Liar
now with 17% more class
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Posts
- 43,715
If I may offer a crackpot theory, I believe one of the reasons for that is the mass introduction of television. It made memorable, visual icons out of the voices on the radio.It never ceases to amaze me that music from 40 years ago can still sound as good today as it did in 1968. People who were great then -- Hendrix, the Beatles, the Stones, Aretha, Janis Joplin -- are still great. Timeless.
That's as if, in 1968, we'd played Charleston music from the 20's and found meaning in it. In a lot of ways, things have changed less in the last 40 years than they did in the previous 40.
That, and there were simply some really good acts that could take advantage of that. The US and UK mainly, had a cultural climate around that time that was really nurturing to talent and artistry.
But I must disagree with you on the issue of change. You're comparing rock and rnb to charleston, when you should compare it to gospel and blues. The difference between a Dylan in the 60's and a Leadbelly in the 20's is not that monumental. And at the same time, some of the things you hear today that can draw crowds of thousands to concerts, wouldn't even be considered music in the 60's. (Although I don't think for instance that a lot of Floyd would be considered music either in the earlier days of Elvis.)