Obama's speech on race

No

I am saying

watch the video

when Americans see that

it should be hard to vote for someone who has done NOTHING and who HATES America

BUT

I believe that the "person" who has done nothing and HATES America will start with 46% of the vote

as almost HALF of America hates America

KNEE GROWS

FEMINAZIS

DISEASED DICK DANGLERS

RETARDS

and

THE DEAD:mad:
 
Y'all still whining about This. All this shows me is you don't have anything else in your bag. Good thing he's black or you all would be fucked... you are anyway and you know it. I'm just loving watching you right wingers finish destroying the RepubliKKKlan Party. Rock on losers.
 
Y'all still whining about This. All this shows me is you don't have anything else in your bag. Good thing he's black or you all would be fucked... you are anyway and you know it. I'm just loving watching you right wingers finish destroying the RepubliKKKlan Party. Rock on losers.
Actually, some would say the KKK part belongs to Rev Wright, just without the white hoods and the burning crosses.
 
Y'all still whining about This. All this shows me is you don't have anything else in your bag. Good thing he's black or you all would be fucked... you are anyway and you know it. I'm just loving watching you right wingers finish destroying the RepubliKKKlan Party. Rock on losers.
werent the real losers the DUMZ in 00 and 04

or were the votes not counted:confused:
 
Wright=Lunatic

Epistle to the Timesians

Jodi Kantor is a New York Times reporter who has covered Barack Obama's relationship with Jeremiah Wright. Kantor interviewed Wright in early 2007 for a profile of Obama's religious views, but used first used a snippet of the interview in her March 2007 story covering Obama's disinvitation of Wright from giving the invocation at Obama's announcement of his presidential candidacy. Kantor quoted Wright:

“Fifteen minutes before Shabbos I get a call from Barack,” Mr. Wright said in an interview on Monday, recalling that he was at an interfaith conference at the time. “One of his members had talked him into uninviting me,” Mr. Wright said, referring to Mr. Obama’s campaign advisers.


In April 2007, the Kantor returned to the subject of Obama and Wright for the article that had occasioned the interview with Wright. Kantor observed:
Mr. Wright’s assertions of widespread white racism and his scorching remarks about American government have drawn criticism, and prompted the senator to cancel his delivery of the invocation when he formally announced his candidacy in February.

Mr. Obama, a Democratic presidential candidate who says he was only shielding his pastor from the spotlight, said he respected Mr. Wright’s work for the poor and his fight against injustice. But “we don’t agree on everything,” Mr. Obama said. “I’ve never had a thorough conversation with him about all aspects of politics.”

Reverend Wright was disappointed by Kantor's treatment of him in the first of these articles. He unloaded in a long letter to Kantor that has now been posted on Mark Halperin's Time site The Page. In the letter Wright castigates the Times as a right-wing organ that has somehow treated him unfairly. He expresses outrage over Kantor's use of his interview in the first of the two articles, implying that Obama had expressed regret to Wright over the disinvitation:


I do not remember reading in your article that Barack had apologized for listening to that bad information and bad advice. Did I miss it? Or did your editor cut it out? Either way, you do not have to worry about hearing anything else from me for you to edit or “spin” because you are more interested in journalism than in truth.


Speaking of Kantor's editor, Wright implies that Kantor confided to Wright that her editor is not a staightforward newsman:


Your editor is a sensationalist. For you to even mention that makes me doubt your credibility, and I am looking forward to see how you are going to butcher what else I had to say concerning Senator Obama’s “Spiritual Biography.”
Kantor, however, should not feel too bad. Wright's contempt for the Times predates Kantor's interview of him for the 2007 articles. Here Wright rambles:
Forgive me for having a momentary lapse. I forgot that The New York Times was leading the bandwagon in trumpeting why it is we should have gone into an illegal war. The New York Times became George Bush and the Republican Party’s national “blog.” The New York Times played a role in the outing of Valerie Plame. I do not know why I thought The New York Times had actually repented and was going to exhibit a different kind of behavior.


What led him into this delusion? Wright seems to recall that Kantor is, ah, you know, Jewish:


Maybe it was my faith in the Jewish Holy Day of Roshashana. Maybe it was my being caught up in the euphoria of the Season of Lent; but whatever it is or was, I was sadly mistaken. There is no repentance on the part of The New York Times. There is no integrity when it comes to The Times. You should do well with that paper, Jodi. You looked me straight in my face and told me a lie!
All in all, a remarkable document.
 
Rip Van Obama

http://www.powerlineblog.com/20080331RZ1AP-Obama.jpg


Even the Associated Press Is On To Obama

Earlier today, I noted the hollowness of Barack Obama's defense of his failure to do anything--for twenty years!--to distance himself from Jeremiah Wright's hate speech:

Had the reverend not retired, and had he not acknowledged that what he had said had deeply offended people and were inappropriate and mischaracterized what I believe is the greatness of this country, for all its flaws, then I wouldn't have felt comfortable staying at the church.


