busybody..
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2002
- Posts
- 149,503
Obama's speech
There were parts of his speech that I really liked as he spoke of recognizing the anger that blacks and whites feel, but trying to rise above that. That is the promise of his campaign. One thing I'd been waiting to hear from him is, if he says he rejects Reverend Wrights diatribes against America, why does he? When he attends a church where the country that Obama wants to lead is regularly portrayed as a place of evils and a guilty history, it wasn't enough to say that the Senator disagreed, but he needed to say why he disagreed and what he found to admire and be proud of in our country.
Ironically, this quintessentially American – and yes, conservative – notion ofself-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright’s sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.
However, I found it disturbing that he threw his grandmother under the bus by making her privately stated qualms about race equivalent to what Reverend Wright has been saying about white America. She is still alive. Did he call her up and let her know that he was going to tell the whole world that she had said things that had made him cringe?
And I keep on thinking about how he chooses to bring his children to hear these sermons that he says now he says presented "a profoundly distorted view of this country." Of course, just a few days ago he was saying that he hadn't heard anything like those clips that were being played on TV. I guess that denial is no longer operative.
And of course Obama was a lot more assertive in his condemnation of Don Imus's "nappy-headed ho's" comment and the effect that such words have on his daughters. As Ace points out, how does he explain to his daughters that the minister he takes him to hear says that the government created the AIDS virus to kill black people?
He implied in his speech that people found the sight of his reverend's sermons and the response among the congregation shocking because they don't know what the atmosphere is like in a black church. I find that insulting.
People weren't finding that laughter and humor what was jarring. It was hearing someone assert, five days after 9/11, that the "chickens were coming home to roost" or blaming white America for the AIDS virus.
So while his speech made have helped Obama burnish his credentials as the son of a white woman and an African man who can help our country bridge the wounds created by slavery and racism, he still hasn't fully answered doubts raised in many people's minds about bringing his family to attend a church where his country is regularly portrayed as a place deserving of attacks and terrorism.
There were parts of his speech that I really liked as he spoke of recognizing the anger that blacks and whites feel, but trying to rise above that. That is the promise of his campaign. One thing I'd been waiting to hear from him is, if he says he rejects Reverend Wrights diatribes against America, why does he? When he attends a church where the country that Obama wants to lead is regularly portrayed as a place of evils and a guilty history, it wasn't enough to say that the Senator disagreed, but he needed to say why he disagreed and what he found to admire and be proud of in our country.
Ironically, this quintessentially American – and yes, conservative – notion ofself-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright’s sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.
However, I found it disturbing that he threw his grandmother under the bus by making her privately stated qualms about race equivalent to what Reverend Wright has been saying about white America. She is still alive. Did he call her up and let her know that he was going to tell the whole world that she had said things that had made him cringe?
And I keep on thinking about how he chooses to bring his children to hear these sermons that he says now he says presented "a profoundly distorted view of this country." Of course, just a few days ago he was saying that he hadn't heard anything like those clips that were being played on TV. I guess that denial is no longer operative.
And of course Obama was a lot more assertive in his condemnation of Don Imus's "nappy-headed ho's" comment and the effect that such words have on his daughters. As Ace points out, how does he explain to his daughters that the minister he takes him to hear says that the government created the AIDS virus to kill black people?
He implied in his speech that people found the sight of his reverend's sermons and the response among the congregation shocking because they don't know what the atmosphere is like in a black church. I find that insulting.
People weren't finding that laughter and humor what was jarring. It was hearing someone assert, five days after 9/11, that the "chickens were coming home to roost" or blaming white America for the AIDS virus.
So while his speech made have helped Obama burnish his credentials as the son of a white woman and an African man who can help our country bridge the wounds created by slavery and racism, he still hasn't fully answered doubts raised in many people's minds about bringing his family to attend a church where his country is regularly portrayed as a place deserving of attacks and terrorism.
