Obama's speech on race

That's been the downfall of nearly every evangelical preacher that squirms his way into a mega-church. They either get caught embezzling or sleeping with their secretary... or their secretary's son... or all of the above.

He's a showman and a con artist.
 
You really have no idea..

Do a little research on Jerry Falwell or hell, read the posts I made about him. He was a racist and bigot of the highest order and shook hands with many a Republican President and Presidential nominee.

Show me where he showed signs of white supremacy. He was against gays and women mostly. He was very much pro Bible. The Bible says nothing about blacks being the bad guy.
 
Reverend Rod Parsley believes America was founded to destroy Islam. Since this is such an outlandish claim, I have to add for the record, that he is not kidding. Reverend Parsley says Islam is an "anti-Christ religion" brought down from a "demon spirit." Of course, we are in a war against all Muslims, including presumably Muslim-Americans. Buts since Parsley believes this is a Christian nation and that it should be run as a theocracy, he is not very concerned what Muslim-Americans think.

John McCain says Reverend Rod Parsley is his "spiritual guide."

Parsley has called for Christians to wage war against the “false religion” of Islam, in order to destroy it. He does not distinguish between Islamic extremists and ordinary Muslims. “What some call ‘extremists’ are instead mainstream believers who are drawing from the well at the very heart of Islam,” he has written.

And it’s not just Muslims he’s got it in for. Last year, Parsley’s organization called for people who commit adultery to be prosecuted, and in January he compared Planned Parenthood to the Nazis.

.
I dont see ANYTHING wrong with this at all
 
when THE HERO says this

John McCain says Reverend Rod Parsley is his "spiritual guide."

Its clearly a politcal statement

(not that Parsley said anything I disagree with)

What THE COLORED LYING MUSLIM CANDIDATE did for TWENTY YEARS is quite another
 
you all better worry about THIS then anything else

so tell me again

how is BAM the NEW AGE POLITICIAN?


L.A. TIMES ON PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE PORK: Hillary Clinton's tops in pork spending, Barack Obama's 2nd, but John McCain had none!
 
Our politicians rape us and tell us it is for our own good. Our thieving elites are child molesters: they stick their cocks in us and then they lie to us and tell us that is how it is supposed to be. They make us guilty for even thinking about questioning the way that it is. They threaten us if we even think about telling on them.

"I stand for Hope. I stand for Change."

Barack Obama is a fucking tool, a useless clown spouting easy answers just like the other two media-anointed "candidates."

The US has the most corrupt, venal political system in the Western world. The two party dictatorship WILL NOT ALLOW candidates whose views diverge from the mainstream to stay in the race. Kucinich, Gravel, and Paul were marginalized, mocked, ignored, and destroyed.

The only ones allowed to stay in the race are Establishment mouthpieces, all of whom share the same basic agenda: war, hegemony, and ownership by corporations.

To sit there and actually vote for or support one of these Frankensteins is like wearing a giant "I am stupid gullible fool" button on your ass, inviting repeated and constant rape of your dignity, your savings, and your ideals.

Voting for them is vile and contemptible. They are killers. Bald-faced liars, hegemonists and imperialist murderers.

I wouldn't spit on one of these corporatist fascist puppets if they were on fire.
 
Read this again

Reverend Rod Parsley believes America was founded to destroy Islam. Since this is such an outlandish claim,Why is this outlandish? Clearly it wasnt founded on that, but why is it outlandish? And whats wrong with destroying Islam? THEY WANNA DESTRO US! I have to add for the record, that he is not kidding. Reverend Parsley says Islam is an "anti-Christ religion" brought down from a "demon spirit."This is true, isnt it? Of course, we are in a war against all Muslims, including presumably Muslim-Americans. They are at war with us, why shouldnt we be at war with themButs since Parsley believes this is a Christian nation and that it should be run as a theocracy, he is not very concerned what Muslim-Americans think.

John McCain says Reverend Rod Parsley is his "spiritual guide."

Parsley has called for Christians to wage war against the “false religion” of Islam, in order to destroy itGOOD!. He does not distinguish between Islamic extremists and ordinary Muslims. “What some call ‘extremists’ are instead mainstream believers who are drawing from the well at the very heart of Islam,” he has written.100% corret

And it’s not just Muslims he’s got it in for. Last year, Parsley’s organization called for people who commit adultery to be prosecuted, Good!and in January he compared Planned Parenthood to the Nazis. They advocate the mass murder of BABIES, so he is right!