The additional point that should be made is that Obama's claim that Wright has "acknowledged that what he had said...were inappropriate" is simply false. Wright has done no such thing. It's too early to say that the bloom is off the Obama rose, but even the Associated Press felt constrained to point out his misrepresentation in an article titled "Obama Suggests Ex-pastor Is Contrite":

Democrat Barack Obama seemed to suggest in an interview aired Friday that his former pastor has acknowledged that his controversial remarks were inappropriate and hurtful, although there are no public accounts of the minister having done so.


Obama's campaign responded by denying that Obama said what he said:

They lie as much as THE PUSSY does:D

Obama spokesman Bill Burton said the senator's remarks did not imply that Wright has expressed misgivings about his statements.
"Sen. Obama was clearly saying that were Rev. Wright not retiring, he would need to be assured that the reverend understood why what he had said had deeply offended people and mischaracterized the greatness of this country," Burton said.


This kind of bald-faced prevarication works as long as pretty much all reporters are willing to cover for a candidate. So far, that's been the case with Obama; perhaps no longer.

PAUL adds: I should say that I understood Obama's statement
 
Do you mean that Rev. Wright granted an interview and had subsequent correspondence with a Jewess? That puts the lie to your allegations of anti-semitism, doesn't it?
 
Rip Van Obama

http://www.powerlineblog.com/20080331RZ1AP-Obama.jpg


Even the Associated Press Is On To Obama

Earlier today, I noted the hollowness of Barack Obama's defense of his failure to do anything--for twenty years!--to distance himself from Jeremiah Wright's hate speech:

Had the reverend not retired, and had he not acknowledged that what he had said had deeply offended people and were inappropriate and mischaracterized what I believe is the greatness of this country, for all its flaws, then I wouldn't have felt comfortable staying at the church.


The additional point that should be made is that Obama's claim that Wright has "acknowledged that what he had said...were inappropriate" is simply false. Wright has done no such thing. It's too early to say that the bloom is off the Obama rose, but even the Associated Press felt constrained to point out his misrepresentation in an article titled "Obama Suggests Ex-pastor Is Contrite":

Democrat Barack Obama seemed to suggest in an interview aired Friday that his former pastor has acknowledged that his controversial remarks were inappropriate and hurtful, although there are no public accounts of the minister having done so.


Obama's campaign responded by denying that Obama said what he said:

They lie as much as THE PUSSY does:D

Obama spokesman Bill Burton said the senator's remarks did not imply that Wright has expressed misgivings about his statements.
"Sen. Obama was clearly saying that were Rev. Wright not retiring, he would need to be assured that the reverend understood why what he had said had deeply offended people and mischaracterized the greatness of this country," Burton said.


This kind of bald-faced prevarication works as long as pretty much all reporters are willing to cover for a candidate. So far, that's been the case with Obama; perhaps no longer.

PAUL adds: I should say that I understood Obama's statement
WTF?

You don't think for yourself whatsoever, do you?
 
Y'all still whining about This. All this shows me is you don't have anything else in your bag. Good thing he's black or you all would be fucked... you are anyway and you know it. I'm just loving watching you right wingers finish destroying the RepubliKKKlan Party. Rock on losers.

RebubliKKKlan?

Google Robert Byrd. He's a DemoKKKrat.

Bozo.
 
Y'all still whining about This. All this shows me is you don't have anything else in your bag. Good thing he's black or you all would be fucked... you are anyway and you know it. I'm just loving watching you right wingers finish destroying the RepubliKKKlan Party. Rock on losers.

Interesting Facts about Democrats and Republicans:

After The Civil Rights Act was passed Democrat President Lyndon Johnson praised Republicans for their overwhelming support.

The Republican Party was formed by anti-slavery activists to combat the pro-slavery Democrats

The Ku Klux Klan was formed by radical Democrats who opposed equality for blacks.

In 1935 Democrats defeated an Anti-Lynching Bill supported and put forward by Republicans.

The 1924 Democrat National Convention in New York was host to one of the largest Klan gatherings in American history. Dubbed the “Klanbake convention”, a minority of delegates attempted to condemn the presence of the Klan but was rebuked by the Klan supporting Democrat Majority.

On April 20, 1871 the Republican Congress enacted the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-Affiliated terrorist groups.

Ronald Reagan, a Republican, made history on November 2, 1983 by signing into law Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday as a National Holiday. This is the first and only Federal Holiday that recognizes a Black American.


Do some research before you post, mo'ron--Rock on loser!
 
Explain

if you can:rolleyes:
Some braindead blogger posts what he thinks Obama seemed to say, and when the matter is clarified, thinks Obama is prevaricating.

Then you copy & paste this worthless tripe like a poorly trained parrot.
 
Interesting Facts about Democrats and Republicans:

After The Civil Rights Act was passed Democrat President Lyndon Johnson praised Republicans for their overwhelming support.

The Republican Party was formed by anti-slavery activists to combat the pro-slavery Democrats

The Ku Klux Klan was formed by radical Democrats who opposed equality for blacks.

In 1935 Democrats defeated an Anti-Lynching Bill supported and put forward by Republicans.

