Zeb_Carter
.-- - ..-.
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Posts
- 20,584
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it only covered Democrats, it would be better.![]()
follow link for more)House Democrats on Tuesday rolled out a far-reaching $1.5 trillion plan that for the first time would make health care a right and a responsibility for all Americans, with medical providers, employers and the wealthiest picking up most of the tab.
The federal government would be responsible for ensuring that every person, regardless of income or the state of their health, has access to an affordable insurance plan. Individuals and employers would have new obligations to get or offer coverage, or face hefty penalties....(
You wanna take a peek at my hospital bills?
That's a red herring. Estimates are that tort reform would save less than 2%.It isn't the doctors that make it terribly expensive, though they do contribute some, but it is run-amok tort law in the US that creates a lot of unnecessary expenses via insurance for practicing medicine. Have that removed and good chunk of the bill comes off right there.
That's a red herring. Estimates are that tort reform would save less than 2%.
AMICUS
There's a frantic/hysterical tone in the haste to get this thing made law. The tone reminds me of contractors scrambling for cash to make payroll and pay suppliers. Something is up and we dont know what it is.
Someone pointed out that this really isn't an issue between conservatives and liberals, but between Insurance companies (and those they've bought and paid for) and the rest of us.
Personally, all I want is the same thing those voting on these bills get. Their government funded heath plan. If they don't think that's a good idea, then they should go off it themselves and buy into an insurance plan like the rest of us. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
And, no, Zeb, I won't click on that. I don't read propaganda.
Hard to say. I found estimates of $35-50B/yr of 'charity care', but the impact on peoples' lives and economic productivity is far higher. One study estimates the net economic value (i.e., gain) of covering the uninsured to be $65-135B/yr.What of those that don't pay?
Edit: I meant to ask, what is the contribution of costs from the patients that can't pay?
* According to a recent report, the United States has $480 billion in excess spending each year in comparison to Western European nations that have universal health insurance coverage. The costs are mainly associated with excess administrative costs and poorer quality of care.14
* The United States spends six times more per capita on the administration of the health care system than its peer Western European nations.14
Just like every other bill this Administration has wanted, it has to rushed and declared a crisis so nobody can read the whole thing before voting. Lord only knows what kind of crap is hidden in there.
Originally Posted by DesertPirate
//Just like every other bill this Administration has wanted, it has to rushed and declared a crisis so nobody can read the whole thing before voting. Lord only knows what kind of crap is hidden in there. //
jbj Based on 200+ years of American history as precedent, we're buying a trillion dollars worth of tuition from the Washington School of Hard Knocks.
what exactly does the right propose, besides saying "no problem", and 'the market will provide.' [leaving aside tort reform, for the moment].
jbj, what's a good fascist/paleo solution to the healthcare prioblem (one part of which is the number of uninsured, or underinsured.)?
PS: what's stunning to me is the US's 'exceptionalism'; the problem of healthcare has been tackled, with varying degrees of success, by all the advanced countries. no American leaders are looking at them, or at least metnioning it! why is not an exemplar or pattern to be found among these countries, some very friendly to capital? what's so damn unique about the US's issues in this area?
==
zeb, thanks for the chart. there's a degree of truth in it; the democrats, besides having to minimize exposure to republican "spendthrift" and "socialist" critiques, have to placate hoardes of lobbyists, hence the programs are melanges, cobbled together like Bush's plans for drug coverage.
You wanna take a peek at my hospital bills?