What EXACTLY is wrong with it?

NOTHING!

It says OTHERS are America's enemy, and he identifies the enemy correctly

OTOH

Wright says America is the enemy!

Whites are the enemy

He, and Amerian, attacks America and curses America!
 
By the way Busbody, why is it that you and Ulaven_Demorte seemed to be working together to post the EXACT SAME POSTS AND REPLIES to each other? Scripted conversation perhaps by two hired trolls working together?

They posted the below replies on this thread to in reply to each other - IDENTICAL POSTS on two different threads in identical reply. Pre-scripted conversation, neh?

Has O'bama played his last race card??


It appears that Barack Obama, allegedly decent guy and agent of "change" in Washington, requested an earmark in 2006 for $1 million taxpayer dollars for the hospital where his wife works.

Said hospital, by the way, gave Michelle Obama a huge raise (nearly $200,000, more than doubling her salary) in 2005 after Barack got elected to the United States Senate. Now, I know that there are lots of ways to talk about transactions like this involving public officials - quid pro quo, etc., but I prefer to call a crook a crook and just say that we're dealing with good, old fashioned, public corruption here.

I am having an especially hard time distinguishing Obama's actions here from those of, say, Duke Cunningham, who is currently in prison. :D



I suppose you might say that Obama injected some more efficiency into the process by eliminating the middle man, but while I'm a big fan of efficient markets, generally speaking, I happen to think that there should not be any sort of market at all for the votes of public officials. Perhaps these silly notions of ethical propriety are what Obama intends to "change" if he is elected President. If that's the case, I'll take the status quo, thanks. Without the quid.





He's gonna have to come up with a new slogan.

Still flogging that non-story? You should learn not to believe everything Michelle Malkin dribbles into your ear.

That hospital serves a massive amount of non-compensated Medicare and Medicade patients, along the lines of $90 million the year that construction money went through. The construction (a 600,000 sq foot facility) increased the not for profit Hospital's capacity by 1/3.

She received that nice little raise after being promoted to Vice President and her salary is comparable to the other 16 VP's at the Hospital. She had been working for that facility long before Barak became a Senator. But I'm sure she couldn't possibly have moved up without her husband's help.

You're trying to link a bunch of non-related events and half-assed facts into a conspiracy of which Lovelynice would be proud.

Look through this thread, you'll find the EXACT SAME POSTS AND REPLIES TO EACH OTHER.

On this thread you and he posted the EXACT SAME THING
GOP Group: Ex-Treasurer Diverted Up To $1M

It appears that Barack Obama, allegedly decent guy and agent of "change" in Washington, requested an earmark in 2006 for $1 million taxpayer dollars for the hospital where his wife works.

Said hospital, by the way, gave Michelle Obama a huge raise (nearly $200,000, more than doubling her salary) in 2005 after Barack got elected to the United States Senate. Now, I know that there are lots of ways to talk about transactions like this involving public officials - quid pro quo, etc., but I prefer to call a crook a crook and just say that we're dealing with good, old fashioned, public corruption here.

I am having an especially hard time distinguishing Obama's actions here from those of, say, Duke Cunningham, who is currently in prison.


I suppose you might say that Obama injected some more efficiency into the process by eliminating the middle man, but while I'm a big fan of efficient markets, generally speaking, I happen to think that there should not be any sort of market at all for the votes of public officials. Perhaps these silly notions of ethical propriety are what Obama intends to "change" if he is elected President. If that's the case, I'll take the status quo, thanks. Without the quid.





He's gonna have to come up with a new slogan.


Still flogging that non-story? You should learn not to believe everything Michelle Malkin dribbles into your ear.

That hospital serves a massive amount of non-compensated Medicare and Medicade patients, along the lines of $90 million the year that construction money went through. The construction (a 600,000 sq foot facility) increased the not for profit Hospital's capacity by 1/3.

She received that nice little raise after being promoted to Vice President and her salary is comparable to the other 16 VP's at the Hospital. She had been working for that facility long before Barak became a Senator. But I'm sure she couldn't possibly have moved up without her husband's help. :rolleyes:

You're trying to link a bunch of non-related events and half-assed facts into a conspiracy of which Lovelynice would be proud. :rolleyes:

Could you explain why you and Ulaven_Demorte are obviously posting pre-scripted stuff like this? Trying to fake a debate perhaps?