The 1924 Democrat National Convention in New York was host to one of the largest Klan gatherings in American history. Dubbed the “Klanbake convention”, a minority of delegates attempted to condemn the presence of the Klan but was rebuked by the Klan supporting Democrat Majority.

On April 20, 1871 the Republican Congress enacted the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-Affiliated terrorist groups.

Ronald Reagan, a Republican, made history on November 2, 1983 by signing into law Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday as a National Holiday. This is the first and only Federal Holiday that recognizes a Black American.


Do some research before you post, mo'ron--Rock on loser!

Neglecting to mention, as is the norm for those trying to paint the Democratic party as the party of slavery (which they were) and the Republicans as the Party of Lincoln, that the Democrats were the conservative party at the time and the Republicans the liberal party. Those conservatives jumped ship to the Republican party a long, long time ago. That sort of shifts the blame on every single one of your "interesting facts" but the last doesn't it?

If Lincoln were alive today he would be a Democrat and you would still be an idiot. :D

The only thing on your list that can be attributed to a conservative is Reagan making MLK Jr.'s Birthday a national holiday, Which conservatives STILL complain about by the way. Talk about needing to do some research! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Some braindead blogger posts what he thinks Obama seemed to say, and when the matter is clarified, thinks Obama is prevaricating.

Then you copy & paste this worthless tripe like a poorly trained parrot.

FACT: BAM said Wright apoligized

When asked to show where and how

BAM's peole said well, not really

So BAM LIED
 
RebubliKKKlan?

Google Robert Byrd. He's a DemoKKKrat.

Bozo.

Typical AM talk radio/Fox News talking point for morons. Everybody knows the KKK is conservative and votes Republican exclusiveley. Byrd is a liberal Democrat, and is not championed, endorsed, or promoted by the KKK. That would be conservative Republicans (i.e.. Trett Lott, Strom Thurman, Jesse Helms, etc.)
 
Neglecting to mention, as is the norm for those trying to paint the Democratic party as the party of slavery (which they were) and the Republicans as the Party of Lincoln, that the Democrats were the conservative party at the time and the Republicans the liberal party. Those conservatives jumped ship to the Republican party a long, long time ago. That sort of shifts the blame on every single one of your "interesting facts" but the last doesn't it?

If Lincoln were alive today he would be a Democrat and you would still be an idiot. :D

The only thing on your list that can be attributed to a conservative is Reagan making MLK Jr.'s Birthday a national holiday, Which conservatives STILL complain about by the way. Talk about needing to do some research! :rolleyes:
I was simply debating the fact that he called the Republican party part of the KKK. Also, I doubt your information is correct.
 
I was simply debating the fact that he called the Republican party part of the KKK. Also, I doubt your information is correct.

You can doubt my information all you want, but disputing it is another matter entirely. The argument could be made that the Republican party, as it stands now, is the party of the KKK. The KKK is backed by ultra-conservative whack jobs.

One doesn't find that sort in the Democratic party anymore. They've been firmly entrenched in the Republican party for decades now.
 
You can doubt my information all you want, but disputing it is another matter entirely. The argument could be made that the Republican party, as it stands now, is the party of the KKK. The KKK is backed by ultra-conservative whack jobs.

One doesn't find that sort in the Democratic party anymore. They've been firmly entrenched in the Republican party for decades now.

show me your work....please provide links to support this.
 
Typical AM talk radio/Fox News talking point for morons. Everybody knows the KKK is conservative and votes Republican exclusiveley. Byrd is a liberal Democrat, and is not championed, endorsed, or promoted by the KKK. That would be conservative Republicans (i.e.. Trett Lott, Strom Thurman, Jesse Helms, etc.)

everyone knows the NEW BLACK PANTHER Party is a terrorist group

THEY HAVE ENDORSED BAM AND ITS ON BAM's WEBSITE!
 
show me your work....please provide links to support this.

Don't be lazy now. You were the one hyping all of those "interesting facts" about the Republican and Democratic parties. If you're going to dispute my claim that the Democratic party was the conservative party at the time then do so.

The "Dixiecrats" (those southern conservatives within the Democratic party at the time when civil rights legislation began to take hold) started defecting to the Republican party after 1948 when the Democratic National Convention adopted a strong civil rights plank. By the mid 1960's both the Democratic and Republican parties realigned into close to what they are today.

This is common knowledge, you should spend a bit more time reading history rather than advising others to do so.
 
Don't be lazy now. You were the one hyping all of those "interesting facts" about the Republican and Democratic parties. If you're going to dispute my claim that the Democratic party was the conservative party at the time then do so.

The "Dixiecrats" (those southern conservatives within the Democratic party at the time when civil rights legislation began to take hold) started defecting to the Republican party after 1948 when the Democratic National Convention adopted a strong civil rights plank. By the mid 1960's both the Democratic and Republican parties realigned into close to what they are today.

This is common knowledge, you should spend a bit more time reading history rather than advising others to do so.
Thanks for living up to my expectations....:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top