sidebar on that one - nipples. I've read descriptions that it's like a live wire between nipple and clit. For a man that's like, "Huh?" We can't imagine that.

Heinlein also thought it was better for women - some here will have read I Will Fear No Evil. A sci-fi Tiresias.

This part is metaphorical: I think this is compensation for the fact that women bear the burden of the consequences of sex - pregnancy, birth, and primary care at least for the first year or two (baby at your breast). Certainly for many women those things have their own compensations, but on their face they dangerous, painful and uncomfortable.

Then there is menstruation - the fuss and muss, the cramps, etc. etc. Bottom line is, the least nature could do is compensate with great sex. (Of course nature is a fascist and couldn't care less - I said this was metaphorical.)

 

[newtoforums]

Fixed your post.

Also worthy of mentioning is Eilan is a selfish bitch, who insults others when someone makes a valid point and is selfish in bed. Whats with all the idiots responding? It'd be rare for her to use her brain. If only she had one. At least you have your rabbit. Get used to it.

 

[ples]

Let me rephrase - Is sex better for me than for a man? Yes, that is correct - Wait!! what if the man is a bad lover? What if he can't get you off? Never mind, if it isn't good for me how could it be good for him?

 

[Palba_Noruda]

I think better for women. The many orgasms in a sex session is one huge component. For men sex involves a lot of grit-your-teeth, hold-back, "endurance tests." (Except this test is not at all grim. ) I am very jealous that women can relax and just come again and again, with the same pleasure potential each time.

I'm a man. I like skin on skin. The whole sex thing sometimes is a fear of "will I come?"

I always do. But still the fear is there.

 

[emap]

New if you don't want to be insulted perhaps you should try not insulting everyone else.

So I'm going to point something out, sex isn't all about the freaking orgasms, doesn't matter how many either person has. Yes some women can have multiple orgasms during one session of sex, i'm one of the lucky ones even. Trust me, I have done multiple orgasms and hated the sex, because all the guy was doing was shoving me down, spreading my legs and fucking me, never played with my breasts or kissed me or nothing. He figured he was doing it right because I came a couple times.

I never saw him again, at least not on purpose. Sex is about the closeness, the intimacy, the pleasure of the actual pumping. Good greif if sex was all about the orgasm do you really think women would be complaining about 5 minute men?

New here's a tip, before you use the forums again, grow up, grow a spine, get a girlfriend and stop being a clueless virgin. Heck rent a girlfriend, probably would take that anyway.

 

[NippleMuncher]

there's a reason i never reply to your threads, newtoforums. it's b/c you post leading questions supported by dubious "data", and you give off a tremendous sense of "i have an agenda!"

ed

The very definition of a troll, no?

Maybe the reason NewToForums can't get off with a woman. besides the fact that he's a troll, is that he's an insensitive prick?

 

[newtoforums]

The very definition of a troll, no?

Maybe the reason NewToForums can't get off with a woman. besides the fact that he's a troll, is that he's an insensitive prick?

No. I never said anything of the sort. Learn to read idiot. I think you're the insensitive bitch.

 

[newtoforums]

New if you don't want to be insulted perhaps you should try not insulting everyone else.

So I'm going to point something out, sex isn't all about the freaking orgasms, doesn't matter how many either person has. Yes some women can have multiple orgasms during one session of sex, i'm one of the lucky ones even. Trust me, I have done multiple orgasms and hated the sex, because all the guy was doing was shoving me down, spreading my legs and fucking me, never played with my breasts or kissed me or nothing. He figured he was doing it right because I came a couple times.

I never saw him again, at least not on purpose. Sex is about the closeness, the intimacy, the pleasure of the actual pumping. Good greif if sex was all about the orgasm do you really think women would be complaining about 5 minute men?

New here's a tip, before you use the forums again, grow up, grow a spine, get a girlfriend and stop being a clueless virgin. Heck rent a girlfriend, probably would take that anyway.

Really? Are you blind or are you an idiot? Who did I insult? The others threw the insults and I gave it back to them. Maybe those are too weak and cowardly and need to insult in groups (like you) shouldn't insult if you cry when someone responds.