I was surprised twice by Wal-Mart today

SeaCat

Hey, my Halo is smoking
Joined
Sep 23, 2003
Posts
15,378
This afternoon my wife and I headed down to the local Wal-Mart. We needed new front tires on the car and they had the best prices.

I picked out the tires I wanted, a couple of Goodyears marked at $60.00 each. I carried them to the counter and talked with the clerk there as he types in the work order. I wanted the tires on the front and yes I did want them balanced. I opted for the road hazard. I was told it would take roughly half an hour which was fine by us.

When we came back here was the same guy standing at the counter. He told us the car was ready. I glanced outside at the car and saw the new tires on the front just like I wanted. He rang up the sale and the total came to quite a bit more than I had expected. I asked about this and he started talking about charges for this and charges for that, but none of them would have added up to the extra amount of well over one hundred dollars so I asked to see the work order. He started acting offended so I asked to see the manager. He started telling me I didn't need to see the manager and threatened to call for security. Now I was more than suspicious and told him to go ahead and call for security.

Well he didn't call security but one of his co-workers did when I demanded they do so. The Manager was also called. The original clerk started trying to fade out and I asked him where he thought he was going. By this time several more people had shown up, including more store workers.

When the Manager and Security showed up the clerk started in by telling them I was trying to rip the store off by not paying. When it finally came my turn to put in a word I asked the manager to pull the work order and check it to find out what had caused the extra fees. He did this and told me there wasn't anything wrong with the work order. I had asked for four new tires and I had four new tires. I looked at him and told him to look at my car and count the new tires on it. He looked at me then went out to the car and looked at the tires. When he came back in he wasn't a happy camper. It was obvious that the rear tires weren't new. He asked me how many tires I had ordered and I told him as he looked at the clerk. He asked me to wait a minute as he took care of a couple of things then vanished with the clerk and a couple of guys from Security.

When he came back he stopped to talk with one of the mechanics in the bay then came over and started working on the computer. When he was done the right price came up on the display. He appologised for what had happened then told me what the store was doing to remedie the problem.

The clerk was fired and was in the process of being arrested for theft. (They would also start an investigation to see if he had done this before.)

The store was also charging me only for the replaced front tires even though we would have to wait because they were also replacing my rear tires at no charge. (I did protest they didn't need to do this.)

So now the clerk sits in jail and my car sits out front with four new tires. I'm morethan happy about this.

Cat
 
...

The store was also charging me only for the replaced front tires even though we would have to wait because they were also replacing my rear tires at no charge. (I did protest they didn't need to do this.)

So now the clerk sits in jail and my car sits out front with four new tires. I'm more than happy about this.

Cat
You know what the rear tyres were like, while I don't, but if it were me, I'd have wanted the opportunity to comment before they decided how to compensate me - that should have been an offer, not an imposition.

Sure, two extra new tires for free is good, but merely because that was what the fraudulent charge concerned doesn't make it the most useful compensation. Could be that, say, a new spare might have done you more good while costing them less.

My point isn't that they ended up doing you bad, but talking to you first could have done you better (e.g. a voucher for new rear tyres when you actually needed them).

Nevertheless, they get points for trying to do good.

To me, they'd have got lots more points from asking how you'd prefer to be compensated.

Edited to say: kudos to you for not taking it lying down - and (again) to the manager for the same.
 
Last edited:
Good choice to put additional new ones on the rear rather than just comp the fronts, though fifty5 has a point about asking you what you'd prefer.

And not the smartest of dudes running the scam.
 
Well, it sounds like you're happier with Wal-Mart than this would-be Santa was:

Barry Goldberg said a nice gesture went unappreciated at the Wal-Mart Supercenter at Lisbon Landing over the weekend. He said he purchased $1,300 worth of $10 gift cards to Wal-Mart with the intention of dressing as Santa Claus and giving them out in front of the store. He said it wasn’t a gimmick it or stunt. He said he was just moved to do something nice to make the holiday brighter.
But his gesture of kindness as the Secret Santa didn’t last long.

“The next thing I knew, they turned to me and said, ‘You have to leave the store. You can’t do this here. You’re soliciting,’” Goldberg said. “I said, ‘I’m not soliciting anything. I’m giving.’”

The out-of-work mortgage lending executive said he still has 44 gift cards left from his weekend adventure. “They asked me, ‘Well, where did you get these cards?’” he said. “’I bought them from your store 20 minutes ago.’ ‘Well, what are you doing?’ (they asked). I said, “I’m giving out gift cards. It’s the holidays. The right thing to do is to give, isn’t it?’”