.
 
From a LEFT WING Radio talk show host

(Of ourse, if the DUMZ take it away from BAM, the BLOWZ NOZE* will riot)

ma is Weaker General Election Candidate


* Florida: Clinton 44 percent - McCain 42 percent; McCain beats Obama 46 - 37 percent;

* Ohio: Clinton beats McCain 48 - 39 percent; Obama gets 43 percent to McCain's 42 percent;

* Pennsylvania: Clinton tops McCain 48 - 40 percent; Obama leads McCain 43 - 39 percent.



Hel-loooo surperdelegates. Wake up and take a look at reality if Obama is our nominee.

Quinnipiac has a new poll out that is bad news for Obama and Democrats if he's at the top of the ticket. Add to this Obama's unwillingness to allow Florida and Michigan to have re-votes, and you have a general election candidate with more than a few flaws.


"The difference between Clinton and Obama in Florida is the white vote," said Brown. "She gets 38 percent to 50 percent for McCain, but Obama loses to the Arizona senator 54 - 27 among white voters. If Obama does get the nomination, how he fares with whites will be crucial to his chances."

This is what I've been writing about for weeks:

"The economic concerns of voters make Ohio a tougher challenge for McCain than has traditionally been the case for Republicans, who have never won the White House without carrying Ohio," Brown said. "But Obama's weakness among white men is an indication that he has not yet closed the sale among the lunch bucket brigade."


It's stunning that people are not thinking forward to the general election and who has a better chance to win. That's the biggest reason Clinton is working so hard to shut everyone up so she can finish the race. The long march to April 22nd is causing the nervous elite nellies to hyperventilate on Democratic disaster. However, the real nightmare would be if we nominated the wrong candidate.


"At least for now, Sen. Clinton's argument that she is the better general election candidate in these key battleground states appears to have some validity," said Brown. "In this survey, her strength among white voters is why she runs better against Sen. McCain than does Sen. Obama.


Reagan Democrats aren't buying Obama now. After the Republicans 527s get finished running Rev. Wright day and night, the "white flight" will only get worse.

Clinton's strength on the economy is also a huge advantage. Her experience watching Washington work is also an asset, as is her proven ability to walk across the aisle and work with people, even those who used to be adversaries going back to her husband's impeachment.

That said, the Bosnia flap has made it into the late night comic bloodstream and needs to play itself out. It wouldn't be a problem if Obama wasn't out spending her.

In the end, let's remember that Clinton is the stronger closer. Murtha set the bar yesterday: Clinton by double digits. That prediction needs to hold. She's got a lot of support in Pennsylvania. Obama's in for the fight of his life in Pennsylvania. Because if he loses lunch bucket Democrats by big margins it will also further prove his inability to close the deal, which continues to dog him.


* I say BLOWZ Noze beause some of you freakazoids are all uptight with Knee Growz:eek:
 
Our politicians rape us and tell us it is for our own good. Our thieving elites are child molesters: they stick their cocks in us and then they lie to us and tell us that is how it is supposed to be. They make us guilty for even thinking about questioning the way that it is. They threaten us if we even think about telling on them.

"I stand for Hope. I stand for Change."

Barack Obama is a fucking tool, a useless clown spouting easy answers just like the other two media-anointed "candidates."

The US has the most corrupt, venal political system in the Western world. The two party dictatorship WILL NOT ALLOW candidates whose views diverge from the mainstream to stay in the race. Kucinich, Gravel, and Paul were marginalized, mocked, ignored, and destroyed.

The only ones allowed to stay in the race are Establishment mouthpieces, all of whom share the same basic agenda: war, hegemony, and ownership by corporations.

To sit there and actually vote for or support one of these Frankensteins is like wearing a giant "I am stupid gullible fool" button on your ass, inviting repeated and constant rape of your dignity, your savings, and your ideals.

Voting for them is vile and contemptible. They are killers. Bald-faced liars, hegemonists and imperialist murderers.

I wouldn't spit on one of these corporatist fascist puppets if they were on fire.

You had a great post until the fourth paragraph.

So the US is more corrupt than Mexico or Cuba? Please.

