So, you say that one of your limits is "animals"......

Do not want.

And M with a file and a pumice that I own works great when we have the time.
 
Is there not some kind of amazonian fish that swims up your little John Tohmas and attaches it self with barbs?
Hedgehogs!:D
 
Crickets don't bite or sting, do they?

That's very different than bees or ants.

Apparently they do. I didn't think so but I have seen a few posts and videos etc., of people who use them regularly and come out with quite a mess of bites and subsequent swelling.

Catalina:catroar:
 
Not to repress anyone, but . . .

People who are not allergic to bees and stuff might be if they get stung several times. If you decide to do this, pay attention to the signs of anaphylactic shock.

Symptoms develop rapidly, often within seconds or minutes. They may include the following:

* Abdominal pain or cramping
* Abnormal (high-pitched) breathing sounds
* Anxiety
* Confusion
* Cough
* Diarrhea
* Difficulty breathing
* Fainting, light-headedness, dizziness
* Hives, itchiness
* Nasal congestion
* Nausea, vomiting
* Sensation of feeling the heart beat (palpitations)
* Skin redness
* Slurred speech
* Wheezing
 
So, when is it appropriate or OK to include animals, and, how would you do it?

Shockingly, people around here tend to like to answer this one for themselves. :rolleyes:

I personally find any activity in which I have to trap an animal for my own shits and giggles to not comport with my own ethics. But that's just me. The other day, I saw a picture of a display that involved bending up a bunch of books for show, and I didn't like it at all either. I was raised to treat books with respect, and it stuck. Plenty of people think that's stupid, or who gives a fuck about ants, I could tell the ant wanted it, blah blah blah.
 
I'm kinda in the same boat as itw. If they can't consent, and animals or insects can, then it's probably going to really bother me. On the other hand Master once told me an elaborate story about a squid..and there were some pics we saw online....:eek:
 
I'm with you itw. I would feel the same about the books too, btw.

You bibliophile!

I'm kinda in the same boat as itw. If they can't consent, and animals or insects can, then it's probably going to really bother me. On the other hand Master once told me an elaborate story about a squid..and there were some pics we saw online....:eek:

Lol, what is it with this board and squid? I do prefer the tentacle ones to the rings when I am eating dinner.

Speaking of which, it's not strictly about consent for me, because obviously that squid did not consent to my enjoyment of its yumminess.
 
It's not a high minded consent issue.

It's that I'm not spending my time digging anthills or trapping paper wasps.
 
I so don't want to revisit our last bestial--it's animal erotica!-- thread because I left it wanting to stick teeny little push pins in all of your asses. Slowly. And without warning. In a cold shower. With no chocolate.

AND ONLY BUD LIGHT TO DRINK. :eek::eek::eek:
 
OK, in *most* cases that is understandable.

But, one suggestion i have heard is putting ants or bees in a jar, than, placing that jar around the male genitals.

And, this article prompts for more ideas:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/lifestyle/371791_fishpedicure23.html


So, when is it appropriate or OK to include animals, and, how would you do it?

I doubt this would work how you expect. As a kid I would put bees in with ants, and they just fight and kill each other.

Kind of neat to watch, perfect ratio is about 5 ants to 1 bee, if I recall correctly.
 
I doubt this would work how you expect. As a kid I would put bees in with ants, and they just fight and kill each other.

um, *i* am not expecting it to work, since i wouldn't agree to it ;)

Plus, you read the wrong conjunction. i said "or"
 
No animals...under any circumstances....even bees and ants...

I have always been in the mind set that once you have to bring animals in for play that it is time to call it quits.

I'm gagging (and not the good kind) just thinking about it...and now I am recalling pictures of this girl from my high school who did somethings with a dog....ewww...:eek:
 
Shockingly, people around here tend to like to answer this one for themselves. :rolleyes:

I personally find any activity in which I have to trap an animal for my own shits and giggles to not comport with my own ethics. But that's just me. The other day, I saw a picture of a display that involved bending up a bunch of books for show, and I didn't like it at all either. I was raised to treat books with respect, and it stuck. Plenty of people think that's stupid, or who gives a fuck about ants, I could tell the ant wanted it, blah blah blah.

Ditto.

It's not a high minded consent issue.

It's that I'm not spending my time digging anthills or trapping paper wasps.

There's that, too.

Not an issue of consent here, an issue of "ew, ants."

Especially that. I detest ants.

I so don't want to revisit our last bestial--it's animal erotica!-- thread because I left it wanting to stick teeny little push pins in all of your asses. Slowly. And without warning. In a cold shower. With no chocolate.

AND ONLY BUD LIGHT TO DRINK. :eek::eek::eek:

:eek: OMG That is so sick and wrong. *hides*
 
I read a fabulous piece of Victorian erotica a year or two ago, in which some sweet young man was feminized, as he had requested (complete with stockings, garters, corset, frilly afternoon dress, gloves, high heeled boots, hair dressed, etc). He was then sat in a dainty lady's chair, arms and legs bound to the armrests/legs of the chair, and glass boxes (with a small opening/rubber stopper) were attached to his hands and feet. The ladies surrounding him teased and tormented (humiliated) him until he was quite aroused, then released fleas into the glass boxes and sat back to watch the show.

;)

(And BTW, as odd as it might sound coming from me, there are some artists out there doing absolutely stunning work, using books as clay; ephemera as canvas.)
 
Back
Top