Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click the smilie guys. It's a link.
That's horrid. I can't imagine why someone would do such a thing.
Yeah, I will. If there is any updates.What the hell happened? And why on earth do the newspaper think that that's a good article to advertise the joys of 'Australia' (the brand) on?
I mean, if the girl was limp, had something already happened? Why on earth would the man do something that was so obviously against the grain? Starrkers - keep us updated will you?
x
V
Just gonna say: I don't think it's silly to "rant" against those that those that should have never been near children or against the "imagined" phedophile. Been around to many of those "So called" imaginary one's that seemed to be the epitome of society and in the dark were monsters.Selena - do not follow this post.
It is silly to rant against troubled souls who should never have been allowed near children. At times I think we wet our panties too much over imagined pedophiles and fail to protect children who are in danger of even worse abuse from ignorant, ill or weak or neglectful adults.
Starrkers's story seems impossible to pre-guess, but selena's and the two cases here are so different and upsetting;
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article5140511.ece
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...-family-where-children-equalled-benefits.html
Sexual abuse of children is sickening and unforgiveable, but haven't we, in a red-misted attack on the Catholic church and pedophiles in general, taken our attention away from the more prosaic task of having social services that police and protect the young from 'dangerous' , i.e. inadequate, parents.
The death of a child breaks my heart.
The easily preventable death of a child because of incompetence by those who are meant to protect children (social workers, home health workers, etc., as in the first link in lloyd's post) pisses me off.
As for the first link in this thread, I hope that the little girl was unaware of what was happening, and that her mother and brothers will get the help they need to cope with her death. And part of me feels "there but for the grace of god..."
Edited to add: Sadangel, hugs.
Selena - do not follow this post.
It is silly to rant against troubled souls who should never have been allowed near children. At times I think we wet our panties too much over imagined pedophiles and fail to protect children who are in danger of even worse abuse from ignorant, ill or weak or neglectful adults.
Starrkers's story seems impossible to pre-guess, but selena's and the two cases here are so different and upsetting;
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article5140511.ece
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...-family-where-children-equalled-benefits.html
Sexual abuse of children is sickening and unforgiveable, but haven't we, in a red-misted attack on the Catholic church and pedophiles in general, taken our attention away from the more prosaic task of having social services that police and protect the young from 'dangerous' , i.e. inadequate, parents.
That's certainly how it looks. I just saw an article saying he and his estranged wife had just reached agreement on a shared custody arrangement giving him more time with his children.I'm not excusing what the guy did in any way, and I'm sure I'll get flamed for this, but here goes:
Yes, what he did was horrible, but from what the story says, he was a model parent until some kind of psychotic break or something similar occurred. He apparently wasn't an abuser, wasn't some kind of monster, but a normal parent who had something go horribly wrong inside. He didn't try to hide what he did in the least.
I hate witch hunts of any kind. What he did was terrible, but I do feel for him if what the article says is true, and he's just a normal guy that had something go wrong in his head. If that's true, there but for the grace of god go all of us with children.