Kucinich, Gravel, and Paul were "mocked and ignored" because people thought they deserved to be mocked and ignored. Gravel and Paul are whackjob isolationists. Kucinich is spineless appeaser who thinks we should try and understand why our enemy wants to kill us.

A corporatist fascist? Please explain.
 
You can start with Jerry Falwell. That'll be fun.

Falwell launched on the warpath against civil rights four years after the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision to desegregate public schools with a sermon titled "Segregation or Integration: Which?"

"If Chief Justice Warren and his associates had known God's word and had desired to do the Lord's will, I am quite confident that the 1954 decision would never have been made," Falwell boomed from above his congregation in Lynchburg. "The facilities should be separate. When God has drawn a line of distinction, we should not attempt to cross that line."

Falwell's jeremiad continued: "The true Negro does not want integration.... He realizes his potential is far better among his own race." Falwell went on to announce that integration "will destroy our race eventually. In one northern city," he warned, "a pastor friend of mine tells me that a couple of opposite race live next door to his church as man and wife."

As pressure from the civil rights movement built during the early 1960s, and President Lyndon Johnson introduced sweeping civil rights legislation, Falwell grew increasingly conspiratorial. He enlisted with J. Edgar Hoover to distribute FBI manufactured propaganda against the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and publicly denounced the 1964 Civil Rights Act as "civil wrongs."

Show me where he showed signs of white supremacy. He was against gays and women mostly. He was very much pro Bible. The Bible says nothing about blacks being the bad guy.

You have to actually READ.. or get someone to sound out the bigger words for you.
 
Last edited:
By the way Busbody, why is it that you and Ulaven_Demorte seemed to be working together to post the EXACT SAME POSTS AND REPLIES to each other? Scripted conversation perhaps by two hired trolls working together?

They posted the below replies on this thread to in reply to each other - IDENTICAL POSTS on two different threads in identical reply. Pre-scripted conversation, neh?

Has O'bama played his last race card??






Look through this thread, you'll find the EXACT SAME POSTS AND REPLIES TO EACH OTHER.

On this thread you and he posted the EXACT SAME THING
GOP Group: Ex-Treasurer Diverted Up To $1M






Could you explain why you and Ulaven_Demorte are obviously posting pre-scripted stuff like this? Trying to fake a debate perhaps?


.

He does just like you're doing here, spreading the exact same post across multiple threads Crazynice. Now think for a moment, and after you can see through the cloud of smoke maybe you will see why he gets the same answer to the same question across multiple threads.

Then again...
 
You didn't finish UD....you should have wrote: You have to READ for a very long time with my extreme prejudice and all will become clear.

*yawn*

Care to defend the Rev. Falwell's racist, segregationist views or dispute the quotes or are you just here to spout nonsense as usual?
 
So what is the source UD?

As was shown in the original post...

From a sermon, "Segregation or Integration, Which?" published by Thomas Road Baptist Church in "The Word of Life" by the Rev. Jerry Falwell.

A simple search will turn up references to this sermon too many to list. It's common knowledge that Falwell was a segregationist bigot and a known hate-mongering racist homophobe.

Edit: For the record, the Thomas Road baptist Church was a segregated church at the time of that sermon, serving only white followers of God.
 
Last edited:
As was shown in the original post...

From a sermon, "Segregation or Integration, Which?" published by Thomas Road Baptist Church in "The Word of Life" by the Rev. Jerry Falwell.

A simple search will turn up references to this sermon too many to list. It's common knowledge that Falwell was a segregationist bigot and a known hate-mongering racist homophobe.

Edit: For the record, the Thomas Road baptist Church was a segregated church at the time of that sermon, serving only white followers of God.
as usual

you MISS the point

its NOT wh Fallwell et al said years ago

because McCain hasnt been a disciple of his or anyone else for TWENTY YEARS

and hasnt DEFENDED him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But I do hope you all keep this in the news:D
 
As was shown in the original post...

From a sermon, "Segregation or Integration, Which?" published by Thomas Road Baptist Church in "The Word of Life" by the Rev. Jerry Falwell.

A simple search will turn up references to this sermon too many to list. It's common knowledge that Falwell was a segregationist bigot and a known hate-mongering racist homophobe.

Edit: For the record, the Thomas Road baptist Church was a segregated church at the time of that sermon, serving only white followers of God.
so what he said DECADES ago

has to do with us today

WHAT?


????????????????????????

jack ass!
 
Back
Top