In a statement to Eyewitness News, Wal-Mart states,” While we appreciate the customer’s patronage, we understand that he was interrupting the flow of foot traffic in the store’s vestibule.”

Goldberg said he was contacted by Target and was told he could bring the cards to a Target store and swap them out and pass them out there.
 
You know what the rear tyres were like, while I don't, but if it were me, I'd have wanted the opportunity to comment before they decided how to compensate me - that should have been an offer, not an imposition.

Sure, two extra new tires for free is good, but merely because that was what the fraudulent charge concerned doesn't make it the most useful compensation. Could be that, say, a new spare might have done you more good while costing them less.

My point isn't that they ended up doing you bad, but talking to you first could have done you better (e.g. a voucher for new rear tyres when you actually needed them).

Nevertheless, they get points for trying to do good.

To me, they'd have got lots more points from asking how you'd prefer to be compensated.

Edited to say: kudos to you for not taking it lying down - and (again) to the manager for the same.

They did good by me and I'm not going to complain. The rears did need replacing, just not as bad as the fronts.

Hell I told them they didn't need to do that, I was just happy they arrested the guy.

Cat
 
They did good by me and I'm not going to complain. The rears did need replacing, just not as bad as the fronts.

Hell I told them they didn't need to do that, I was just happy they arrested the guy.

Cat
As long as you are happy, so am I. It just seemed to me they could have been even better at no greater cost - but as before, that may well be because I wasn't there - maybe they did better than it seems at second hand.

Still, as I already said, kudos to all that deserve it: you and the store.
 
Hey Cat,
Does that horse shoe you have wedged squarely up your rump ever feel uncomfortable? lol
I'm only kidding, good for you by getting the idiot out of the retail industry and good for Wally World for seeing your imposition!
C
 
Hey Cat,
Does that horse shoe you have wedged squarely up your rump ever feel uncomfortable? lol
I'm only kidding, good for you by getting the idiot out of the retail industry and good for Wally World for seeing your imposition!
C

Actually I have it hung in another place.:devil:

Cat
 
You know what the rear tyres were like, while I don't, but if it were me, I'd have wanted the opportunity to comment before they decided how to compensate me - that should have been an offer, not an imposition.

Sure, two extra new tires for free is good, but merely because that was what the fraudulent charge concerned doesn't make it the most useful compensation. Could be that, say, a new spare might have done you more good while costing them less.

My point isn't that they ended up doing you bad, but talking to you first could have done you better (e.g. a voucher for new rear tyres when you actually needed them).

Nevertheless, they get points for trying to do good.

To me, they'd have got lots more points from asking how you'd prefer to be compensated.

Edited to say: kudos to you for not taking it lying down - and (again) to the manager for the same.

Actually, he now has three spare tires - the ones that were on the rear and the one that was already in the trunk. :cool:
 
Holy Shit. The ghost of Sam Walton must still have a hold on some of his "associates". Good job for not bending under the threat of security.
 
CAT

You'd be amazed at the scams customers and employees pull at WAL-MART (AND EVERYWHERE ELSE). Even the managers do it.

In your case, WAL-MART didnt pay for the compensation...the employees paid for the compensation. WAL-MART deducts theft, injuries, damage, etc from the money they use for employee bonuses.
 
CAT

You'd be amazed at the scams customers and employees pull at WAL-MART (AND EVERYWHERE ELSE). Even the managers do it.

In your case, WAL-MART didnt pay for the compensation...the employees paid for the compensation. WAL-MART deducts theft, injuries, damage, etc from the money they use for employee bonuses.

That last is good. If an employee tries to rip off customers, it gives the other employees incentive to end the scams, rather than shrug and say, 'It aint my problem.'
 
Was the department manager arrested, too? He'd have to be in on the scam for any individuals to benefit. The manager handles the money for the dep't., not the clerks. My wife used to manage a Wal Mart photo lab, and had to account for all the transactions.

This would be a bigger charge of fraud, not just theft. Without bigger fish getting arrested, this clerk was just a scapegoat to protect the truly guilty parties.
 
At the local WAL-MART one of the assistant managers was in on a scam. An accomplice bought a cheap tv and the assistant manager personally took a large HDTV out to the car for him....to get around the Greeter.
 
Back
Top